It is really difficult for me to understand why they didn’t challenge Left to justify how his assertions
Andrew shared his notes with Jim Cramer beforehand and Jim looked at it and had nothing to push back. Just to be fair, Cramer did mention one of the board members is reputable, even though he didn’t like the small board and high turnover. On the other hand, Scott posted 4 questions on the twitter to “Robert Pera”, the CEO whom we all entrusted our money, had not answered it either. His only defense is we are buying back shares worth of $100M $$$.
I think the posters here are looking at this situation somewhat incorrectly. Don’t defend the company because you own the stock. Rather be overly critical because you own the stock. What is at stake is your money and you need to make sure it is absolutely in safe hands.