It seems to me, though I’m no techie, that NTNX has picked HCI to bet on, and built its core business around that. It has other innovative irons in the fire as you’ve pointed out, but I don’t know how big they are at present, or how much they depend on the HCI core offering.
I’m concerned there might be many other ways to solve the same problem other than HCI, and that it might fall out of favor like Hadoop, and that’s why I’m just not interested.
Bear
I have heard no rumors of an HCI-killer in the wings.
Typically when a new technology gets hot, it starts in the fringes due to being considered “1.0” and many clients, especially larger enterprises, won’t jump in heavy into 1.0 releases of anything.
So even if a new disruptive technology comes out, it will likely be a couple years before it starts being meaningful/realistic as a replacement on-site. Amazon is working on “Outposts” which is new and not yet released, but I am less concerned about AWS as the trend in the larger Enterprises seems to be towards Azure due to tendency for Amazon to compete against everyone, and Microsoft already has a relationship with all the Enterprises and bundles Azure into the mix to get clients to adopt and use.
So could Azure/Microsoft create a competitive product to HCI? Maybe, but they have had Hyper-V competitor to VMware’s hypervisor for a decade or so and haven’t dented VMWare’s marketshare…I just don’t think getting into on-prem HCI-like hardware is of interest to Microsoft.
I mentioned elsewhere that had a sharp NetApp technical leader state to me a few weeks ago that he saw the future of storage as:
HCI predominantly for all storage needs, at edge and in DC.
Remaining storage footprint would be more the traditional SAN (NetApp, Pure, EMC) loaded up with GPUs and primarily used for data analytics.
NetApp now has an HCI solution too, so that doesn’t go against NetApp’s future, but it does inadvertently create a plug for NTNX, NVDA, and even AYX if you think it through.
I have heard similar thoughts/feelings in from multiple vendors/articles over the past year, it seems.
The strength of a platform, like HCI, can also be gauged by the “me too” type of imitation you see with multiple vendors all touting that they also have an HCI solution, such as:
HPE - organically, and via acquisition of SimpliVity
Cisco - Hyperflex
NetApp - newer entry
Dell/EMC/VMware - vxrail, vsan
Lenovo - reselling Nutanix
Dell - reselling Nutanix
Then, when they can’t win any longer, usually two things happen:
- the vendor not succeeding in that space will tout a competing product and bash the leaders
- the vendor not succeeding in that space will capitulate and form a partnership (an example here could be HPE eventually deciding to “bless” and tout the use of Nutanix on their servers, which they do not do today.
There are no guarantees in investments, so I can only state that I see no catalysts approaching that will definitely disrupt the HCI growth in IT over the next couple years, which the folks at IDC/Gartner seem to agree with.
Dreamer