Facebook seems to me like Amazon, especially the Amazon of several years ago - a stock that mostly goes up, and should do so for years. I recently decided to buy a small amount (maybe $2000). Saul must have a reason not to buy, and I’m wondering what it is. Is there a discussion of FB here that I’ve missed?
I agree that Skechers is likely a better value in quantitative measures, but FB is so overwhelming with its name recognition and tendency to grow income every quarter. And the market will be more forgiving of the occasional stumble. We need to watch SKX like hawks, and buy on the dips. With FB, I think you could buy almost any time there hasn’t been a crazy spike.
Other mega-growth stocks:
Google/Alphabet is similar to FB, but has already grown so much over more years, so its percentage growth should be less than FB. Same for Apple. Netflix is the most problematic of the FANG stocks, with its gigantic P/E and heavy move into original programming. TSLA - great world-changing story, but huge valuation and no profit yet. AMZN has already been talked to death, and I can never find a good price entry point. It’s like a nice car whose sticker price keeps going up, so I buy something else. (This has actually happened to me more than once years ago, when Hondas were always pricier than Mazdas for very similar cars.)
That leaves FB, unless someone can name something even more likely to win big and often in the not-too-distant and longer-term future. Maybe Starbucks, with its expansion into food?
The main obstacles for FB that I see are when everybody is already using it so much that they forget to eat and have a life, or advertising is saturated and has to be cut back to keep users happy, or ad blocking gets strong enough to make a real difference.
Comic relief:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LcOKQg2Gbc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8xbgdw9uvY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3NmVLYR5pg