Nasdaq: Why Does the US Import Oil?

This article is from March, but the explanation is simple to understand and the article is trending:

Nasdaq headline: America Produces Enough Oil to Meet Its Needs, So Why Do We Import Crude?
CONTRIBUTOR
Martin Tillier
PUBLISHED
MAR 8, 2022 10:18AM EST

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/america-produces-enough-oil-…

The U.S does indeed produce enough oil to meet its own needs. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), in 2020 America produced 18.4 million barrels of oil per day and consumed 18.12 million. And yet that same report reveals that the U.S. imported 7.86 million barrels of oil per day last year.

That happens because of a combination of economics and chemistry. The economics are simple: overseas oil, even after shipping costs, is often cheaper than domestically-produced crude. That is because what oil people call “lifting costs,” the cost of actually getting the oil out of the ground, are so much lower in some other countries. That, in turn, is down to a number of factors. Environmental and other regulations here play a part in that cost differential of course, but, contrary to what some would have you believe, they are far from the be-all and end-all in affecting prices.

Land and lease prices are a big factor, as are labor and other costs. Then there is the fact that so many countries, and Russia is definitely one of them, that see oil exports as an important strategic and geopolitical tool. In those cases, these nations give concessions to ensure that their oil is sold at an advantageous price. Right now, Vladimir Putin is being accused of weaponizing energy supply, but it is something that he and other dictators and human rights abusers have been doing for years to make client nations, including the U.S., ignore who they are and what they do.

Give this writer a Joe Biden-MBS fist bump, will ya?

You see, the U.S. does produce enough oil to meet its own needs, but it is the wrong type of oil.

Crude is graded according to two main metrics, weight and sweetness. The weight of oil defines how easy it is to refine, or break down into its usable component parts, such as gasoline, jet fuel and diesel. Light crude is the easiest to handle, heavy is the most difficult, with intermediate obviously somewhere in between. The sweetness refers to the sulfur content of unrefined oil. The sweeter it is, the less sulfur it contains.

Most of the oil produced in the U.S. fields in Texas, Oklahoma, and elsewhere is light and sweet, compared to what comes from the Middle East and Russia. The problem is that for many years, imported oil met most of the U.S.’s energy needs, so a large percentage of the refining capacity here is geared towards dealing with oil that is heavier and less sweet than the kind produced here.

What I don’t understand is how the US Government hasn’t subsidized new light crude refineries - or retrofitted refineries - as National Security insurance. Of course nobody wants a new refinery near their homes - unless they are already built and in use and the populace is used to the supply of jobs over pollution. So retrofitting would probably be easier.

11 Likes

So retrofitting would probably be easier.

One concern is that a refinery is to a large extent built specifically for a given crude type,
from crackers right down to the types of pipeline and shipping routes entering and leaving it.

“Retrofit” sounds good, in that (as you note) at least the land is permitted for having a refinery on it.
But to an inconveniently large extent it might mean tearing it down and rebuilding a different one.
Doable, but expensive and time consuming.
Motivations aren’t great:
Instead of the usual mere delay before products and profits from a new one, profits would drop as the existing one went off line.
So would aggregate supply of refined products.

An extreme case of the input/output issue would be the Schwedt refinery in Germany, which sits on the Druzhba [“friendship!”] pipeline coming in from Russia.
There is no obvious way to get oil from anywhere else to that location.
Some US refineries have the same problem to a lesser extent. To change the oil it refines means not
only changing the refinery’s capabilities to some extent, but also finding a way to receive the oil you want refined.

Jim

19 Likes

An extreme case of the input/output issue would be the Schwedt refinery in Germany, which sits on the Druzhba [“friendship!”] pipeline coming in from Russia.
There is no obvious way to get oil from anywhere else to that location.
Some US refineries have the same problem to a lesser extent. To change the oil it refines means not
only changing the refinery’s capabilities to some extent, but also finding a way to receive the oil you want refined.

- Jim

Thank-you, Jim. Your explanation clears up my assumptions and mis-perceptions. And that’s a great piece of knowledge to learn about teh Schwedt refinery in Germany. Keep this type of analysis forthcoming for those of us who don’t know much about oil refining.

I still think this is a National Security issue, but I don’t see any politician on either side of the aisle floating an idea to build a new or retrofitted refinery to crack Light Crude which we have plenty of in the USA as the article contends. A new refinery in the red state of Florida would never fly. You won’t see oil rigs offshore here either.

  • Rock in the Keys

Thank-you, Jim. Your explanation clears up my assumptions and mis-perceptions.

I don’t know much about the subject.
Just think of my comments as places to look for more information.
Mainly I’ve just read a lot of newspaper articles over the years mentioning the close matching of oil to refinery, and the consequences of that which keep surprising people.

e.g., complex US refineries that were tuned for processing heavy sour (but cheap) Venezuelan crude.
With that source in effect banned, you’d want a replacement of a similar type that’s reasonably close.
Which leads to a discussion of the Keystone XL pipeline…

Jim

3 Likes

This page has more details about US import and export of crude oil and petroleum products. It seems most petroleum products consumed domestically and exported are refined from US produced crude oil.

https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-produc….

2 Likes

I still think this is a National Security issue, but I don’t see any politician on either side of the aisle floating an idea to build a new or retrofitted refinery to crack Light Crude which we have plenty of in the USA as the article contends.

I understand that Exxon Mobil has gone forward with a 250,000 B/D expansion at the Beaumont Tx refinery to process Permian crude. The primary installation is a new distillation unit. Downstream processes will be performed by existing units at the Beaumont, Baton Rouge, and Baytown refineries. Some modifications/expansions will be needed, but the combination is far cheaper than a new refinery. This is being driven by economics. The project was initially approved in 2019, well ahead of the current supply/demand crunch.

Originally scheduled to be completed in 2022, this has been pushed to a 2023 startup - part of the capital delays triggered by the pandemic driven drop in demand.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-refinery-expansion-exxon-…

3 Likes

One concern is that a refinery is to a large extent built specifically for a given crude type,
from crackers right down to the types of pipeline and shipping routes entering and leaving it.

… and …

An extreme case of the input/output issue would be the Schwedt refinery in Germany, …

To change the oil it refines means not only changing the refinery’s capabilities,

Huh. There’s a guy who posts articles on The Saker (note: a very pro-Russia site, so you have to factor that in) that has expounded about the issues of German refineries that basically can’t work on anything other that Russian crude. He has beaten the drums on this — on and on and on and on – in article after article. So I have figured that he is overstating the issue by 1000 percent. Although maybe he is just fervent and warning against disaster.

But from Jim’s comment, perhaps he is not overstating by much.

A sample article: “Europe fails with German help” http://thesaker.is/europe-fails-with-german-help/

"refineries-are-pretty-much-built-and-later-matched-and-finely-tuned-for-the-feedstock-they-will-use-for-the-rest-of-their-useful-service-lives… and can only be tweaked so far to be able to use even a slightly different feedstock, let alone completely different crudes such as traditional Venezuelan or Iranian oils. "

" European refineries were built, matched, and mated to the Russian Urals blend ... mostly un-replaceable Russian Urals crude oil blend and the most convenient Russian Druzbha door-to-door pipeline "

3 Likes

about the issues of German refineries that basically can’t work on anything other that Russian crude.

I think in the German case, it’s not just matching the equipment to the crude, but in some cases the geography.
If you have a landlocked refinery sitting on a pipeline, what else are you going to refine? Stuff that you truck in?
Less of a problem for (say) US gulf refineries that could probably take anything seaborne with the right properties.
Except for that minor issue that the otherwise most convenient Canadian stuff isn’t seaborne.

Jim

1 Like

Most of the imported oil probably comes from Canada.

What’s the issue. Canadian oil has to go somewhere. Why not to the US?

If the numbers work and everybody makes a buck, why not?

1 Like

Top 10 Countries from Which the U.S. Imports Oil (in barrels per day Dec. 2021):

Canada — 4,783,000
Mexico — 645,000
Saudi Arabia — 550,000
Russia — 405,000
Colombia — 228,000
Iraq — 223,000
Ecuador — 219,000
United Kingdom — 126,000
Nigeria — 110,000
South Korea — 102,000

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/us-oil-im…

Mike

2 Likes