I asked for clarification of leverage generally and “capitalization” in particular in the context of the Well Fargo credit agreement. I received a prompt reply from Charles Meridan, cc to Eric Lipar.
“Leverage Ratio” means, for any fiscal quarter of Borrower, the ratio of (a) Consolidated Debt on the last day of such fiscal quarter to (b) Total
Capitalization on the last day of such fiscal quarter.
Page 32 - “ Total Capitalization ” means, for any fiscal quarter of Borrower, Consolidated Debt plus Tangible Net Worth.
Page 31 - “ Tangible Net Worth ” means, as of a given date, the stockholders’ equity of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries determined on a consolidated basis
minus the aggregate of all amounts appearing on the assets side of any such balance sheet for franchises, licenses, permits, patents, patent applications,
copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade names, goodwill, treasury stock, experimental or organizational expenses and other like assets which would be
classified as intangible assets under GAAP, all determined on a consolidated basis.
So it has nothing to do with market capitalization which, if it did, would not make any sense.
Well, on the latest balance sheet, stockholders’ equity is $406,361 which already excludes treasury stock. Goodwill and (to be safe) other assets are $12,081 and $6,453 which leaves $387,890 for tangible net worth. If you do the math, debt divided by debt plus tangible net worth being less than 0.6 results in a debt limit of 1.5 times tangible net worth. Anyone interested in this, please check my math. 1.5 times TNW of $387,890 equals $581,835. Liabilities are $525,316, leaving $56,519 available on the credit line. Somebody please check that? Because, in the last quarter LGI Homes borrowed $60,000 and burned through $22,218 of cash in order to increase real estate inventory by $116,654. O.k., the inventory increase adds to TNW and allows borrowing more… The additional $116,654 allowed the borrowing of $174,981. Sounds like a perpetual motion machine. Borrow to add inventory which allows more borrowing to buy more inventory. That explains why there is a covenant that limits the amount of real estate inventory based on some other formula which I have not parsed.
thanks to LGIH Investor Relations, and thanks to Fellow Fools who have persevered this far.
KC, who hopes to not have to go back to IR to check my calculations…