I hate calling spent nuclear fuel “waste”, since it is useful for so many things. But I guess “waste” is the term we are supposed to use.
A novel process called radiation-enhanced electrolysis could boost hydrogen production by up to tenfold, offering a highly efficient route to convert hazardous nuclear waste into a clean energy source. This is a key finding from a new comprehensive review by scientists at the University of Sharjah, published in the journal Nuclear Engineering and Design.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I don’t know much about this specific technology, but it makes sense that it would be easier to split water molecules in a radiation field. This is called radiolysis, as opposed to electrolysis, which is usually used for green hydrogen production.
Despite the potential, the researchers identified significant obstacles hindering progress. The “most significant obstacle,” they argue, is the stringent regulatory framework imposed on accessing and handling radioactive materials.
The authors claim that “strict regulations hinder innovation,” forcing most researchers to use external radiation sources to simulate the effects of radioactive waste. This, they maintain, “may compromise the accuracy and real-world applicability of the findings.”
Other challenges include the risk of syngas contamination and chemical modification of the catalysts.
I’m pro-nuke. But the “stringent regulatory framework” is important. If it’s an impediment, tough. This stuff is highly dangerous, and the framework minimizes the chance of mishandling or mistakes. Or deliberate dispersal (e.g. “dirty bomb”).