A childhood friend of mine wound up doing something that, only I’m pretty certain it was a federal thing. He practiced in rural Utah and Colorado. He split his time between different small towns out in the boonies.
2 Likes
We are going through this already in Missouri. Audrain County recently lost their hospital in the county seat, Mexico, MO. Now patients must drive 60 miles or so to Columbia or Hannibal.
If you are expecting a baby, can you wait that long? Or do you give birth at home? Or move to one of those cities close to your due date?
I can’t believe this is adequate health care for new mothers or their babies.
And yes, in an emergency they can call an air ambulance. Fees can be high. And insurance coverage iffy. For a baby delivery, doubtful.
Used to watch it regularly.
1 Like
They are.
The issue is not removing the hospitals. The issue is funding them.
Bringing down the cost and improving the care is to transport in patients to larger complexes for treatment.
Treatments these days means machinery. That is expensive for only a few rural patients. Also we are discussing in essences a myriad of medical problems. Plus it means specialists who are not necessarily in rural places. Plus it means techs who are not necessarily in rural areas.
In patient treatments no longer mean in bed on the ward with little done for you.
It also means rehabilitation and physical therapy which may not be available in rural areas.
In other words in patient treatment in rural areas may be dismal. Malpractice not to send people to urban or suburban centers for care.
1 Like
It doesn’t matter who owns the land. It takes people to manage and run them. These people need the rural hospitals/services.
1 Like
3.2 million dollars doesn’t seem like that much money to me for a hospital. But then again the long term care of patients is what really hurts profits. Patients who come into the hospital for a few days usually don’t eat up a hospitals resources like a sick patient who is in the hospital for a month. Also, the way insurance is set up, the longer a patient is in the hospital, the lower the hospital profits on the payments…doc
1 Like
Actually, it matters a lot. Corporations are able to hire people to work on the land the business owns. So providing health care to employees is a cost the corporation carries–or else they do not have good employees. The good employees get hired away and go elsewhere because health care is something of significant value to them.
Small farms can not afford to hire many workers because they only profit by having the small farm owner do a major share of the work and then get paid via farm profits–if any.
Well, no.
I agree entirely for the patients who need high-level care: urgent cardiac catheterization/angioplasty; high-risk OB; chemotherapy; emergent neurosurgery.
But a lot of community hospitalizations fall short of this.
Grandpa’s COPD flares. Two days of IV antibiotics, respiratory treatments, general tuneup and home.
Great-grandma is acutely confused. Ooops, she has a UTI. IV antibiotics, careful hydration and nursing, home (or previous care facility) by Monday afternoon.
Hunter Bob is brought in because he got lost/ran out of gas and is modestly hypothermic. Or, maybe he veered into a ditch, rolled his truck, hit his head. Overnight and home.
Dad has chest pain after shoveling snow. EKG and labs in ER are equivocal. Overnight monitoring and re-check labs; probably home in the morning with a cardiologist evaluation next week.
Teenage Tom does something stupid involving alcohol/drugs/his truck and fortunately needs only overnight observation and not ICU care while he comes down.
Sarah didn’t take her seizure meds, again, and spent too long outdoors until she was picked up. IV fluids for the kidneys, get seizure meds back on board, home in 48 hours
Aunt Edith got her chemo in the big city Wednesday, and is due back next Wednesday. It’s no Friday night and it’s snowing hard. She has a low-grade temp and feels rotten. She might well need a 100-mile transport back to the major medical center…or, she might not. Or, the roads might not be open, and the helicopter grounded.
You get the idea.
A country as rich as ours should be able to provide adequate rural health care for its people.
And, as far as the “I’m sick of their whining”…well, me too. (See my previous rants re: overheard conversations at the Redneck Cafe) (Kidding! Those were before the Great Purge)
But seriously: as a smarter, better man than I once said, “We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection.”
–sutton
who is not a fan of his species’ susceptibility to propaganda. Even the ones of average intelligence
3 Likes
The comment is about the need for rural services. It doesn’t matter who you are working for, yourself on a family farm or a corporate farm. The need for rural services is there.
True, but the level of services does not have to be a hospital. Perhaps a clinic with 2-4 staff (<–there is the major ongoing cost), 1-2 beds for a couple people needing to recover from something simple, and not much more. Thus, it would require an affiliation of some type with a larger system that would be able to justify those costs over a much larger group of patients (i.e. perhaps affiliated with corporate employer(s) in some way).
1 Like
It was said mostly tongue in cheek, but yes, when you look at the most anti-government, radicalized, and easily manipulated segment of the population you’ll find that it correlates nicely with the most rural parts of the geography.
It would be nice if someone would point out (to them) how they benefit from the government services that they decry. I do realize that is a fool’s errand because they don’t want to think about or be informed of it, and silo themselves to make sure their prejudices are not confronted.
It seems to me the only way to get through to them would be to remove those services in toto, although I would not seriously advocate that because, as others may have noticed, I have human feelings for others, even those with whom I disagree.
There is, however, a limit to the resources available via taxation (which they complain about) - as well as my patience. I would rather provide them some form of adequate health care than rural airports, but I don’t get to make that call. (I believe that rural health care can be provided for most care at a fraction of the cost of trying to equip every small hospital in Montana with a multi-million dollar MRI scanner or other high-cost super-specialized technological wondermachine.)
And yes, I like my food. I’m also aware it takes a small fraction of the number of people to produce it as it used to, and that number continues to decrease. That doesn’t mean they shouldn’t have anything in the way of medical resources, but there should be some semblance of reasonability of cost.
OK, but yeah, mostly it’s a rant about ingratitude. It’s not politics at all, it’s reality.
3 Likes
The article does say the stipend is for rural hospitals and doesn’t mention clinics which suggests that these facilities will have to meet a certain level of care…doc
A rural “hospital” does not have to be anything like an urban “hospital”. We see that in govt all the time. Same word used, but not even close to the same thing when used in a different situational context.
How were casualties handled in Iraq? Sticks in my mind the guys were stabilized in Iraq, then evaced to Ramstein, or to the US. Were there hospitals with hundreds of beds, giving the full course of treatment, and rehab, in country?
Steve
1 Like
There were a variety of military field hospitals in Iraq. I would say sort-of like a MASH unit, but I didn’t go too far into researching it. Info on the Internet if you want to learn more info.
1 Like
For the benefit of other participants in this thread, a bit on treating burn patients in Iraq.
The mean length of stay in the 28th CSH for U.S. and coalition burn patients was 2 days (range, 1–4 days). For Iraqi patients, the mean length of stay was 10 days (range, 1–53 days). Of the 42 U.S. and coalition patients, 35 were evacuated to LRMC, 6 were discharged to duty, and 1 died of wounds at the 28th CSH. Of the 44 Iraqi patients, 5 were evacuated to other hospitals in the region for humanitarian reasons, 18 were transferred to Iraqi facilities, 10 were discharged to home or to an enemy prisoner of war camp, and 7 died of wounds. (This position was not recorded for four.)
LRMC is Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, which is in Germany, near Ramstein Air Force Base. The Iraqis were there longer, because they could not be evaced out of country, because they were Iraqis.
Bottom line, anyone that can’t be discharged in a couple days, is transported to another hospital, hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away. There is no need for every little jerkwater town in the US to have a full service hospital, that can provide long term in-patient care.
Steve
1 Like
Sutton,
That is mostly ER care and other services. But it is not a full in patient stay. It is not rehabilitation. Most people are out of hospital after two days for almost anything. But if someone has had a car accident where in patient care is needed for weeks then realistically they need a bigger city care. We could be talking teams of doctors in an OR.
Moving such cases to the bigger hospitals is going to happen either way most of the time.
I agree with you 100% on the airports. I don’t think we need them, but the growing municipalities want them to attract businesses. Like you, I don’t get to make the call.
1 Like
The “JCs” want their airports. Detroit City airport is small and dilapidated, but it is close to downtown. A “JC” can land his Gulfstream at Detroit City, quick limo ride to downtown, 7.9 miles/14 minutes, vs 20 miles/21 minutes from Metro or 29 miles/30 minutes from Willow Run, so the city continues to take a loss on running the airport, for the convenience and comfort of the “JCs”.
Battle Creek’s airport styles itself as an “executive” airport, as it primarily serves the honchos at Kellogg and Post, not the general public.
Neither airport has any scheduled airline service.
Steve
1 Like
The Essential Air Service is not available to them. In order to qualify an airport has to be at least 70 miles from another “hub” airport (more than one carrier), has to have regularly scheduled service by at least one carrier, and {a bunch of other requirements I’ve forgotten}.
The contracts for subsidy come up once a decade or so (again, IIRC) and occasionally lapse due to lack of interest.
2 Likes