Billionaire[s] Afraid of Losing Control

Washington Post today

New York City billionaire John Catsimatidis has long been immersed in politics. But last year the Republican real estate and oil tycoon donated more money than he ever had before — $2.4 million to support Donald Trump and congressional Republicans, nearly twice as much as he gave in 2016.

Catsimatidis said he feels a growing urgency to try to influence the course of American politics, given the wide divergence between the two parties.

“If you’re a billionaire, you want to stay a billionaire,” said Catsimatidis, whose net worth is estimated at $4.5 billion. It’s not just about his own wealth, he said, adding, “I worry about America and the way of life we have.”

LOL yeah right

In an era defined by major political divisions and massive wealth accumulation for the richest Americans, billionaires are spending unprecedented amounts on U.S. politics. Dozens have stepped up their political giving in recent years, leading to a record-breaking surge of donations by the ultrarich in 2024. Since 2000, political giving by the wealthiest 100 Americans to federal elections has gone up almost 140 times, well outpacing the growing costs of campaigns, a Washington Post analysis found.

Why?
Well it’s not just the plebes under financial distress.
https://www.wsj.com/personal-finance/the-middle-class-is-buckling-under-almost-five-years-of-persistent-inflation-4d783aee

The Middle Class Is Buckling Under Almost Five Years of Persistent Inflation

Workers growing tired of economy in which everything seems to get more expensive

The American middle class encompasses a broad cross section of workers that includes white-collar office employees, nurses and plumbers, although there is no universally accepted definition.

Pew Research Center defines the middle class broadly as having a household income between about $66,666 and $200,000, depending on where they live. Perpetual sticker shock is making many within the group feel worse about both their own finances and the future of the country. They are hunting for bargains and spending more carefully.

Fast-food restaurant Wingstop said this month that middle-income diners have now joined lower-income ones in dialing back purchases. Target reported slumping sales and said customers are spending cautiously on discretionary items such as home decor and apparel. Walmart, meanwhile, posted strong sales as consumers from all income groups flocked to the retailer’s value.

I dunno. Isn’t stagflation a combination of inflation & recession. At least that is how I remember the 1970’s? How about you geezers & geezettes?

4 Likes

As a card-carrying geezette :wink: I can remember the late 1970s and early 1980s as a stagflation time where 5% inflation was considered low and the unemployment rate (after 1980) was 8% for a very long time. That’s stagflation.

Wendy

6 Likes

STAGnation + inFLATION = STAGFLATION.

Carternomics!

The Captain

Nixon/Ford brought us stagflation, not Carter.

7 Likes

Using the misery index (inflation rate + unemployment rate) as a rough surrogate for stagflation, there were two peaks – 1974/5 and 1979/80. Both were closely related to oil shocks, the OPEC oil embargo and later Iran.

DB2

2 Likes

It began in 1973 with the OPEC oil embargo. Carter was inaugurated in January, 1977.

Jerry Ford wins the award for the most feckless anti-inflation program in history, distributing “WIN” (“Whip Inflation Now”) buttons, and doing virtually nothing else. Asking people (who don’t set the prices) to do something (lower prices) over which they have no control was widely mocked at the time. And still today. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Carter actually did something about inflation, appointing Volcker to the Fed, knowing that he would raise interest rates dramatically. It cost Jimmy the job, obviously, but it was the right thing to do. To be fair, he had first appointed William Miller as Fed head, but when it was clear he wasn’t doing anything he was shown the door and Volcker got the job. He says he told Carter what would have to happen, but Carter said “Go ahead.”

Reagan reaped the benefit, as he did with Carter’s deregulation of airlines, telecommunications, trucking and more. To this day most people think Reagan did that - but that’s not true. Again in fairness, Reagan inherited the two recessions that Volcker’s policies engendered, but they happened early enough in his term that he didn’t get tarred with them, and they were gone by the time his reelection was due. Energy prices also cratered, which helped the economy, and Reagan got credit for that, too.

6 Likes

There are no oil shocks currently. We are in living in a oil glut globally. Long term outlook for oil is down, down, down.

Carter is the most underrated president and Reagan is the most overrated president.

8 Likes

OPEC did not embargo. The Arab members of OPEC did embargo. Venezuela was more than happy to continue selling oil to all comers.

It is untrue that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an oil embargo [“Will Oil Be Cut Off Again?” Business, May 16].

Arab countries, some of them members of OPEC, embargoed oil exports to the United States and other countries in 1973, but Venezuela and other OPEC members pushed their production to the maximum to compensate for the supply cuts from the Arab sources.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2002/05/25/venezuelas-oil-flow/850364f7-97a2-41db-b4b0-9a179dff10d8/

The Captain

2 Likes