National Statistics are in crisis

Statistics are the infrastructure of Macroeconomics. The Federal Reserve relies on honest statistics. Investors rely on statistics.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00699-2

National statistics are in crisis around the world — and the impacts will be severe

Some researchers are sounding the alarm over the official data sets that track crucial aspects of life in the United States, Argentina, the United Kingdom and India.

By


Official statistics are data collected and validated by both national statistical agencies and international organizations. Nearly every country has an agency for official statistics. They collect information and organize it into statistics about myriad aspects of life, including what people earn, how many individuals are employed, how well children perform in school, the quality of nutrition, how long patients have to wait for an operation, levels of air pollution and increases to average temperatures…

People who work with or study official statistics say that they have never experienced a period similar to today’s situation. Those who call the current state a crisis think it has been triggered by an accumulation of overlapping factors. These include falling response rates to national surveys, cuts to funding and, in some cases, government interference…

Rules established by an assembly of the world’s national statisticians and endorsed by the UN require that some data sets meet international standards, which state that official statistics should be accurate, impartial, trustworthy and grounded in evidence…

Illustration: Jasiek Krzysztofiak/Nature. Adapted from photograph by Rob Curran

“Uncertainty.”

“Loss of trust.”

“Definitely a crisis.”

These are some of the ways in which researchers describe the state of affairs for government data in many countries.


Do you really know the way the world is heading? Take this quiz on plans to save humanity.

“There is a new type of politics that is undermining the credibility of official statistics,” says João Pedro Azevedo, chief statistician for the United Nations children’s agency UNICEF in New York City.

Official statistics are data collected and validated by both national statistical agencies and international organizations. Nearly every country has an agency for official statistics. They collect information and organize it into statistics about myriad aspects of life, including what people earn, how many individuals are employed, how well children perform in school, the quality of nutrition, how long patients have to wait for an operation, levels of air pollution and increases to average temperatures.

National agencies collect data through surveys and from secondary sources. These data sets are used by governments to inform policy, by businesses to plan for the future, and by researchers and advocacy organizations. Official statistics, such as those measuring nations’ gross domestic product (GDP), are also the foundation for monitoring progress towards the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals, the world’s plan to end poverty and achieve environmental sustainability.

“Official statistics are like the backbone of a nation’s data infrastructure,” says Steve Pierson, director of science policy at the American Statistical Association (ASA) in Washington DC. “Just like any other infrastructure — roads, bridges and highways — they cannot fail.”

People who work with or study official statistics say that they have never experienced a period similar to today’s situation. Those who call the current state a crisis think it has been triggered by an accumulation of overlapping factors. These include falling response rates to national surveys, cuts to funding and, in some cases, government interference.

Although funded by governments, national statistics offices are expected to operate independently of politicians, not least so that they are free to report the data as measured — much as academic research operates at arm’s length from its public-funding bodies. Moreover, rules established by an assembly of the world’s national statisticians and endorsed by the UN require that some data sets meet international standards, which state that official statistics should be accurate, impartial, trustworthy and grounded in evidence.

Although there is a history of inappropriate government involvement in the collection and reporting of national statistics (A. V. Georgiou Stat. J. IAOS 37, 85–105; 2021), there is a record of statistics agencies calling out the misuse of such data, too. But researchers worry that this might not be the case in future. “I fear that it is becoming harder for official statisticians to do their jobs,” says Diane Coyle, research director at the Bennett School of Public Policy at the University of Cambridge, UK.

Nature explores problems with official statistics in four countries that are causing concern for researchers and statisticians.

United States: make statistics great again

The US national system is approaching a “crisis point” because of political interference and funding cuts that are threatening long-established data sets. That’s according to a report published last December by the ASA, the professional body for US statisticians (C. M. Bowen et al. The Nation’s Data at Risk: 2025 Report; ASA, 2025)…

The ASA reports that the magnitude of these problems has increased since US President Donald Trump regained office in January 2025. Events came to a head last August when Trump abruptly fired Erika McEntarfer, then the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics (BLS) in Washington DC, after the agency published US employment data showing that the unemployment rate had increased to 4.2% in July, compared with the previous month’s rate of 4.1%…

Specialists point to other threats to the country’s official statistics, too, such as the termination of several long-established data sets. Last September, for example, the US Department of Agriculture ended its 30-year-long survey of household food insecurity, calling it “redundant, costly, politicized”. However, researchers say that the data set provides crucial information about the more than 40 million people in the United States who are unable to feed themselves without assistance…

Argentina… India… [end quote]

Political interference with statistics will throw uncertainty into every market move. For example, non-farm payroll employment has completely stalled since January 2025. Total nonfarm payroll employment edged down by 92,000 in February, and the unemployment rate changed little at 4.4 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported for February 2026. But can those numbers be trusted?

Wendy

10 Likes

But lack of facts make alternative facts so much easier for the Ministry of Information to sell whatever Big Brother says to.

5 Likes

We are literally living “1984”. This recent thing about the Iran war being “47 years old” is literally “we have always been at war with Eastasia”.

8 Likes

Search:

Embassy staff held hostage
Helicopter rescue failed
Ross Perot takes a stab at it

Google AI:

In early 1979, during the chaotic onset of the Iranian Revolution, Texas billionaire and Electronic Data Systems (EDS) founder Ross Perot successfully launched a private commando raid to rescue two of his employees, Paul Chiapparone and Bill Gaylord. The employees were held in Tehran’s Qasr Prison on exorbitant bail following a contract dispute with the government.

The Rescue Operation (February 1979)

  • The Team: Perot hired retired U.S. Army Special Forces Colonel Arthur “Bull” Simons, a veteran who led the 1970 Son Tay raid in Vietnam, to lead a team of 15 former military specialists, including several EDS employees.
  • The Strategy: Initially planning a commando raid, the team pivoted when the prisoners were moved to the more secure Qasr Prison. Instead, they leveraged the local chaos, recruiting Iranian dissidents to storm the prison, which freed the EDS employees along with thousands of others.
  • The Escape: After fleeing the prison, the team and employees navigated a harrowing, two-day, 500-mile journey by road to the Turkish border, using forged documents to pass checkpoints.
  • Outcome: The mission was a success, with all members returning safely to the United States. The saga was detailed in Ken Follett’s book, On Wings of Eagles

Contrasting Events

  • Embassy Hostages: The two EDS employees rescued by Perot were not among the 52 U.S. Embassy staff held hostage later, from November 1979 to January 1981.
  • Failed Helicopter Rescue: The “failed helicopter rescue” refers to Operation Eagle Claw (April 1980), a U.S. military operation to free the embassy hostages that failed due to a sandstorm and helicopter accident in the Iranian desert.
  • Perot’s Influence: While Perot’s private mission succeeded, the US government’s official attempts were paralyzed. Perot later provided scholarships to the children of the servicemen killed in the failed Operation Eagle Claw.

Sounds like war to me, failed but warlike.

The Captain

3 Likes

Then you don’t understand war! Not surprising.

JimA

4 Likes

Explain?

The Captain

1 Like

The common thread is that the powers that be at the moment want industrial production to be less expensive. Damn all else.

During a prior administration (2015), we signed what was effectively a peace deal. The administration that followed initially extended the deal:

The Trump administration said Wednesday it will continue granting nuclear sanctions relief to Iran, keeping the Obama-era nuclear deal intact for now. But the U.S. also announced new unrelated sanctions in a bid to show it wasn’t letting Tehran off the hook.

Can you point to any other time in history where two countries “at war” are creating deals that, at least initially, survive two different administrations?

If the above fits the definition of war, then we are at war with Russia, North Korea, and China, to name a few.

While the current admin blocked Iranians from coming to the US on student visas, those already here were allowed to stay.

I don’t think it is common for parties at war to be actively engaged in educating the future leaders of the opposition. One would think that if we are indeed at war, all Iranians would have been expelled instead of being allowed to stay.

As of today, Iranians here on a valid visa are allowed to stay.

4 Likes

That was not the explanation I asked for

Maybe JimA will be kind enough to explain his opinion.

The Captain

2 Likes

Well, it seems to me that you and many others posting are going along with the ‘concept’ that we have been at war with Iran for some 47 years. Which is, of course, bull poo. Over time we seem to have deprecated the term ‘war’ by using it for all sorts of things. War on drugs, war on crime, or my fav, the war on terror. You can’t be at war with concepts, ideas, ideologies.

Of course, at this point, it is all irrelevant. Call it what you want. My nation has lost its soul and has joined the dark side. We are a rogue nation and will soon disappear into the dustbin of history. But at least people are making money!

JimA

8 Likes

The West has been at war with Islam since 622 AD. Iran is just the latest chapter.

Google AI:

The assertion that the West has been at war with Islam since 622 AD is a viewpoint that highlights long-standing historical conflict, though many historians characterize the 1,400-year relationship as a complex mix of war, trade, and cultural exchange rather than a continuous war.

Moshe Dayan said to read what your enemy writes. He said that had Gamal Abdel Nasser read his book about desert warfare Israel might have lost the Six Day War. I read:

  • The Holy Quran
  • Mein Kapf
  • Das Kapital

The Captain

2 Likes

I prefer language to mean something. Conflict is not war. For example, there is conflict between your views and mine and yet we are not at war.

JimA

8 Likes

When at any moment they kill my people, it’s war! Beirut barracks was war. US Embassy staff taken hostage was war. 9/11 was war. Oct 7 was war.

White wash all, you want but the corpses add up.

The Captain

6 Likes

No, it’s not! It is a crime. The only solution if we consider your viewpoint as declarative; exterminate the other side! Your viewpoint means that we cannot coexist as there will always be ‘event’s’, ‘crimes’, lone actors, depraved individuals.

JimA

9 Likes

Total BS. plus 20 characters

2 Likes

Would you care to clarify how or why it is BS?

How do you see us co-existing? Or is a ‘forever war’ your best idea? After all perpetual conflict has to make us stronger, right? A little bit of suffering is good for the soul! Hardship stiffens the back.

JimA

3 Likes

Read it to find out. I don’t think METaR wants us to discuss religion which is more divisive than politics. Don’t trust me, go to the source.

The Captain

3 Likes

Penetrating and perfectly crystallized argument.

Were you in debate club?

Manipulated data will screw AI’s ability to give correct answers.

3 Likes

GIGO

same as it ever was

3 Likes