Not another valuation metric!

Thanks, Bear.

I think the ratio is useful as it is relatively simple to calculate and provides another data point.

There is an easy way to calculate this that gives a good approximation as long as gross margins don’t fluctuate much from quarter to quarter. Just take the P/S and divide by the gross margin the past quarter.

As an example, PS of 15 divided by 0.8 (80% GM) gives the approximate P/GP of 18.8.

I’m sure others have figured that out already, but it makes the calculation a bit easier though not perfect. Since GM doesn’t fluctuate to a great degree with SaaS companies (CRWD excepted), I think it can be useful.

The highest two I’ve seen thus far are SHOP and CRWD at 44.1 and SHOP at 42.7.
On a forward basis, CRWD is far more reasonably valued.

I haven’t analyzed ZOOM and would expect it to have similar characteristics as CRWD.

Here is what I show for P/GP for several companies. The growth rates are mine and are revenue growth which also assumes gross margins are relatively steady over the next 12 months.


Ticker	P/GP    FP/GP	Growth%
AYX	20.1	13.4	50%
CRWD	44.1	24.5	80%
ESTC	24.1	16.1	50%
MDB	28.3	20.2	40%
PAYC	21.5	16.5	30%
ROKU	33.5	19.7	70%
SHOP	42.7	30.5	40%
TEAM	26.4	20.3	30%
TTD	20.4	15.1	35%
TWLO	20.9    14.9  	40%
ZS	24.5	16.9	45%

A.J.

8 Likes