Even if successful, that would just give you one grafted plant. N-fixation wouldn’t be passed on to the next generation.
NOTE: I AINT talking about language agglomerating pretend sentience with its tendency towards ugly vulgar boobyhood; I am predicting the obvious, that the same techniques already revolutionizing human genomics, amino acid possibilities, and protein folding will move along nicely to other novel, profitable, and conceivably even good possibilities in agriculture.
d fb
Why would it matter that AI be used?
How would it matter?
Just another sales job for AI techs?
Big data? Yes, indeed it will take big data.
AI creates crazy derivative products. We have no control over it. The techs are trying to control the output now by limiting it. Oxymoron? While the techs need to expand it.
[quote=“Leap1, post:43, topic:104032, full:true”]
Why would it matter that AI be used?[/quote]
AI structures the biochemical possibilities through extremely rapid quantum computed sieves to find what is possible, and from what is possible what is utile.
d fb
Because AI working complex algorithms on massive models of how and whether amino acids could link and fold into desired proteins with desirable qualities could be done fast enough to economically arrive at rapid timely solutions to normally intratably tough problems.
We are discussing big data manipulation. That was going on before the sales job of AI.
I will admit advances in that data manipulation matter.
But the label AI is strange because this work has been going on long before AI.
I think there is a misunderstanding about AI. AI creates derivatives. It is not something that fixes anything.
Your accountant can not use AI to do your taxes. The IRS would notice.
I woke to NPR. A metrologist AI expert mentioned that “the weather is too complex right now” to get street-level accuracy. That last bit about “right now” showed me just how much of a crappy sales job AI is.
Just forget 1999 and the dot cons.