# Moderna mRNA vaccine reduces return of melanoma by 44%

**URL:** <https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359>\
**Category:** Macro Economic Trends and Risks\
**Created:** [December 13, 2022, 7:06pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359 "2022-12-13T19:06:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OrmontUS](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/ormontus/32/3681_2.png) [@OrmontUS](https://discussion.fool.com/u/OrmontUS)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2022, 7:06pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/1 "2022-12-13T19:06:17Z")

</div>

> **[Experimental mRNA cancer vaccine with immunotherapy reduces risk of melanoma...](https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/13/health/mrna-cancer-vaccine-study/index.html)**
>
> An experimental personalized mRNA vaccine in combination with the immunotherapy Keytruda reduced the risk of recurrence or death from melanoma in patients who had already had surgery, Moderna and Merck said Tuesday.

The randomized trial included 157 patients with stage 3 or stage 4 melanoma who had already had surgery. Some patients received nine doses of the experimental cancer vaccine made by Moderna and the immunotherapy made by Merck every three weeks for about a year, and some received only the immunotherapy. Treatment with the experimental vaccine in combination with the immunotherapy reduced the risk of cancer recurrence or death by 44% compared with the immunotherapy alone, the companies said.

Jeff  
(Disclosure: Looked up why my portfolio was out-performing today 🙂 )

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steve203](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/steve203/32/3302_2.png) [@steve203](https://discussion.fool.com/u/steve203)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2022, 8:02pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/2 "2022-12-13T20:02:48Z")

</div>

> [@OrmontUS](#):
>
> recurrence or death from melanoma

Dyslexia is fun department: first time through, I read that as “recurrence of death”, and went “what?”

I wouldn’t bet the farm on a “study” of only 157 people. That being said, I saw an interview, a couple years ago, of the two people behind BioNTech, talking about using their mRNA technology to target specific cancers. BNTX is up 7% today.

Steve

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![physician](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/physician/32/63838_2.png) [@physician](https://discussion.fool.com/u/physician)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2022, 9:27pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/3 "2022-12-13T21:27:20Z")

</div>

I just hope there isn’t any incidence of sudden cardiac arrest/death syndrome like we are seeing right now around the world…doc

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrBob2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/drbob2/32/3456_2.png) [@DrBob2](https://discussion.fool.com/u/DrBob2)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2022, 1:44am UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/4 "2022-12-14T01:44:09Z")

</div>

> [@OrmontUS](#):
>
> Looked up why my portfolio was out-performing today

MRNA was up 20% today. A poster child for the opportunity cost of selling covered calls.

DB2

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leap1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/leap1/32/72176_2.png) [@Leap1](https://discussion.fool.com/u/Leap1)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2022, 2:29am UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/5 "2022-12-14T02:29:48Z")

</div>

Jeff,

I am indebted. I sent this to one of my sisters who has a first sign of melanoma about three years ago.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VeeEnn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/veeenn/32/3379_2.png) [@VeeEnn](https://discussion.fool.com/u/VeeEnn)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2022, 9:45am UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/6 "2022-12-14T09:45:22Z")

</div>

> [@physician](#):
>
> I just hope there isn’t any incidence of sudden cardiac arrest/death syndrome like we are seeing right now around the world…doc

You mean like the incidence of side effects with the smallpox (cow pox) vaccine?😅🤣😂 … 🤔

[The cow-pock,-or-The wonderful effects of the new inoculation! | The Morgan Library & Museum](https://www.themorgan.org/blog/cow-pock-or-wonderful-effects-new-inoculation)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VeeEnn](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/veeenn/32/3379_2.png) [@VeeEnn](https://discussion.fool.com/u/VeeEnn)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2022, 9:53am UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/7 "2022-12-14T09:53:32Z")

</div>

> [@steve203](#):
>
> I wouldn’t bet the farm on a “study” of only 157 people.
> 
> Steve

Small numbers and early days for sure…but not in and of itself unduly suspicious. What does wave an honkin’ big Flamme Rouge, however, is the statement to the effect that these are the results of a phase 2b study that come from a press release _ **that hasn’t yet been peer reviewed or even published** _. How much more unethical can you get?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steve203](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/steve203/32/3302_2.png) [@steve203](https://discussion.fool.com/u/steve203)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2022, 7:15pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/moderna-mrna-vaccine-reduces-return-of-melanoma-by-44/84359/8 "2022-12-14T19:15:16Z")

</div>

> [@VeeEnn](#):
>
> phase 2b study that come from a press release _ **that hasn’t yet been peer reviewed or even published** _. How much more unethical can you get?

That is how Moderna rolls. Remember the release of preliminary findings of a trial of Moderna’s covid vax, just in time to goose the stock, for the company’s benefit?

_When the biotech company Moderna announced early on Monday morning positive results from a small, preliminary trial of its [coronavirus vaccine], the company’s chief medical officer described the news as a “triumphant day for us.”_

_Moderna’s stock price jumped as much as 30 percent._

_Nine hours after its initial news release — and after the markets closed — the company announced a stock offering with the aim of raising more than $1 billion to help bankroll vaccine development. That offering had not been mentioned in Moderna’s briefings of investors and journalists that morning, and the company chairman later said it was decided on only that afternoon._

> **[How Upbeat Vaccine News Fueled a Stock Surge, and an Uproar (Published 2020)](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/23/health/coronavirus-vaccine-moderna.html)**
>
> The desperate hunt for treatments and vaccines has changed how researchers, regulators, drug companies like Moderna, investors and journalists do their jobs.
