FCorelli writes,
<<I like being a homeowner because I like my home and yard (though not right now after the recent ice storm and a million downed limbs
), but I really don’t consider it an investment. It’s where I live.>>>
And this is the whole point. It’s hard to make sense when half the people in the room are talking about investments and the other half are talking about what to buy with their investments. You gotta live somewhere. What floats your boat? It has a price.
Exactly! Real estate is an emotional business for many people – just look at how much I’ve got inparadise wound up.
Again, I’m not saying that anyone should live in a less luxurious property than they’d like. Just that it makes sense to investigate whether the real estate amenities you desire are cheaper to acquire by purchase or rent. Identifying this wide gap in asset pricing that defies explanation with arithmetic and a rational investment return is what earned Robert Shiller a Nobel Prize.
Why buy the cow if in many instances the milk is close to free? Let someone else pay for the care and feeding of the cow (i.e, the landlord) if he or she finds that to be a fashionable, status enhancing activity.
For example, in the 80’s and 90’s many homeowners got the idea that living on a golf course enhanced the value of their property and paid premium prices to do so. Most of these folks didn’t even play golf. They just thought it was status enhancing to live on a golf course.
After a year or two they start to realize that it’s very expensive to keep an 18-hole golf course in the kind of luxury condition that enhances property values. And every once and a while a golf ball comes through the picture window in the living room and the culprit is long gone. Then they look at the $500 or $600/month homeowners’ association fee and ask “Why are we paying for this, we don’t even play golf?”
Then the HOA decides to open up play to the public in an attempt to capture additional revenue to reduce the homeowners association fees. And that’s when you see intercst and his retired friends playing on your luxury, status enhancing golf course for $20 mid-week, cart and box lunch included. It was amazing.
Similarly, IP made the point that intercst doesn’t need to think about the quality of local schools since he doesn’t have kids. That’s very true. However, I pointed out that there are 2 and 3 bedroom apartments in the highly-rated Memorial School District just North of where I lived in Houston that rented for similar prices. You didn’t need to buy a $1 million home to send your kid to a good school. Actually, the funniest thing about Memorial was that it wasn’t uncommon for parents to pay up for a home in the Memorial School District and then decide it was even more status enhancing to send their kids to one of the expensive private schools in the area that cost as much as college. They were paying for the kid’s education twice – in both increased property taxes and private school tuition. Real estate is an emotional business.
But by far my favorite real estate pricing disparity is in Beverly Hills CA. There are apparently a few apartment complexes just inside the border of the Beverly Hills School District. I’m sure they cost thousands of dollars a month to rent, but it’s still a lot cheaper than buying a $5 or $10 million home in Beverly Hills, and your kids have access to excellent schools where they can rub shoulders with the kids of the rich and famous. Quite a deal for the savvy and well-informed parent.
https://www.trulia.com/for_rent/0604830_sd/
intercst