Sadly, stock-market skeptics never offer this kind of analysis.
“Lies, damned lies, and statistics” is a phrase describing the persuasive power of numbers, particularly the use of statistics to bolster weak arguments. It is also sometimes colloquially used to doubt statistics used to prove an opponent’s point.
The term was popularised in United States by Mark Twain (among others), who attributed it to the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli*: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” However, the phrase is not found in any of Disraeli’s works and the earliest known appearances were years after his death**. Several other people have been listed as originators of the quote, and it is often erroneously attributed to Twain himself.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statist…
There is something else that no one points out, all these comparisons are just correlations with no proof of causation. Why did the bond market outperform the stock market from 1966 to 2008?
But Rob Arnott did a study which showed that if you had bought a 20 year Treasury bond in 1966 and rolled it over every year, you would have done better than the S&P through December 2008, 42 years, which is one of those interesting facts.
Try correlating bond yields with interest rates over the same period:
Historical Prime Rate Graph
http://www.forecast-chart.com/interest-prime-interest.html
No matter how hard they try zero is as low as interest rates can get. Just how valuable is “Rob Arnott’s interesting fact?”
BTW, Black Monday 1987 did not repeat on the 30th anniversary. On October 19, 2017 the S&P 500 was up $0.84, 0.03%. One curious fact about this non-event: Those who brought it up as a prediction never bothered to say afterwards that it didn’t happen.
There is one truth I can state with no reservations, “we can’t predict the future.” What can we do about it? Try “Dhandho investing” or lose a little when you lose and win big when you win. Here is what TMF had to say:
Foolish Book Review: “The Dhandho Investor”
Whatever you do, don’t follow the investing framework laid out in this book.
David Meier (TMFHumbleServant) Jun 29, 2007 at 12:00AM
Whatever you do, don’t follow the investing framework laid out in this book. It will make my job as an investor that much more difficult because you’ll be much more competitive.
OK, that’s not completely fair. After all, one of the goals at The Motley Fool is to help you become a better investor. And that’s exactly what The Dhandho Investor by money manager Mohnish Pabrai can do. But be forewarned: Pabrai gives us the recipe, but we have to determine the ingredients we’ll need to make the dish.
https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/06/29/foolish-bo…
My version for “win big” is to invest in fast growth. My version for “lose a little” is to have a sturdy portfolio that is not likely to enter into a chain reaction meltdown.
But what about all those dire predictions? Put it down to entertainment.
Denny Schlesinger
The Dhandho Investor: The Low-Risk Value Method to High Returns Hardcover – April 6, 2007
by Mohnish Pabrai
https://www.amazon.com/Dhandho-Investor-Low-Risk-Method-Retu…
My 2007 book review
Who is your audience, Mr. Pabrai?
https://www.amazon.com/review/R1PQRZNVETG2WW/ref=cm_cr_srp_d…