Macro Conditions and Some of Our Companies

This is what Prince actually said and I’d argue that Zscaler is who he was talking about…leading Cloudflare to actually take share in this current market.

Matthew Prince

“I think at the conference, people were pretty pessimistic. And I think that the mood, especially in Europe right now is that the world does it war both literally, but also figuratively. And I think that we are in for a difficult next few years. In our last earnings call, we said Q1 of 2022 was by far the hardest quarter we have seen since Q1 of 2020, which was the COVID quarter. And I think one of the things that was – is unique about us is because our sales cycles are so fast measured in less than a quarter typically. That let us see some of the kind of early warning signs late in 2021 and early in 2022. And that’s allowed us to adjust and adapt. But I think companies that may have looked like they were doing very well in Q1 that have longer sales cycles, you are going to start to see them having pipeline problems in Q2, Q3, Q4. And so I think what has always been a real strength of Cloudflare has been that because we see things early and our feedback cycles are so fast, we can adapt to that. But there is – but anyone who tells you – sits up here and tells you that they are not having to adapt how they are marketing, how they are going to market, how they are closing deals, how they are getting new logos, how they are getting new customers, doesn’t have their business instrumented as we do.”

Best,

Jason

30 Likes

Also I have one question BTL, when you said…
Prince also talked about having an “all-hands” meeting to tell employees to focus on what NET is good at. I presume this is an effort to cut down on expenses for a lot of NET’s tools, which is sort of against the NET culture of innovate at all costs. Not sure this new version of NET culture will work.

We’re you talking about when Mathew Prince, CEO of Cloudflare said this, “ And one of the core values at Cloudflare – the three core values of Cloudflare, transparency, curiosity and being principled, right. And we really believe in those things. But transparency, which internally, like I am on Thursday, going to give an all hands meeting where I’m going to say, guys, the world is getting really hard and that’s going to have to force us to really think about the places in our business where we are not world class and tighten up those places.”

Cause, again I think that this can be understood to mean something different than what you might have been saying in your post, and in context of the over all conference does mean, that Prince intends to be world class in everything that they do. That this might mean more pressure on those that work at Cloudflare in those areas not yet quite there…hmm. Maybe?

Thanks,

Jason

11 Likes

Thank you all for the insights and feedback.

I have to say that Matthew Prince has been always harsh and never shy to go after a competitor, vendor, etc - Fastly, AWS, Hashicorp, etc. So going after ZS is to be expected.

I think finally we are getting Cloudflare (after dropping around 20% for 5 sessions) at a more reasonable price, which can be confirmed from the following report (updated June 13th)

https://www.meritechcapital.com/benchmarking/valuation-metri…

I think the growth adjusted ev ntm / revenue metric gives a good idea where Cloudflare stands.

3 Likes

Laney,

Think about that for a minute. DDOG has lost close to 50% of its stock price, while there has been no slowdown in its business.

That’s been the case for many high growth stocks over the past 7+ months, in fact, many are down well over 50%. But those reductions in stock prices were not because of their business fundamentals (as they’ve continued to be fantastic, as you’ve pointed out). The stock price reductions throughout the high growth, SaaS, IT software sectors has been because the market has decided to rerate the multiples of those stocks. Its the thing we’re not allowed to discuss here, the valuations have been reduced significantly because of the current conditions we’re in. The market is much more risk-averse right now so unwilling to pay the huge multiples on P/S ratios.

I’m not saying it’s right, or justified, but it’s obvious that is what has happened to the high growth sector we follow. When I (because of Saul and this board) first started investing in these stocks in 2016/2017, the P/S ratios were mostly under 20 with the REALLY highly valued stocks in the 20-30s. We then enjoyed 5+ years of multiple expansion into the 50-60s for the top companies, with some outliers up over 100 at times. Now, we seem to have the multiples back were they were when I started riding this train, hopefully that means not much further to fall (although I know they could drop a bunch at any time, as there doesn’t seem to be a floor that we’ve encountered yet).

Again, I’m still fully invested in these names and am hoping for an actual rebound soon, and not another head fake down to new lows, but again, I know that can and may happen.

This 7 month thrashing my portfolio has endured has taught me that I will change my investing method some going forward, but I will not sell out of the current names now, as I believe them to be grossly oversold and due for somewhat of a rebound (who knows how much). Since portfolio management is off topic, I won’t discuss what I’m going to be changing about my method, it would, after all, only be right for me, in my situation, being recently retired.

Good luck to us all.
Mike

39 Likes

NET’s CEO Matthew Prince presented at the Jeffries Software Conference. Prince’s statements during this conference were alarming to me. Prince said it will be a tough couple of years for tech and flat-out accused other businesses saying otherwise as liars. Prince talked about his company being an above 40% grower in the future. I wish he had said above 50%. Prince also talked about having an “all-hands” meeting to tell employees to focus on what NET is good at. I presume this is an effort to cut down on expenses for a lot of NET’s tools, which is sort of against the NET culture of innovate at all costs. Not sure this new version of NET culture will work. On the other hand, NET is supposedly entering some new markets, such as zero trust in competition w/ ZS. NET’s Prince has taken to the offensive by attacking ZS’s offering. This is unlike him, because he usually a “hug ops” guy that offers mutual respect to other tech companies. Does he feel backed into a corner and is he trying to claw his way out?

Hi laney,
Your description of Cloudflare’s CEO Prince’s presentation at the Jeffries Conference worried me and inspired me to listen to it (just a 26 minute presentation), and I was amazed how differently I perceived it than you did. I was prepared to sell part of my position but I ended up adding to it. Perhaps you didn’t listen to the presentation but got your info elsewhere.

“Prince said it will be a tough couple of years for tech”.

No, he said it would be a tough couple of years for the world.

“He flat-out accused other businesses saying otherwise as liars”.

Totally untrue! He said that they didn’t have the same rapid evaluation of what was going on that Cloudflare had.

“Prince talked about his company being an above 40% grower in the future”

No, he said something like that as they would grow in the 40’s for the next 5 years or so, at worst, he feels comfortable in continuing to go all out for growth, especially as Cloudflare is about breakeven in profits and FCF. Totally different from what you said.

“Prince also talked about having an “all-hands” meeting to tell employees to focus on what NET is good at. I presume this is an effort to cut down on expenses for a lot of NET’s tools, which is sort of against the NET culture of innovate at all costs. Not sure this new version of NET culture will work.”

I can’t believe you wrote this! Did you not listen at all to what he said? He said he wanted them to focus on the areas where Cloudflare was lacking, and was not a world leader, and bring those areas up to par. That’s the opposite of what you said. It means more innovation, not less, and more of Cloudflare’s culture, not less. And he already had said they were going all out, not cutting back. And he was incredibly enthusiastic about the future of the company.

At first I thought you just misunderstood, but as I wrote this I see that by changing each of the things he said just enough, you managed to misinterpret all of what he said, which was impossible to do if you had listened, so I have to wonder if this was just a sophisticated hatchet job on Cloudflare by someone who just happened to show up on the board to make his first post. By a short seller in other words. I hate to think that, as you sound like a nice guy, but I just don’t understand how you could have gotten so much of what he said so totally wrong.

Saul

203 Likes

Saul - Thanks for your comments. Your perspective is much appreciated.

4 Likes

These are excerpts from a transcript of the conference. I can’t provide a link as it’s proprietary behind a paywall, but I think these excerpts are fair use. I haven’t listened to the presentation, so if the transcript is wrong, then these quotes will be wrong.


Laney: “Prince said it will be a tough couple of years for tech”.

Saul: “No, he said it would be a tough couple of years for the world.”

Transcript: “I think that the mood, especially in Europe, right now is that the world is at war both literally, but also figuratively. And I think that we are in for a difficult next few years.”

Laney: “He flat-out accused other businesses saying otherwise as liars”.

Saul: “Totally untrue! He said that they didn’t have the same rapid evaluation of what was going on that Cloudflare had.”

Transcript: “I think what has always been a real strength of Cloudflare has been that because we see things early and our feedback cycles are so fast, we can adapt to that. But anyone who tells you – sits up here and tells you that they’re not having to adapt how they’re marketing, how they’re going to market, how they’re closing deals, how they’re getting new logos, how they’re getting new customers, doesn’t have their business instrumented as we do.”

and later in the presentation:
“It’s just – nobody is telling the truth. I mean, guys, do all know it, like the world can’t harder. Anyone who’s not telling you that is lying to you. The world has gotten harder, and it’s going to be good for us, hard in the short term. But in 24 months, we will come out with our ship being significantly more efficient with us owning a significantly larger share of the market and us being an absolute critical unreplaceable part of how every corporate network is run.” [emphasis mine]

Laney: “Prince talked about his company being an above 40% grower in the future”

Saul: “No, he said something like that as they would grow in the 40’s for the next 5 years or so, at worst, he feels comfortable in continuing to go all out for growth, especially as Cloudflare is about breakeven in profits and FCF. Totally different from what you said.”

Transcript: “We’re really well instrumented to know what the levers are to be able to control our business. But if we can continue to grow at north of 40%, then I can’t think of anywhere even in difficult times to put dollars back into – to put dollars other than back into our business. And the opportunity is so large that I think it makes a ton of sense for us to continue to do that. I mean we subscribe very much to sort of the rule 40, except right now we just don’t want to be in sort of a negative operating margin position.”

Laney: “Prince also talked about having an “all-hands” meeting to tell employees to focus on what NET is good at. I presume this is an effort to cut down on expenses for a lot of NET’s tools, which is sort of against the NET culture of innovate at all costs. Not sure this new version of NET culture will work.”

Saul: “I can’t believe you wrote this! Did you not listen at all to what he said? He said he wanted them to focus on the areas where Cloudflare was lacking, and was not a world leader, and bring those areas up to par. That’s the opposite of what you said. It means more innovation, not less, and more of Cloudflare’s culture, not less. And he already had said they were going all out, not cutting back. And he was incredibly enthusiastic about the future of the company.”

Transcript: “I’m on Thursday, going to give an all-hands meeting, where I’m going to say, guys, the world is getting really hard, and that’s going to have to force us to really think about the places in our business where we’re not world class and tighten up those places.” [emphasis mine]

I’ve tried to balance being comprehensive in selecting quotes while also being respectful of fair use. I hope this objective information on a high-growth company is helpful for the board.

best,
dan (TMF Galagan)

149 Likes

I’ve tried to balance being comprehensive in selecting quotes while also being respectful of fair use. I hope this objective information on a high-growth company is helpful for the board.

Thank you! Having the original quotes is much more valuable than someone saying “No…” without showing evidence for his interpretation.

10 Likes

I listened to it to get a feel for the difference in interpretation.

Prince said it will be a tough couple of years for tech".

No, he said it would be a tough couple of years for the world.

(I agree with Saul’s interpretation here)

“He flat-out accused other businesses saying otherwise as liars”.

Totally untrue! He said that they didn’t have the same rapid evaluation of what was going on that Cloudflare had.

Saul’s interpretation is correct and Prince used NET’s rapid sales cycle of “less that a quarter” to justify their superior knowledge through more rapid feedback.

“Prince talked about his company being an above 40% grower in the future”

No, he said something like that as they would grow in the 40’s for the next 5 years or so, at worst, he feels comfortable in continuing to go all out for growth, especially as Cloudflare is about breakeven in profits and FCF. Totally different from what you said.

10:30 mins - He actually said, in response to a question about should he drive increased profitability, [He will continue to drive to break even and invest money in the business on that basis because “IF we can continue to grow north of 40%” he can’t think of a better way to invest money.] I couldn’t find where he mentioned “next five years” but he is comfortable investing provided they don’t drop below break even.

“Prince also talked about having an “all-hands” meeting to tell employees to focus on what NET is good at. I presume this is an effort to cut down on expenses for a lot of NET’s tools, which is sort of against the NET culture of innovate at all costs. Not sure this new version of NET culture will work.”

I can’t believe you wrote this! Did you not listen at all to what he said? He said he wanted them to focus on the areas where Cloudflare was lacking, and was not a world leader, and bring those areas up to par. That’s the opposite of what you said. It means more innovation, not less, and more of Cloudflare’s culture, not less. And he already had said they were going all out, not cutting back. And he was incredibly enthusiastic about the future of the company.

(12:30 on interview)He did not mention anything about par. He said they would have to focus on areas in the company that are not world class and “tighten up” those areas. (Me - these remarks could be interpreted as investing in those areas to improve or cutting those areas, I viewed his tone as neutral and either option would not surprise me. He did say that some people would find these actions very difficult and he was talking in the context of an employee meeting “on Thursday” which would have been June 3rd(must have happened by now) so any layoffs?

I’m not buying or selling.

D

9 Likes

@laneylawyer - Thanks for initiating an interesting discussion about what the future might portend for some of our favorite companies.

Unlike some other respondents, I will not ding you or label you for your opinions. Everyone is entitled to their points of view and don’t deserve to be put down or called names. Contrary opinions should be welcomed because that’s what makes a market.

As we try to understand the future prospects for these companies, the key question we should ask ourselves is:

How can we confirm what is truly happening with these companies’ sales pipelines and how they will fare over the next 12-18 months?

Sure many of these companies have secular tailwinds that will help. But then we have higher growth standards for our holdings and just a tailwind is sometimes not enough to meet our desired thresholds.

Additionally, I prefer to look at actual performance numbers and SEC filings rather than the words of a C-suite leader. They are always in “sales” mode at public events, words carefully chosen without revealing too much. Not surprising that there are so many interpretations of the same comments even on this board.

And I don’t subscribe to the “mission critical” mantra that many supporters are espousing: https://discussion.fool.com/don39t-believe-the-quotmission-criti…

Everyone and their uncle is mission critical until sales start slowing down because their customer base decides to cut budgets. If your customers are in the retail sector, they are hurting. If they are in the auto business, they are hurting. If they are in the financial sector, they are hurting…etc etc.

Customers who are seeing their own sales get compressed for a variety of reasons are making tough budget decisions and technology projects are a big target for the CFO. For most technology projects, labor costs are a much bigger component of the total costs versus just the SaaS license costs.

So how do we proceed? Do we have any actionable data that we can rely on?

We have the following:

  1. Guidance from the Q1 earnings report
  2. Actual business performance as reported in upcoming Q2, Q3 etc quarterly reports
  3. Forward guidance provided in upcoming Q2, Q3 etc quarterly reports

I am usually skeptical about #1 and #3 above, because CEOs and CFOs become adept at playing the guidance numbers game so that they have a good shot at “beating” guidance every quarter.

As for #2, imo, RPO is the most informative forward looking sales metric that will tell us the true health of future revenue growth.
https://discussion.fool.com/making-sense-of-rpo-arr-and-deferred…
P.S. Errata in the post linked just above - RPO is almost always reported in the 10Q and 10K for companies with a SaaS business model.
Now RPO is not perfect, but it is the closest SEC reported numerical insight into future revenues and timing of when those contractual $ might be booked.

As we get into Q2 earnings and beyond, I will be looking closely at RPO growth trends for clues.

Beachman (beachman.substack.com)

20 Likes

Laney: “Prince talked about his company being an above 40% grower in the future”

Saul: “No, he said something like that as they would grow in the 40’s for the next 5 years or so, at worst, he feels comfortable in continuing to go all out for growth, especially as Cloudflare is about breakeven in profits and FCF. Totally different from what you said.”

Transcript: "We’re really well instrumented to know what the levers are to be able to control our business. But if we can continue to grow at north of 40%…

I would say Lane and Saul both got the above wrong in their interpretation.

‘If we can’ is nothing like saying they would/will grow at 40%+.

It’s what they will do with the dollars IF they are able to do it.

No position, having sold out of NET,
Naj

18 Likes

I suggest that everybody read the transcript and make your own interpretation of the meaning of what was said. Personally I am not invested in Net because they said they were going to be all about growing and not looking to be profitable. At least that was my interpretation. So please don’t call me a liar.

Andy

7 Likes

Mathew Prince, CEO of Cloudflare said this, “ And one of the core values at Cloudflare – the three core values of Cloudflare, transparency, curiosity and being principled, right. And we really believe in those things. But transparency, which internally, like I am on Thursday, going to give an all hands meeting where I’m going to say, guys, the world is getting really hard and that’s going to have to force us to really think about the places in our business where we are not world class and tighten up those places.

My take on this is that Prince is acknowledging that there are some places where Cloudflare is being out-competed, presumably because of product quality. Whether this is the product itself, what it costs, or how it is being supported or ?? is unclear. But Prince seems be taking a pretty clear-eyed look at things AND communicating them transparently, which is part of why I think he is an exceptional leader.

Cloudflare is already an outsized part of my holdings and I am adding to it at current levels.

Regards,

Dorset

11 Likes

I agree with Andy, read it or watch it for yourself. Here’s a link!

https://wsw.com/webcast/jeff241/net/1698366

or

https://cloudflare.net/events-and-presentations/events-calen…

But in short I agree with Saul, He said it’s going to be a couple of tough years (sounds like he’s more bearish or honest than most) but he would rather be in NET than any other company. (He was talking macro environment.) This will be a time of consolidation where the weak will not survive and NET will come out stronger with more market share in the end. He knows what levers to pull to make sure they have enough cash to run the business but still wants to invest heavily due to the massive opportunity in front of them! He is very confident and errors on the side of caution and is very optimistic about the future. He sounds like a very confident and honest leader! He also down played the thought of becoming the 4th cloud and see’s NET as the fabric of the internet and pretty much every company in the future will use NET at least a little bit.

Good luck to all!

Chris

50 Likes

Hey Guys, this is only a 26 minute video, and if you really want to understand what he said, watch the video (as I made clear that I did).
Saul

18 Likes

PS - The video of the presentation at the Jeffries conference is on Cloudflare’s Investor Relations website.

3 Likes

Chris (cwg75), thanks for that excellent summary. You really put it all together in one paragraph and gave a true feeling for what he was saying. I appreciate it, and I recommend it to others (post #85224).
Saul

12 Likes

As a first-time poster, I did not nail the planned soft landing (pun intended). I want to thank everyone for the encouraging messages I received. My hope is to become a meaningful contributor to this community, especially for all the great things it has done for me and my family. So I did want to circle back to clear the air a little.

First, some housekeeping. Thank you for your comment, Saul. I appreciate the feedback, even when it is negative. That’s the only way to get better. Investing is tough and the “information age” (or should I say “misinformation age”) has made it ten times tougher. I want to be part of the solution, not the problem. Also, I wanted to apologize to the Board for: (1) not including actual quotes from NET’s Prince before giving my opinions on them, which would have made for a more complete post, and (2) not explicitly disclosing that I was long all the stocks I discussed (including NET).

Now, onto some more analysis on my statements about NET to make sure this post stays on topic. It is important to remember the purpose of my post: “This post is about what companies I see doing best in the second half of this year ” and “to see how they [our companies] are going to do in this environment going forward.” To that end, I tried to put the companies in order of what I think will be the strongest rebound in the near-term macro environment to the least strongest rebound, being: (1) DDOG (strongest rebound), (2) CRWD, (3) ZS, (4) SNOW, and (5) NET (least strongest rebound).

I have now re-watched Prince’s interview and digested all of the comments about it. I still would not change the order of my list. As stated in my original post, you have three companies that have indicated in one way or another that it is business as usual despite the macro conditions (DDOG, CRWD, and ZS). You have one company that re-iterated the mid-point of its targets (SNOW), which is similar to confirming it is business as usual despite macro conditions. Then, you have what NET’s Prince said during that interview. We’ve already established everyone should watch the video themselves to reach their own conclusions about what message Prince was trying to convey. So I’ll try not to re-hash the meaning of individual statements. But, based on all the useful comments, I think at the very least there are multiple reasonable interpretations of what Prince was saying, including my original opinion. Now, in my humble opinion of course, you have four companies that successfully conveyed the message to investors that macro issues have not been a big factor (i.e., had a specific intent to get that message out), and you have one company that failed to clearly deliver that message (i.e., did not have a specific intent to get that message out or missed an opportunity to get that message out). To me (aka – in my humble opinion), this is enough to order the list as I originally stated.

In my original post, I also stated SNOW edged out ahead of NET because it “has a higher growth rate and has free cash flow.” I want to dig into this a little more. In late October/early November 2021, NET’s stock price was around $200 compared to today’s $41. There was a very useful discussion on this Board started by Saul. Saul was wondering why the stock price of NET had gone so high, when it did not have as favorable growth and financial metrics as the other four companies I mentioned in my original post. The post w/ its comments may be found here:

https://discussion.fool.com/what-am-i-missing-with-cloudflare-34…

This great community banded together to provide 23 comments explaining different reasons why NET was doing so great, and Saul provided a great post summarizing the different reasons from the community here:

https://discussion.fool.com/cloudflare-here39s-what-we-were-miss…

To me (again, just my humble opinion), the primary reason that made NET so great last year–new product offerings and partnerships–is no longer being rewarded in this macro environment. The market has been indiscriminate in not rewarding companies for new products, including SNOW, DDOG, and SentinelOne. By way of specific example for NET, on May 11, 2022, NET announced “D1: The First Integrated Database for Workers Serverless Platform,” which sounded important. The past few days NET has announced more new products, which seem to be important (See, e.g., https://twitter.com/eastdakota/status/1538570511482949633), but the market has not reacted significantly to these announcements in the pre-market trading as I write this.

Based on this new environment that is more focused on numbers than new products and partnerships, I would keep my rankings the same as my original post.

After reviewing our analysis of NET last year, there are also a few things I don’t understand the tech enough to draw a finite conclusion but which makes the picture a little murkier for me. We were really excited about NET’s new products last year. It’s been a few quarters since then, but NET’s numbers have stayed mostly consistent (growth around 51 – 53% y/o/y). Do these products need more time to develop? Or were they needed to maintain the status quo? This has me wondering what fruit the current crop of NET product announcements will bear. I’m also confused about whether NET wants to be the “fourth major public cloud,” which was what Prince announced last October: “I think that we really think we’re on the path to be the fourth major public cloud. And, I think that our approach to it is actually much more differentiated than the other three, and so yeah, we will continue to build things out.” See https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/28/cloudflare-enters-infrastr…. We were all very excited about this at the time. However, at the recent Jefferies conference interview, the following exchange occurred:

Question: Everyone says you’re the fourth cloud, meaning Amazon, Azure, Google, is that an aspiration do you want to be there? Or is it…

Answer from Prince: No, I think, we – what we want to be is the fabric that connects everything including the clouds together … [Prince explained further what this means].

I don’t know enough about the tech to have an opinion on whether being the fabric is better, worse, or indifferent. Just wanted to note that it is something that confuses me. Since SNOW has a little clearer picture to me, I would also let this inch SNOW ahead of NET in my rankings (but not by much).

To be clear, I think NET is a solid company and will do well in the long run. (I’m actually a fan of Prince. I follow him on Twitter, and he is a great follow (@eastdakota is his handle)). I also own NET stock in my account and my kids’ account (I’m willing to experiment on myself but I’m not going to let my kids own junk!).

Of course, I could be completely wrong, and NET could bury our other favorites in the dust as they all climb back to their ATHs (something I’m confident will happen for all of them). Here are some things I will be watching for from NET:

  1. Does NET start to steal significant zero trust security market share from ZS? You should note that ZS’s comments cited in my original post were about a month before everyone else’s and a lot happened in that month of May. ZS is live streaming an investor conference this Thursday at 1:30 (cst), where I hope it addresses macro issues and its competition with NET.
  2. Prince is always talking about how they know how to operate NET’s “levers.” Is Prince able to pull some levers to give the market the numbers it wants this year?
  3. Do NET’s new product offerings accelerate its growth rate or profitability?
  4. Does the macro picture change to a similar environment we were in last year and start rewarding innovation more again?

Anyways, I hope this clarifies some of my thinking. Thanks for reading and letting me be a part of the Board.

Hang in there everybody.

Best,

BTL
@Laneylawyer

Long DDOG, CRWD, ZS, SNOW, and NET

No financial advice in this post – Everybody must do their own due diligence.

66 Likes

Hi Laneylawyer,
Thanks for the calm reply after I and others disagreed with you last post on this thread. I appreciate the views of others and value the opportunity to discuss these differences.

When you said, “ To me (again, just my humble opinion), the primary reason that made NET so great last year–new product offerings and partnerships–is no longer being rewarded in this macro environment. The market has been indiscriminate in not rewarding companies for new products, including SNOW, DDOG, and SentinelOne.”.

It helped me think of:

Many people who are considered to be the best here often write about what Mr. Market ‘appears to be valuing now’ compared to other times and making decisions based on this (eg: Price/Sales or Growth at all cost vs discounted Free Cash a flow, etc) I’ve tried to extrapolate the past into the future regarding market sentiment myself.

I’ll admit now, I have a difficult enough time trying to maintain my own standard for how I personally value a company into which I invest. I’m no longer going to try, based on what appears to effect market sentiment presently, as it shows up in share price, and using this to try and guess what characteristics of a company will effect future market sentiment. I believe this is only accurate when looking backward and is inherently a trap I need to avoid. I see this a kin to trying to understand what specific customer issues will effect future purchases from one of our companies by looking closely at QoQ revenue growth rates, specifically when trying to do this for a company that has a usage based business model. Saul has written out some amazing standards for how to value a Hypergrowth company. I’ve added many for my self, from what I’ve learned from others here (see my July 2020 portfolio summary here: ). I’ll stick with this for now.

Best,

Jason

7 Likes

Good afternoon, everyone –

I thought it would be helpful to perform a checkup on my original post above and also provide some additional analysis on recent earnings. My original post was made on June 15, 2022, when market sentiment was arguably at its lowest. Since the inflation reading on Tuesday, sentiment is still pretty low. Let’s take a minute to ignore all the financial media fear mongering and see what’s really been going on in our world.

I. Introduction

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.”

? Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities

These famous lines were used by Mr. Dickens to summarize the radical differences in London and Paris during the French revolution. If Mr. Dickens was still alive and a wise growth investor, I like to think he might post these words on Saul’s Investing Discussions to describe the current environment. It is the best of times for our companies, who continue to church out fantastic results. But it sure feels like the worst of times in the macro world around us. Remember, if our companies are doing this well in the current environment, how do you think they will do as things improve? I continue to accumulate shares in all the companies discussed in this post, because I believe they will return to ATHs and that it might just happen as quickly as they dropped.

Now, onto the on-topic stuff. My original post on June 15 was to determine “what companies I see doing best in the second half of this year” and “to see how they [our companies] are going to do in this environment going forward.” My list of companies best positioned for a rebound starting with my favorite was: (1) DDOG (strongest rebound), (2) CRWD, (3) ZS, (4) SNOW, and (5) NET (least strongest rebound).

Well, how have I done so far? Not so good. Below is a summary of where we are since my original post:

DDOG 87 (June 14) → 98 (present day). Rebound = 13%
CRWD 183 (June 14) → 183 (present day). Rebound = 0%
ZS 142 (June 14)–> 181 (present day). Rebound = 27%
SNOW 113 (June 14)–> 191 (present day). Rebound = 69%
NET 41 (June 14) → 59 (present day). Rebound = 43%

While I got the order of the companies wrong (so far), I still would not change my overall opinion that these five companies are the best suited for a large rebound. Let’s look under their hoods to see how they have been doing, despite the macro craziness around them.

II. EARNINGS RECAPS

A. DDOG

On August 4, 2021, DDOG reported earnings for its Q2. During the prepared remarks, DDOG’s CEO “recognize[d] the macro environment is uncertain as we look into the back half of 2022. But we also see no change to the long-term trends towards cloud-based services and modern DevOps environments , and Observability remains critical to that journey.” The CEO explained DDOG’s products drive “value, efficiency and cost savings to solve [customers’] complex monitoring problems.” Because of this, the CEO summed up the future of DDOG as follows: “As a result, we continue to feel very confident in our opportunities. We believe cloud migration and digital transformation are drivers of our long-term growth and our multiyear trends that are still early in their life cycle. And we believe it is increasingly critical for companies to embark on these journeys in order to move faster, serve their customers better and in times like these become more efficient with their infrastructure and engineering investments. So we plan to continue to invest in our solid priorities to execute on these long-term opportunities.”

DDOG’s CFO’s prepared remarks were not quit as strong. He admitted “[W]e did see some customers beginning to manage costs in response to macroeconomic concerns, which impacted our usage growth with some of our existing customers.” The decrease was concentrated in large spend customers. Importantly, the declaration appeared to be limited to one small segment of DDOG’s business: “Amongst our industries, we saw relative deceleration in consumer discretionary customers, which represents low teens percent of our ARR.” The CFO made a point to follow up this comment with “we are highly diversified in industries and segments. And we saw lower expansion rate weighted towards areas of our platform that have volume-based components like certain aspects of log management and APM. Infrastructure monitoring ARR growth was relatively steady year-over-year.” The CFO confirmed gross retention remained steady and that DDOG “saw strong continued new logo acquisition and ARR growth, broadly by geography and across industries and company sizes.”

What people did not like at first was the CFO’s guidance (This is why you never stand next to a CFO at a party). There was a small 1% raise in guidance, as opposed to DDOG’s usual cadence. However, the CFO did say this guidance was based on “conservative assumptions as to the organic growth of customers” and took “into account the macroeconomic uncertainty and recent variability of the growth among certain customers.” The CFO concluded by recognizing there is “greater uncertainty in the macro environment,” but that “we see no change in the importance of cloud migration and digital transformation, which are critical to our customers’ competitive advantage.”

During the analyst Q/A, the CFO confirmed that DDOG’s guidance was “lower, more conservative than we have done in previous quarters. And the reason for that is the macro uncertainty where we can’t be as confident about what happens given the macro uncertainty.”

During the analyst Q/A, the CEO talked about how DDOG will have certain advantages during a potential downturn: “[T]here’s no doubt in our minds about the long-term profitability profile of the company. So what this does is that it affords us opportunities to invest in times like this, that the rest of the market will not have.” The CEO talked about using their cash in a downturn to continue to hire aggressively and innovate.

The market reaction to DDOG was interesting. Once the numbers came out, it immediately dropped about ten percent in pre-market. It then walked back to about break-even during the conference call. I think a lot of people were scared of initial guidance because they thought something was wrong with the business, but then they jumped back in as soon as they learned the guidance was just the CFO being unusually “cautious” based on macro uncertainty.

I still think DDOG is about as good as it gets for a growth investment. I think of it as a “pillar” of any growth portfolio. And I think the low guidance sets it up for larger beats in the coming quarters. It is comforting to know that I am not alone. Beth Kindig had a nice twitter post, which highlighted DDOG as one of the top tech stocks purchased by institutions last month:

https://twitter.com/Beth_Kindig/status/1567924954959695872?s…

I’m still hoping this is a spring being loaded and will bounce back ahead of the pack by year end. One important thing to remember is that SNOW and NET had such big bounces after earnings because people were expecting them to get hit hard by Macro (discussed more below). That shoe might have now flipped, putting DDOG into the driver’s seat of who the masses might think will have a slow down based on DDOG’s conservative guide.

B. CRWD

On August 30, 2022, CRWD reported its Q2. During the prepared remarks, CRWD’s CEO was confident in CRWD’s abilities: “[W]e believe we have the ability to continue to grow at scale, generate cash and invest in initiatives that will further widen the gap between CrowdStrike and the competition, especially at a time when companies are forced to reduce their spending and hiring plans. ” Kurtz went on to confirm the cybersecurity market is doing fine: “The demand environment we see is more robust today than this time last year as cybersecurity is not discretionary … We continue to see powerful tailwinds fueling our market, and we do not currently see any indication that these trends will abate anytime soon. ” Kurtz further stated “cybersecurity is an essential technology” and is a “growing priority” among company directors.

CRWD’s CFO described the company as investing “aggressively in our business” and “add[ing] a record number of net new hires during the quarter.” The CFO described the customer base, sales motion, gross retention rate, and SAAS model as factors that “will provide resiliency in any type of environment as we build a durable cash generator for today and years to come.” He also raised guidance: “We continue to remain optimistic about the demand for our offerings, record pipeline and our ability to execute on the powerful secular trends fueling our markets, and as a result, we are raising our guidance for fiscal 2023.”

During the Q/A, an analyst asked what happens to CRWD if Macro gets worse. Kurtz responded that “security is not going away.” He also said they would look at “M&A opportunities,” “contin[ue] to hit the gas,” innovate, and continue to get “stronger and stronger.” He concluded with: “if it gets worse, we think we’re in a great position, enterprise software, SaaS, security, long-term contracts, great cash flow.” The CFO followed up by referring to security as “recession-resilient.” He also said CRWD’s balance sheet puts them in a great position for a downturn and will let them hire some great people during a downturn.

CRWD is not a company that usually has big bounces after earnings, even before all this macro stuff. It usually has a dependable and steady march up between reports. I think that steady march will continue. When CRWD’s steady gains over the years are coupled with its “recession-resilient” product, this company also forms a solid pillar of any growth portfolio. Investment bank UBS named CRWD No. 1 on its disruptor stock list, describing “Strong secular tailwinds from growing cloud computing market will help to bolster its topline growth."

C. SNOW

On August 24, 2022, SNOW released its Q2 2023 earnings. In the CFO’s prepared remarks, the CFO explained: “We are monitoring our key business metrics, which we believe are leading indicators of the macro economy impacting our business. We are not seeing these metrics soften across the customer base. For example, our corporate sales team that addresses small and medium-sized businesses outperformed their net new bookings goal for the quarter. Our EMEA sales team contributed 4 of our top 10 new customer wins in the quarter. And as mentioned earlier, the largest organizations in the world continue to increase their use of Snowflake. These indicate that companies globally are prioritizing Snowflake right now.” The CFO also explained they are continuing to hire like mad, adding almost 1,000 net new employees this year. He closed with: “Our long-term opportunity is stronger than it has ever been and we look forward to executing.”

During the analyst Q/A, management was asked if SNOW is “insulated” for an economic slowdown. The CEO said “I would say that Snowflake gets prioritized fairly high inside the enterprise. And the reason is we are sitting right on the intersection of cloud computing, artificial intelligence, machine learning, advanced analytics.” He went on to explain: “this is why we feel that this is not one of those expenses that people are going to casually cutback on, because it’s strategically compelling and important.” The CFO followed up by stating “by and large, most of our customers are still ramping, moving workloads to us. And we think that is going to continue on average with our customers.” The CFO also referred to SNOW’s guidance as “prudent” based on Macro factors.

Later on, in response to another question about macro, the CEO explained that companies cannot resist going to the cloud: “You can’t take advantage of innovations that are only available on the cloud [if you stay on premise]. So if anything, I can to agree with you that we’re going to see acceleration out of this as opposed to people holding back.” Slootman went on to repeat his theory of acceleration in response to another question: “Just a quick follow-up, I actually think the dynamic that you are describing. I mean we are going to see the exact opposite of that. We think people because of the nervousness that they may have about the macro, they are going to accelerate to a cloud computing platform.

Wow! SNOW is anticipating accelerating in the current environment, even if it gets worse. What did I learn? Don’t trust analyst downgrades based on “field checks,” such as those that were handed out before SNOW’s earnings (for those that sign up for Bert’s Ticker Target service, he had a great explanation for why those “field checks” were unreliable which helped me to ignore them … if you haven’t signed up with him yet, you are missing out!). Since earnings, analysts have been quick to show SNOW the love. A Morgan Stanley analyst was amazed at SNOW’s performance in the current environment: "Sustained 80%+ product revenue growth in a quarter when the broader demand environment for software softened likely boosts investor confidence that Snowflake’s cloud data platform is viewed as a strategic (and durable) area of investment by enterprise customers.” Just last night, Goldman Sachs rated SNOW a buy with a $220 price target based on its post-earnings conversations with the CEO:

https://twitter.com/BigBullCap/status/1570002942664781825?s=…

If you need to hear this, here you go: SNOW is not too expensive! I continue to accumulate when I can.

D. NET

On August 4, 2022, NET reported Q2 earnings. Prince was very charismatic in his prepared remarks. He joked about how stern his comments were on the last earnings call: “It didn’t make me particularly popular around the CEO club, where the first rule of recession is not to talk about recession.” (I also thinks this applies to his comments at that Jefferies conference last June). But he followed up that he prides himself on being transparent. He explained that things are getting better: “In Q1, our pipeline generation slowed, sales cycles extended, and customers took longer to pay their bills. We watched those metrics closely throughout Q2 and saw them all at least stabilized. They’re not where we throw up hooray yet, but the metrics are trending in the right direction.” He talked about NET shifting its message to saving customers’ money and consolidating their spend. He called their ability to achieve these things for their customers a “superpower.” He admitted it is harder to get new customers but easier to talk to existing customers about doing more: “I believe it’s fair to say that it’s harder today than it was a year ago to sign up a new customer, but it’s gotten easier to talk to our broad set of existing customers about doing more with us.” Prince said that “[w]hile our business remains strong, I believe this is a time for prudence and caution.” Prince gave a long metaphor about how last year the road was wide open so it was time to open up the throttle, where now the road is not quite as open so time to keep your eyes on the road and let up a bit on the accelerator. Recession or not, Prince confirmed nobody is going to abandon the internet, go back to on premise, or stop getting hacked. “We are not recession-proof, but I wouldn’t trade places with any other CEO right now.”

In the analyst Q/A, there was a particular question and answer exchange that I think is worthy of a full repeat here:

Brent Thill [Jefferies Analyst]
Question: “I appreciate that. You’ve had the crystal ball and everyone appreciates your candor, and I think you were the first one to come out and say, hey, things are feeling a little different than they felt. I was just trying to understand, when you look at the perspective of what’s happening now, you mentioned things have stabilized. I mean, I just want to make sure we understand from your perspective, it hasn’t gotten worse. It’s come in that your – the stabilization trend that you’re seeing, have you seen that extend into July and the rest of the summer. What’s your sense of kind of the trajectory from where things came in, where are you at now?”

Matthew Prince [CEO of NET]
Answer: “Yes, you got me in trouble with a lot of my peers at your conference, where I said that the economy was not as rosy as people think, and I think you’ve heard a lot of those folks echo those comments now in Q2.
Let me be clear. I think that the economy is still in really rough shape. And I don’t know – and again, I’m not a member of the – I’m not an economist. But from what we hear from customers, customers are really still suffering, And the economy, I wouldn’t say that the economy itself has stabilized. What I would say is we have had the flexibility in our business to be able to adapt to a very difficult environment. That environment continues to be difficult, and I think it will be difficult at least through the rest of the year. But being able to deliver products that deliver real value, have an incredible ROI, can save customers’ money and are must haves, not nice to haves, puts us in an incredibly powerful position. And as I said in the prepared remarks, I would not trade places with any other CEO.”

This Q/A is comforting to me, because (although I was wrong) it makes me feel like I was not alone in my jitters about Prince’s Jefferies Conference remarks. I want to give a great big chunk of credit to those Board Members (including Saul), who saw through the Jefferies remarks to see a business nowhere close to slowing down.

Lessons Learned? I am hesitant to give as much credence to statements during these investment/software conferences. I think earnings remarks are carefully rehearsed so they pack a whole lot of meaning, while these conferences are more casual in nature.

Well, “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” I’m not reading any of Prince’s earning statements as negative. I think he just likes to keep expectations in check b/c he knows that’s the best way to keep his company marching upward. I’m happy with my NET shares and continue to accumulate when I can.

E. ZS

On September 8, 2022, ZS reported for its Q4 2022. During the prepared remarks, ZS’s CEO confirmed he was not scared of Macro. He explained “my conversations with hundreds of IT executives confirm that cybersecurity remains the number one IT priority and a top Board level issue.” He used my favorite word “accelerate” – “We believe periods of macro uncertainty can accelerate adoption of disruptive technologies like ours, which offer better security and user experience while substantially reducing cost and IT complexity.” He also closed his remarks by again stating they are not afraid of macro: “In closing, even with uncertain macro conditions, we continue to see favorable demand for our Zero Trust Exchange platform, which makes businesses more agile and competitive, simplifies IT, consolidates point products and reduces cost.” Just like every other company, the CFO chimed in that their guidance was “prudent” based on the “uncertain economic outlook.” In response to an analyst question, he did admit to seeing “higher deal scrutiny in Q4,” but confirmed that was already “played into guidance.” To address macro issues, ZS’s CEO described focusing on helping customers save money by getting rid of their legacy debt products and also focusing on adding value to businesses.

Similar to SNOW and NET, a lot of investors thought ZS would see a big slowdown due to macro. I think this quarter put a lot of that to bed. ZS’s high RPO growth (68%), steady increase of government customer adds (25 new federal customers in just that quarter), and prudent guidance all set this company up for a solid rebound from here.

III. CONCLUSION

This is arguably one of the worst macro environments in the last several decades. But our companies are still doing awesome! They are not afraid of macro issues so you shouldn’t be either. I am confident these companies will have an even larger rebound from here, and I plan to be fully invested in them when they do.

Take care of your mental health and hang in there, everybody. Things will turn around. They always do.

Best,

BTL
@Laneylawyer on Twitter
(Feel free to follow me for daily financial musings)

Long DDOG, CRWD, SNOW, NET, and ZS

No financial advice in this post – Everybody must do their own due diligence.

83 Likes