Their PE is now 12. Their rate of growth of earnings is (as we just pointed out) 104%.
Their rate of growth in 2016 will certainly be MUCH lower, but on the other hand their PE is only 12.
Saul,
P/E and PEG look excellent. But they are backward looking. Looking at the past 3 quarters, there has been zero sequential growth so when you say that growth will be MUCH lower do you mean it could be zero?
Chris