Smorgasbord1,
b&w, I’m interested in absolute rate of return, not relative
I think you mean you are interested in relative not absolute rate of return.
Andy
Hi Chris:
Another question I asked, how do you feel about MLP ETFs. Any thoughts?
Personally I stay away from the MLP funds. I prefer the individual companies. MLP’s are a tax shelter and therefor belong in a taxable account and all their distributions are tax deferred. There is sometimes a limited amount of income that is taxable but so far not much. MMP is a good company which translates into a low yield of 4.2%
I own 3 MLP’s
ETE I own about 12 years Yields about 6.159%. One of their subsidiaries is building the DAPL in North Dakoda where they just had the Protest by the indians holding up the completion. It appears the pipeline will get the final go ahead–AGAIN–to complete the pipeline. Should be a massive positive for the company. (5th largest holding)
MPLX–I owned MWE for about 13 years big winner- 5.53% yield MWE merged with MPLX (A subsidiary of Marathon Petroleum Corp) and I’ve been adding ever since (Largest holding in portfolio)
EVA -I own 1 1/2 years 8.56% yield–Clean energy-Wood pellets.
1 Like
I think you mean you are interested in relative not absolute rate of return.
No, I meant what I said. B&W said he did 24.84% better in 2016 than 2015, but since I don’t know what his returns were in 2015 that doesn’t help me decide if I want a portfolio like his.
1 Like
Hi Smorgasbord
No, I meant what I said. B&W said he did 24.84% better in 2016 than 2015, but since I don’t know what his returns were in 2015 that doesn’t help me decide if I want a portfolio like his.
Portfolio income was 8.59% higher in 2015 than 2014.
I assume that you are aware that all the numbers and percentages that I have listed are after all my living expenses-donations-gifts and TAXES are removed from the portfolios. Remember I have no pension- and only limited SS due to income. As I mentioned previously 2017 income is projected to be about double my currently increasing cost of living. That means about 50% of the income received will be reinvested for additional income and the balance will be removed for expenses (OF ALL KINDS-INCLUDING TAXES)
And I am sure you noticed that I haven’t said one word about Capital gains or price appreciation so far in this post.
That is another moving part to my portfolio that you might want to consider --Since the Nov 8, 2016 Election, my income oriented portfolio has had capital appreciation of 13.343%
Best Regards
b&w
1 Like
Portfolio income was 8.59% higher in 2015 than 2014.
I believe that his point is we have no idea what the baseline is here. 8.59% higher is a very different number if your income in 2014 was 1% of your portfolio than if it was 10% or 20%.
And, just to make sure that we are on the same page, are you saying that:
PortfolioIncome = Total Gains - ExpensesEtc.
?
And, just to make sure that we are on the same page, are you saying that:
PortfolioIncome = Total Gains - ExpensesEtc.
I’ve been intrigued by all of these posts. I think the key point many of us are trying to understand is what percentage of the portfolio is thrown off as income. It doesn’t matter if this year’s percentage was greater than or less than last year’s percentage.
The problem here is that the portfolio is constantly changing in value. So maybe we can use just one point in time…let’s say the beginning of the year.
So, the question for B&W is the following. What is the income you received in 2016 divided by the value of your portfolio to start 2016?
Am I looking at this too simply?
A.J.
2 Likes
So, the question for B&W is the following. What is the income you received in 2016 divided by the value of your portfolio to start 2016?
I have answered that question on this board at least once and maybe more.
Here is the answer again if you missed it or never read it because you entered the thread in the middle
====The income received in 2016 divided by the value of the portfolio to start 2016 is 7.17%====
Am I looking at this too simply?
I believe you all are. The point is —The growth of the portfolio over the past 13 1/2 years has produced an income for me today that is more than double my needs after paying all my bills for the entire 13 1/2 years. the portfolio in the 13 1/2 time frame is currently 13 times the original value and that is after deducting all my various expenses for all the years that currently total 3 1/2 times the original value.
The excess income above my needs are reinvested to produce even more income to cover inflation and any higher expenses that become necessary.
b&w
And, just to make sure that we are on the same page, are you saying that:
PortfolioIncome = Total Gains - ExpensesEtc.
How about if we do it this way.
1)Let’s say Portfolio Income is all dividends/distributions received during the calendar year
2)Expenses are anything I spend during the same year
3)My total expenses are currently running less than 50% my portfolio income
4)The excess income received above the “less than 50% spent” is reinvested into additional shares to grow the portfolio and further increase the income to cover coming increases in the cost of living I anticipate for the future.
Best regards
b&w
B&W,
Apologies for missing the 7.17% income before.
That is all I wanted to know and the rest makes sense to me.
It all still boils down to picking the right investments, no matter what path you choose - growth, income, etc…
And that ain’t easy, but it’s not impossible either.
Thanks,
AJ
AJ:
It all still boils down to picking the right investments, no matter what path you choose - growth, income, etc…
And that ain’t easy, but it’s not impossible either.
You are right it ain’t easy but not impossible—But IT IS EASIER THAN YOU THINK.
Your problem and most others have the same problem–Is you are trying to find the PERFECT STOCK AND YOU STUDY THE HISTORY AND somewhere along the line you decide THIS IS IT=THIS is the one I’m going to put my money in- And actually what has happened -A number of people with different objectives have looked at one stock and all have convinced each other that it is the greatest stock. My question the greatest for WHO??? The company or THE GREATEST FOR YOU???
ANY stock I buy COULD MAKE ME A MILLION DOLLARS OR MORE if it works out-- However When I start to buy it. all I’m buying is 100-200-300 shares and it pays a growing dividend . As time goes on as it proves itself in my portfolio I allocate additional cash. If it doesn’t make me money it gets no more money from me and if necessary it gets sold. Stocks that perform get additional monies For example-Take HASI as an example. I own it in 4 accounts-but we’ll talk about 1 because they are similar I started buying HASI on Feb 9, 2015 at $14.31 In the 2 years since I have added 17 more cash purchases plus 4 dividends were dripped and cash taken for the others in that account. Stocks like this will move the needle of my portfolio while an AMZN and Chipolte and AAPL will not. If I’m wrong along the way I will sell probably have a big chunk of change to move on to something new.
The questions you have to ask yourself–How many shares of an AMZN will you buy at $850 and are you willing to stomach a $30 loss per day for a few days? And if it doubles in price HOW MUCH WILL YOU MAKE BASED ON THE LIMITED NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED-No income is paid along the way so the only thing you can hope for is capital gains. HASI on the other hand has paid me about 12% in the 2 years which I have added additional shares. HASI and the other securities in my portfolio have collectively paid all my bills for those 2 years–Even if I have to take a loss down the road I have at least the 12% additional share as a cushion.
I believe dividends/distributions are more stable than share price. If a company cuts the dividend it is an important move. Share prices can fluctuate 10%-20% or more and could be only street noise.
Best regards
b&w
5 Likes
I started buying HASI on Feb 9, 2015 at $14.31 In the 2 years since I have added 17 more cash purchases plus 4 dividends were dripped and cash taken for the others in that account. Stocks like this will move the needle of my portfolio while an AMZN and Chipolte and AAPL will not.
HASI closed today at $18.35, up $4.04 (29.6%) since then, plus it’s paid dividends totaling $2.31. I don’t have a DRIP calculator handy, so I’ll be generous and say the full $2.31 is also up 29%, which makes another $0.67. That totals up to 49%.
So, better than CMG of course. And, better than AAPL, even with its dividends DRIPped. But, not better than Saul-stock AMZN, which is up 116% since Feb 9,2015. That really moved the needle.
And if it doubles in price HOW MUCH WILL YOU MAKE BASED ON THE LIMITED NUMBER OF SHARES OWNED-No income is paid along the way so the only thing you can hope for is capital gains.
“Limited number of shares owned” is not an argument. One can say the thing about any stock, whether dividend paying or not. That’s why we talk AAR (Average Annual Return) as a metric that let’s us compare how well vastly different portfolios do. Perhaps I’m missing something, but it seems pretty clear to me that making 116% in 2 years is better than making 49% in the same 2 years.
As for “income along the way,” you can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can either DRIP or you can take the dividends to live on, but not both - at least with the same money - and have the same returns. AMZN doesn’t pay dividends, but you can sell share to pay your living expenses. Yes, that hurts your returns, but then so does not DRIPing dividends.
I believe it’s a question of perspective and time frame. Some companies pay profits as dividends because they don’t have better uses for that money, except to buy back stock (which involves less commitment than paying dividends). Apple’s in that boat, having more money than they have imagination. Other companies, like Amazon, reinvest their profits into new businesses that will accelerate the company’s growth and future profits.
I understand the appeal of dividend paying stocks. It’s the bird in the hand, and so is appropriate for people who can’t or don’t want to take on as much risk in their portfolio. But, beware that along with the potential advantages of DRIP in a dividend paying stock, there is also the risk that your “If I’m wrong along the way I will sell probably have a big chunk of change to move on to something new” statement ignores the risk that if you’re wrong, the stock could actually decrease in value, perhaps even wiping out the gains you made via dividends.
There are many investment strategies from which to choose, and that’s good. Some are not appropriate for some investors, and it’s fine to point that out. But, saying that AMZN wouldn’t have moved the needle in one’s portfolio in the past two years just isn’t true.
17 Likes
So, better than CMG of course. And, better than AAPL, even with its dividends DRIPped. But, not better than Saul-stock AMZN, which is up 116% since Feb 9,2015. That really moved the needle.
How much of that 116% AMZN appreciation were you able to corral into your portfolio? Was that 116% the movement of your portfolio’s needle or AMZN’s needle? Did Bezos make that 116% or did you?
The important metric for me is that in 13 1/2 years my ENTIRE portfolio is up 13 times after paying all my bills. I guess that’s unimportant for many here because they have as good or better results over the same time frame. I would be interested in hearing the portfolio results of others over that time frame if you are willing to share.
b&w
According to Standard & Poor’s, the dividend component was responsible for 44 % of the total return of the last 80 years of the index.
http://www.simplestockinvesting.com/SP500-historical-real-to…
This site has excellent with and with out dividend graphs of the S&P 500 and also with inflation adjusted.
There’s no arguing that dividend reinvestment works well. It’s just that typical dividend paying stocks do not usually have very good price growth. They are usually more steady stocks compared to the growth stocks that may have much higher price appreciation, but also have the large swings in performance.
They say politics is local, well investing is personal. It depends on your tolerance for risk and your time frame of interest.
Good luck to all whatever path you use. Just own it.
4 Likes
ANY stock I buy COULD MAKE ME A MILLION DOLLARS OR MORE if it works out-- However When I start to buy it. all I’m buying is 100-200-300 shares and it pays a growing dividend . As time goes on as it proves itself in my portfolio I allocate additional cash. If it doesn’t make me money it gets no more money from me and if necessary it gets sold. Stocks that perform get additional monies For example-Take HASI as an example. I own it in 4 accounts-but we’ll talk about 1 because they are similar I started buying HASI on Feb 9, 2015 at $14.31 In the 2 years since I have added 17 more cash purchases plus 4 dividends were dripped and cash taken for the others in that account. Stocks like this will move the needle of my portfolio while an AMZN and Chipolte and AAPL will not. If I’m wrong along the way I will sell probably have a big chunk of change to move on to something new.
B&W,
2 points:
-
Let me edit to make that last sentence more clear: “If I’m wrong along the way I will sell AND LOSE MONEY.” I’m happy for you that you have been able to grow your portfolio however many times over the last several years, but recognize that if you had picked different stocks you might very well have LOST money over that time period. It doesn’t much matter if your stock pays a dividend or not if shares crater 50% or something. It’s the same as if that happens to AMZN or CMG. I’m glad you’ve done well, but there’s no magic in the method. You must have just chosen the individual stocks well.
-
To misquote Acts 19:15, “XOM I know, and KO I know, but who is HASI?” I agree that dividends can be a nice, safe, less volatile strategy than growth stocks. It’s what I’ve helped my dad do to reduce risk, and it’s been great. But you have to distinguish between the risk in blue chip companies who are almost certainly going to be around for years and years, and the risk in companies no one has heard of. It’s completely believable that you’ve done your homework and totally understand what you’re doing. You just haven’t displayed that on these boards. You say to stay away from the darlings of wall street, but when someone asks about one of your stocks like HASI you say “go do your own research.”
Bear
3 Likes
Was that 116% the movement of your portfolio’s needle or AMZN’s needle? Did Bezos make that 116% or did you?
B&W, apparently you’ve been successful, which is great, but you’re just carrying this argument too far. The objective measurement is that for the past couple/few years, AMZN has had better returns than HASI.
I’m not knocking your returns, it seems like you’re doing really well, exceeding an CAGR of 21% for those 13.5 years, which is great.
Paul:
1) Let me edit to make that last sentence more clear: “If I’m wrong along the way I will sell AND LOSE MONEY.” I’m happy for you that you have been able to grow your portfolio however many times over the last several years, but recognize that if you had picked different stocks you might very well have LOST money over that time period. It doesn’t much matter if your stock pays a dividend or not if shares crater 50% or something. It’s the same as if that happens to AMZN or CMG. I’m glad you’ve done well, but there’s no magic in the method. You must have just chosen the individual stocks well.
You can interpret anything anyway you want But let’s be clear. From time to time stock selections have not performed up to my expectations and I have sold them --AT A LOSS— MY portfolio results to date include the winners-the losers and the ugly and those results are after deducting the losses and the cash I have removed over the years to pay my bills. To say dividends don’t matter is incorrect because dividends have represented 44% of all portfolio growth over the past 80 years. Stocks that pay dividends that are reinvested or spent is free money or stock (If the distribution is tax deferred) that decreases your investment cost. If you receive enough income along the way your cost basis can approach or reach “ZERO” while you still own the stock and it keeps generating more cash to be invested or spent and the market value can keep increasing. That is not the same as investing in AMZN CMG AAPL GOOG or other stocks you “know” that pay very little or nothing and you are dependent upon the capital appreciation to be there when you need the money (less capital gain taxes). If we are in a Bear market and stocks are down 50%, I would rather take my chances and have my portfolio with stocks that have a “Zero Cost Basis” or close to it that have been paying my bills for years
2) To misquote Acts 19:15, “XOM I know, and KO I know, but who is HASI?” I agree that dividends can be a nice, safe, less volatile strategy than growth stocks. It’s what I’ve helped my dad do to reduce risk, and it’s been great. But you have to distinguish between the risk in blue chip companies who are almost certainly going to be around for years and years, and the risk in companies no one has heard of. It’s completely believable that you’ve done your homework and totally understand what you’re doing. You just haven’t displayed that on these boards. You say to stay away from the darlings of wall street, but when someone asks about one of your stocks like HASI you say “go do your own research.”
XOM and KO also can be very volatile over time. They shake people out just like Kodak and Polaroid and all the newspapers and a lot of Department stores and shopping malls.
You say— You don’t know who is HASI-- THAT’s YOUR FAULT not mine. I’ve been writing about it for about 2 or 3 months now and you’ve been writing me about it I told you it occupies 18.4% of my portfolio. HASI is a public company for about 4 years They have been in business as a private company for over 30 years. They are in the “Green Energy” business they have increased their dividend each year since going public.(They are a REIT)
Another “Green Energy” security I own is EVA (They are an MLP)
I have disclosed my portfolio and the results I have achieved so far. I suggested that anyone interested in any of the securities that they “Do their own research” which everyone should do anyway. I don’t know what your goals or needs are. Maybe you are doing better than me. Wonderful-I’m glad for you. Maybe you are right and dividends aren’t for you
But please don’t tell me dividends don’t mean anything. Maybe they mean nothing to you, but I live off of them and they pay all my bills for the past 13 1/2 years and for all the growth of my portfolio over that same time.
Best regards
b&w
1 Like
Here’s my issue with the whole HASI situation. There’s very little public information out there compared to some stocks. Why did HASI drop 1% on Friday, while the rest of the market was up 1%? Every REIT I own was up, even the high risk MORL and CEFL were up. What news or situation caused the price to drop on an up day like that?
Secondly, why is it trading 8% under its secondary offering price of $20 a share from a few weeks ago? Based on your understanding of it, is the current price of $18.35 a share a decent entry point for both stock price appreciation and dividend growth?
B&W, there are a lot of good REITs out there to choose from, including the SWANs (sleep well at night) that Brad Thomas and others pick. Why should someone put money into HASI, instead of OHI, SOHO, or some of the other options? What made you pick it, and how did you evaluate it’s financials (FFO, debt-level, dividend growth history, etc).
Also, if you do sell the losers and just add to winners, aren’t you just chasing past performance? Blindly doing that without understanding the entire business you are invested in can lead to financial catastrophe.
4 Likes
There’s very little public information out there compared to some stocks. Why did HASI drop 1% on Friday, while the rest of the market was up 1%?
Let’s be fair here - the daily gyrations of a stock aren’t worth considering.
As for other information, here’s a link to HASI insider buying: https://www.holdingschannel.com/insider-buying/hasi-insider-… and for both buys and sells: http://www.insider-monitor.com/trading/cik1561894.html
Lots more Insider Buys than Sells of HASI by various directors and C-level execs. That’s a very bullish sign. Only the CFO has been selling - the President & CEO, Exec VP, a Director, General Counsel & EVP have all been buying since 2013.
That said, it does seem Mr. Market is mixed on what to expect from HASI. The stock price peaked last Sept and has been on a downtrend ever since.
Welgard,
Can you please provide a link to the REIT SWAN’s, or tell me where to find them? Presently I am working on the dividend portion of my portfolio and this information would be most appreciated.
Kindest Regards,
Steve
Look up Brad Thomas on Seeking Alpha, and read a bunch of his articles. Most in-depth articles I’ve seen in a while on REITs. He has some articles about the SWAN REITs, which might not have the high mid-teens dividends that some do, but have a lot less risk and can be bought and sat on for years.
1 Like