Introducing Astera Labs (ALAB)

@intjudo Thanks for the feedback!

I actually had Credo next up to look into after that Marvell earnings that came out to understand the competitive landscape better. Credo is reporting earnings this week on September 4. There’s a few reasons I wouldn’t invest in Credo or strongly prefer investing in Astera,

  • On their last earnings (May 29), they had guided for 59-62M revenue and came in at 60.8M
  • Next quarter they guided for only 58-61M or 2% sequential decline - Astera is projecting 24-30% sequential growth
  • They have a legacy business and their AI portion of the business is still ramping
  • Credo was founded in 2008 before AI/cloud - Astera was founded in 2017 with cloud/AI in mind and already has more revenue
  • Credo has 25M in inventory, while they are fabless, I believe they take delivery themselves whereas Astera integrates their product in without taking the inventory delivery
  • Credo was asked about Astera and Marvell on the call and they said they are confident in their solution - this is in contrast to Astera saying they put competitors out of business with their software and competitors are using their software to debug their own issues
  • Credo has lower gross margins than Astera
  • Credo has ~400M in cash, Astera has ~800M
  • Credo has 500 employees, Astera has less than 300

I was looking into the Blackwell GB200 specs trying to wrap my head around how Astera plays into the Nvidia solutions. Interesting that the GB200 does have include a “PCIe Gen 6 Bandwidth Bidirectional - 2x 256 GB/s Gen6”

I think this is what Astera is taking about with Nvidia transitioning to Gen6 PCIe. This may be the way that the Aries product interfaces with Blackwell.

I’m still trying to track down how Nvidia themselves is a customer of Astera. There seems to be little information about what products they are buying, but the hardware manufacturers like to maintain confidentiality so they don’t reveal their product specs to competitors.

9 Likes

Well, for me complex is bad and understanding is paramount. Here’s what I’ve been able to gather:

  1. Astera Labs mostly (almost entirely?) sells to the big cloud providers (aka “hyperscalers”) building out infrastruture, both AI and general purpose.
  2. When Astera talks about “third party accelerators” they’re talking Nividia, and AMD, Intel, etc…
  3. When Astera talks about “internally developed accelerators” they’re talking about companies developing their own AI chips, like Amazon and Google and Tesla are. I don’t know that any of them are customers, though.
  4. Astera Labs’ products are sold both for AI-centric as well as traditional general purpose computing systems, but it appears AI is the growth market.
  5. They have networking/connectivity products in 3 technology areas:
    • PCI Express
    • Ethernet
    • Compute Express Link (CXL)

From what I can tell, CXL is not currently a revenue stream, as CXL 2.0 CPUs haven’t launched yet. Maybe a 2025 thing.

Ethernet has its own set of competitive issues I think. From Nvidia’s own Spectrum-X to companies like Broadcom and others on the upcoming Ultra Ethernet standard. That isn’t to say that Astera Labs isn’t itself competitive in this area, it seems to be.

Which leaves us with PCI Express products. The new PCIe standard, known as Gen6, is coming, and Astera Labs appears to be on the forefront there. However, the concern right now is whether Nvidia’s Blackwell processors will be good or bad for Astera Labs use. I read the Morgan Stanley 07Aug note on ALAB, and found this:

When NVIDIA ramps rack-scale products next year, retimer content declines, as many of the connections currently using PCI express will move to NVIDIA’s proprietary NVLink standard. For an 8 GPU server today, there are 8-14 PCIe retimers, but for NVL72 or NVL36 that number should go down to 1 or 2. This was a known issue at the time of the IPO, but expectations for the rack-scale products have continued to grow.

Note that “NVL36” and “NVL72” are new rack-scale products from Nvidia. The NVL72 combines 36 Grace CPUs and 72 Blackwell GPUs in a single liquid-cooled rack. It uses Nvidia’s propietary NVLink connectivity internally that enables it to acts as a single massive GPU and delivers 30X faster real-time trillion-parameter LLM inference. The NVL36 is half that size.

From Morgan Stanley:

Astera can’t really address this situation directly as it involves non-public customer information, but they reiterated their confidence that they will gain content on a per GPU basis for the Blackwell platform. That makes sense, as away from NVL72 we see an increasing number of PCIe lanes and thus retimers per server.

We certainly believe the company will gain content per Blackwell, but in order to outgrow NVIDIA, it will need to be substantial as we see Nvidia increasing price per card by nearly 40% already.

Morgan Stanley’s summary is:

Astera offers the best growth rates in our coverage, with multiple product cycles and a very strong position in key AI technology. There is also a scarcity of small cap assets with these exposures. The stock has been very weak as of late, with concerns over potential content in Nvidia rack-scale solutions. We trust management and acknowledge they aren’t able to talk specifics, but the issue has weighed on the stock.

We are lowering our multiple to 17x sales (previously 33x), which reflects compression in the AI space and some remaining risk on future Nvidia content. Our new price target is $55 as sales come up from $445mn to $520mn. This is a premium to large caps (NVDA 14x and AVGO 12x), but we note that there is a dearth of small cap assets with this exposure given that over 80% of ALAB’s revenue is directly driven by AI cloud spending, and they has the highest growth in our coverage. We stay EW on some remaining content growth uncertainties, but note that we view this name more favorably after the pullback.

Here’s a video of Astera Labs PCIExpress product(s):

They’re demonstrating a 7 meter copper cable where as the competition they claim is at a 3 meter limit. Their rationale is that as companies want to build out AI capacity, they’re limited in what they can do within a single rack by power limitations, and their products enable high speed coupling of multiple racks.

I don’t personally understand this portion of the AI market well enough to know which company’s tech is best, nor how well Astera Labs is tied into the hyperscalers, nor what Nvidia has is doing with Blackwell to create or remove opportunities for third parties on the hyperscaler AI build-out.

24 Likes

What I was trying to get at is that success in this business is going to depend on the company’s ability to innovate and adapt to new standards as they arise in the industry. Astera’s software based approach allows them to find bottlenecks in the data center and build products based off feedback from hyperscalers.

I was looking at the Morgan Stanley report you are mentioning and was expecting them to make a bear case based off the quotes above, but they also had this in the report,

“Astera had a strong quarter, with a strong outlook that surpassed our expectations”

Morgan Stanley had estimated this would be their upcoming guidance last quarter,

Morgan Stanley estimate of Astera’s guide
Revenue: 81.2M
Gross Margin: 74.1%
EPS: 0.09

Astera’s actual guide (midpoint)
Revenue: 97.5M
Gross Margin: 75%
EPS: 0.17

The guide which Astera provided has revenue 16.3M higher than Morgan Stanley thought or 20% higher, and on EPS they are projecting an extra eight cents of earnings or 89% higher.

They also said this, most of which are direct quotes,

  • broadening deployments from hyperscaler ASIC ramps
  • product upgrade cycles that bring higher silicon content
  • “they reiterated their confidence that they will gain content on a per GPU basis for the Blackwell platform” (this is where MS points out content to be higher on B100/B200 but lower on GB200 NVL72)
  • “the company will also add content on active cable side for some Blackwell customers”
  • Gen 6 will be a catalyst for increasing retimer content and there are growing applications for PCIe like multi-rack GPU clustering and PCIe optical
  • Taurus 400G modules have shifted into volume production and are expected to ramp into the second half of 2024
  • Astera has close partnerships with various hyperscalers which allows them to be on the forefront of connectivity trends
  • “we think the pipeline of their announced products will be driving strong long term growth”
  • MS estimated this past quarter to be 74M revenue and came in at 76.9M, adj EPS was estimated to be 0.11 and came in at 0.13
  • We had previously modeled 176% top line growth in 2024. We now model revenue revenues increasing 203% yoy given strong PCIe retimer outlook and the start of the Taurus ramp”
  • our adj EPS estimate for 2024 increases to 0.57 from 0.40
  • raising FY 2025 estimate from 445M to 520M
  • Morgan Stanley’s “equal-weight thesis”, “Large AI exposure, agnostic to processors, with an early incumbency advantage

Yet after making all those points Morgan Stanley lowered the price target from $85/share to $55 and maintains a neutral position on the company. Of 12 analysts which cover Astera, there’s five strong buys, six buys, and one neutral (Morgan Stanley).

16 Likes

FWIW: Morgan Stanley published an upgrade to Overweight, but with the same price target of $55 per share.

6 Likes

Morgan Stanley explains a bit about what they see. I’ll paraphrase rather than quote long sections:

The new BG200 rack configurations from Nvidia (NVL36 & NVL72) replace prior models’ use of PCIExpress for CPU to GPU connections with Nvidia’s own NVLink. Since Astera makes most of their money on PCIExpress products (eg the “retimers”), Astera Labs may sell less product.

Now, it is possible that even without Astera Labs’ retimers for CPU to GPU connections, there will still be a need to connect storage as well as to connect to outside server racks, both for which PCIExpress would likely be used, hence a viable market for Astera Labs.

Here’s a quote indicating the known unknowns:

While Astera cannot answer the GB200 content question directly given sensitivities on customer’s roadmaps, they are confident that their growth trajectory remains strong and content will increase on a per GPU basis going forward.

In addition, as the hyperscalers ramp up their own Ai chip-making efforts (Amazon, Google, Meta, etc.), those solutions will not use Nvidia’s NVLink and so will likely have a higher PCIExpress content, which helps Astera.

Sounds like this company may do well, but does it have a 5X potential in the next few years?

16 Likes