Saul's Board

While you cannot value a growth stock with the same metrics you do a value stock, valuation still matters…

There is only one correct way to value any investment, and that is through (estimated) discounted cash flows. You can do that for any stock. The big trick, of course, is estimating the future cash flows (and the appropriate discount rate, both of which are affected by the topic of this METAR board). This exercise can be done even for an investment in a company that isn’t currently producing earnings.

That future cash flows may be highly uncertain for such a company is true but somewhat beside the point. One can determine what revenue growth rates and operating margins would be required over, say, the next 5 or 10 years in order to make the stock a good (risk-adjusted) value at its current price. Then the investment question boils down to the plausibility of those required outcomes. Morningstar analysts, for example, do this all the time. Of course, their estimates often turn out to be far from the mark.

At least a few people on Saul’s board discuss such things, more or less. Saul himself points broadly in this direction when he discusses such things as TAM (total addressable market), plausible future revenue paths, plausible operating margins, etc.

The central claim of that board (which mirrors that of TMF Rule Breakers) is that if you can figure out whether a fairly new company has a huge TAM in front of it and has some reasonably durable advantage in service, personnel, or (preferably) both, then if you buy the stock and hang on long enough, the cream will rise to the top. The corollary claim is that SAASy companies comprise unrivaled terrain for finding such opportunities.

I’ve never been able to do that. But I accept that a few folks have been able to do so fairly reliably. David Gardner is one. Saul may be another, although he does appear to piggyback on DG and a guy on SA (Bert H). But I’ve not been able to do that consistently, either.

Fungi (who is looking to pick up a few tasty scraps that are, or once were, on Saul’s table now that they’re getting hacked to pieces)

9 Likes

Oxytocin is the loving, tend and befriend hormone. I don’t see a lot of that on Saul’s board.

I think you probably mean dopamine and/ or testosterone.
Wendy

5 Likes

been at MF since 1997
dot com
2008

I am mostly in Vanguard, some in BRK and MKL.

some in Saul

You know, Saul posts EVERY SINGLE WEEK the purpose of his board. He posts links, he post cautions, he posts the rules. Saul’s Board is not for beginners, not for people who don’t know what a FCF is nor for the faint of heart. These issues are clearly stated, repeatedly (at least weekly). One of the issues is posting on topic. Posts are not deleted if there is a specific discussion about the valuation of a company. But, as he says, one doesn’t post about tacos on a French cooking board. But Saul’s Board does point out where tacos can be discussed.

I would say Saul’s disclaimers would hold up quite nicely in a court of law.

Or are you a fan of the weekly Motley Fool’s “Rare all in” posts?

19 Likes

Saul doesn’t have to apologize for anything ! He is not selling anything, he is not doing
any sort of “pump & dump”, he explicitly states to not blindly follow what he does.
Do your own homework ( due diligence ), and live with the results. Know your own
personal risk tolerance, it almost certainly is different than Saul’s risk tolerance.

14 Likes

Saul doesn’t have to apologize for anything ! … Know your own personal risk tolerance, it almost certainly is different than Saul’s risk tolerance

WOW

Here’s a chart of PTON a former Saul stock:

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PTON/chart?p=PTON#eyJpbnRlcn…

As you can see it was extremely time-dependent (rich people in lock-down), really not a growth stock at all.

**Octaazacubane** is predicted to have an energy density (assuming decomposition into N2) of 22.9 MJ/kg,[4] which is over 5 times the standard value of TNT...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octaazacubane

Saul has a rare talent for juggling explosives. This is not something to be encouraged in the general population. There is a time premium in most of his stocks, and that decays quickly, faster even than the companies will run out of IPO money.

2 Likes

I think you probably mean dopamine and/ or testosterone.

DOLLARine… :innocent:

The Captain
no longer posts at Saul’s but Saul’s record is fantastic.

The difficulty is that late comers buy at the top. Valuation, specially DCF, are quite useless for hyper-growth stocks. A better approach is to understand the business model and concepts like the “S” curve and the Technology Adoption Life Cycle [TALC]. David Skok has great videos to understand the SaaS model.

David Skok of Matrix Partners: Driving SaaS Success Using Key Metrics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCBccKfG9U0&t=197s

What many investors fail to understand is that stock prices tend to be correlated to the general market and that different classes of stocks (value, growth, safety, etc.) tend to rotate as market favorites. If a growth stock does not have a long term future then it’s a risky investment. Growth stocks are also extremely volatile and if you don’t have the stomach or other body parts able to deal with it, then don’t invest in growth.

My suggestion, if you are not a growth investor don’t post at Saul’s and specially don’t preach brimstone and hellfire because you are going to be deleted for good reason.


I have been expecting a correction for quite a long while but it was only in early December that I finally decided to be on the sidelines except for my high conviction stocks and it’s not over yet. Better late than broke so I’m just watching the market play out.

9 Likes

Hi Ralph,

Thanks for the reply and clarification. I was aware that Saul’s board was tightly managed, but I also thought that a well-reasoned, objective post would not be yanked. I was wrong.

I’ll stick to my VALUE investing and leave the high flyers to those that can run with Saul!!

HNY!
'38Packard

2 Likes

Hey RWRocks,

I’ve also been on the MF since 1998, You have me beat. I have also been through the dot com bust and the bust in 2008 as well. Not a newbie.

I get that the board rules are posted every week. Not sure if you saw my post before getting yanked, but I thought it would be a helpful post for those that are newbies - and you know there are TONS of newbies following Saul - just look at the number of recs that each post gets.

I was trying to be “Foolish” in posting “another side of the story” for others, sharing - that’s what TMF is all about.

'38Packard

  • Who is not aware of the MF’s “rare all in” posts.
2 Likes

What I see here is a lot of off and on standards of conduct, depending on who is posting.

Lucky Dog

4 Likes

Saul eats his own cooking. He has been a gifted stock picker over the past couple of years, picking stocks which were accelerated by the rather unique economic and psychological environment during the past two years.

That said, there is no shortage of other stock-picking models which have been highly successful, only to be deflated for one reason or another.

We each have the opportunity to place bets where we wish in the casino. Placing them on the same squares as the guy who’s hot can be very profitable - until it’s not.

This board is a good starting place to acquire the basis of thinking for yourself - and doubting the near-deity status given to those who are currently successful.

You are responsible for your money - handle those chips with care.

Jeff

4 Likes

There are two basic types of investors: value investors and growth investors.

A third and arguably better type of investor is an index fund investor who just buys a bit of everything.

It is important to keep in mind that for at least 20 years, since the Dot Com crash, that the core reason that the Motley Fool website has existed was to sell any of about 40 stock picking services.

https://www.fool.com/services/

It has been years since I looked at any of them but I would assume that they are heavily into growth and momentum stocks and that the competing free information on Saul’s popular board is tolerated since they can pass on many of his recommendations to the people that are paying for subscriptions.

Way back in the 1990’s when the Fool was starting the story about how the “Motley Fool” got it’s name was that even a “fool” could beat the “wise” just by buying index funds or using a few simple strategies like the original “Foolish Four” or the “Dogs of the Dow”.

It is not surprising that trying to post information there on value investing was not well received since overall that is not the focus of the Motley Fool now. The METAR board is a bit of an aberration here, sort of like the lone salad on a menu at a fast food restaurant.

3 Likes

“Saul has a rare talent for juggling explosives. This is not something to be encouraged in the general population. There is a time premium in most of his stocks, and that decays quickly, faster even than the companies will run out of IPO money”

Saul EXPLICITLY tells people to NOT blindly follow what he does. His asset allocation, to me,
is far beyond anything I can tolerate. As far as PTON, he dislikes companies that sell
hardware. and makes a pretty logical case for why he feels that way. Yes, PTON sells
software subscription services, but last time I looked you had to have 1 of their bikes to use
the services. I made some money on PTON, also left some on the table, as I sold after thinking
about their business model and how it would hold up after people started leaving their homes
for their exercise routines. Just seemed logical that sales would slow, and I never looked back
since then, so not even sure how it all unfolded.

This is the last I’ll post on this, his record and transparency speak for themselves.
He is not a financial service, he’s not getting paid to give people stock recs.
His board tries to be laser focused on hi-growth companies. It is all out in the open,
no surprises at all.

17 Likes

This is the last I’ll post on this, his record and transparency speak for themselves.
He is not a financial service, he’s not getting paid to give people stock recs.
His board tries to be laser focused on hi-growth companies. It is all out in the open,
no surprises at all.

Yes!

I don’t get this ‘dump on Saul’s Board’ here. Yes, it is a tightly controlled board that I myself never post on since I don’t have the desire to spend a lot of time analyzing, then organizing, then writing posts on the various companies that Saul looks at. And I recognize that the board is not one to just cast random thoughts upon or ask for “today’s best stock” to invest in. That said, I have been fortunate to be able to view and use the information from his board over the years. Also, Saul has not been successful in the past couple years, but for the past few decades of investing. His record is not a temporary fluke. He is very transparent about what he has done in the past and what he is doing now.

It seems some people just want to post whatever they want, whenever they want, wherever they want. There are some places on TMF that are better than others for this. Not Saul’s board.

Pete

25 Likes

MataroPete: I don’t get this ‘dump on Saul’s Board’ here.

I think I get part of it. .
It’s about not knowing one’s actual Risk Tolerancs.

:thinking:
ralph

1 Like

Hey Fellow Fools,

I’m pretty sure that there are some folks that post here that also post (or at least follow) the Saul board.

I was a holdout to jump on the Saul board as I lived through the 2002 tech debacle and really wanted to stay away from high risk tech stocks. However, after being on the sidelines for many years, I discussed with my wife to check out some of the stocks that the folks on the Saul board follow and do some research to see if we could jump on the Saul bandwagon with a very small number of shekels. I admit to envisioning a 50% in a short amount of time.

That was in mid-October.

We all know what has happened to the Saul stocks since mid-October. Most have been slammed.

We invested in one of Saul’s picks - UPST - Upstart, an AI lending platform that has had a great track record, had solid expansion plans in place and was executing against them. They claimed (and many agree) that their AI platform takes a lot of the “bias” out of the approval process which allows folks that are underserved in the credit market to get approved. I liked that story. They currently service the personal loan market, but are now expanding into the auto lending market. It is a great story.

Unfortunately, a great story and macro economics don’t always jive and UPST is down 65% since we bought. The Nasdaq has been taking a beating lately. (With more to come - I’m sure).

Again, this was a small position and I’m not losing sleep over it, but it just goes to show that VALUATION (the price that you pay for a given stock) matters.

I tried posting a similar post on Saul’s board twice now, and both posts have been yanked. I want to let folks know on this board that the Saul board is heavily censored and anyone who posts anything about valuation, about losing money, etc. will most likely have their post pulled.
Packard,

Packard, Respectfully, lets go over a few things you said here. Firstly I don’t post too much anymore, as don’t really have too much to say, plus getting on and health not the best, but in this case, it does merit an answer.

First, having followed Saul for many years and seen my portfolio in the last 4 years increase 12 fold(that includes up to last night)plus having gone through(numerous times) what you are obviously feeling at present, drops of 50% and more as in Upst, why when you state, “it is a great story” did you invest in it in the first place if you are not prepared to take the rough with the smooth? Unfortunately for you as so many others, the rough hit the fan a lot sooner than you expected but I don’t believe it gives you the right to basically attack Saul and his board.

Valuation matters you say. Sure, if you are/were intelligent enough to buy say ENPH at under $2.00 only a few years ago now and get out at 280. Now down like everything else to $153.00. How’s the valuation now for you, better or still overpriced? Do you believe in this Company or not? I think you are just p*ssed(albeit you say you will lose no sleep over this) that you got in at a much higher price and didn’t do your own homework when it was so much cheaper and would actually be in profit!

As other posters have said. Saul begs you not to follow him and of course he has to monitor closely or it would get totally out of control(I very rarely have posted on Metar but you have some fantastic posters therein) but over the years have seen how carefully Wendy manages things when it appears to be out of control and great job she has done. Each week Saul posts on Monday the rules of HIS Board and has to do this, as if he allowed you to discuss as you say “valuation and losing money” his board would be hit with literally hundreds of similar posts which would end up having no “valuation” to his own Board. Seems harsh to you and you do appear slightly upset(this too shall pass)but they are his rules and if you don’t like them, well you know the answer, but to warn off others, as to his rules and methods,I believe was off base, which if you had read the knowledgebase, don’t think you would have brought this up.

Lastly, your definition of playing with fire, your gonna get burnt, plus get in early, not late! Well the later statement albeit appears obvious but is it? I brought Shopify in late 2016, that was early. I again brought in 7 times up until June last year. MDB Feb 2018 and 4 times over the years. Both down this year, so what? This year, 4 trading days into it!!! My mistakes, many! Horrible. It hurt in 17/18 when I got too cocky and then around 2019 learnt to just take the loss and move on, don’t look back or move elsewhere into a Net, Cvna, Data, etc(all down big and again so what), I believe in them until the story changes. Oh and I brought more Data twice this year on the way down. Is that playing with Fire, I don’t know the answer, but does that give you the right to condone someone else’s methods that are obviously alien to yours. Again, Respectfully, but I don’t think so.
p.s. Regardless, Wish you well and prosperous.

8 Likes

On the other hand, you may also want to consider Saul’s 35 year investing record.

Pete

I think the issue for many of us, is that Saul was down 68% in 2008, which means from late 2007-early 2009 he was down more than that.

Most investors, newbie or otherwise, cannot stomach losing 3/4ths of their investable assets or retirement funds. If you have to take 4-5% out every year and that happens to you, you get wiped out.

Saul can, so kudos to him, and he’s crushed it lately with SaaS. But the overwhelming majority of people at TMF certainly can not. Stories like these losses – based on overvaluation – would be helpful to those trying to learn more.

To his credit, he has mentioned how much he lost in that calendar year but doesn’t warn people that their losses going forward, can be that large, that quickly. Doubly so for super-hi-beta stocks. It’s nearly always about how ‘good companies always bounce back, etc.’

He has built a nice nest egg and can withstand a 50-70% loss. How many of his followers can say the same? How many will sell at the worst possible time? One wonders.

Long a few of those SaaS names myself,
Naj

ps FWIW: According to Bernstein Research a 60% stock/40% bond portfolio is a 50-1 shot against to suffer a 50% loss over 30 years. A 100% diversified stock portfolio has a 2.33-1 shot of losing half their assets.

6 Likes

That said, there is no shortage of other stock-picking models which have been highly successful, only to be deflated for one reason or another.

Not to mention models which are successful when implemented by people who really understand the models and know the limits of both the model and themselves, but rather unsuccessful otherwise.

One should also note that

“stock held by Saul” is not the same as “stock discussed on Saul’s board”

There are stocks that get heavily discussed and widely owned that Saul himself never buys … or buys and then exits well ahead of many others.

Check out

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15WYEG7cX2mdErck42Im4…

to see the distribution of who holds what and the number holding each stock. Go back a few months to see how fast it changes.

I get that it is annoying to have a post pulled … happened to me a few times. But, in Saul’s board case, it is very transparent what the rules are.

I get that the high risk and portfolio concentration are not everyone’s cup of tea, but if it isn’t, just look elsewhere … no need to dump on it.

10 Likes

'38Packard,

Although this thread (predictably) descended into a session on the pro/con on Saul’s culture, I would be remiss if I didn’t point you in the direction of a couple of other boards to post.

https://discussion.fool.com/abandoned-arctic-outpost-13-122677.a… Champico is a great host
https://discussion.fool.com/where-angels-fear-to-tread-113694.as… Dreamer follows some interesting ideas and also considers some options from others
https://discussion.fool.com/new-paradigm-investing-114933.aspx Or, perhaps, with the Captain?

Mostly,

I’d encourage you to post your thoughts somewhere not on Saul’s board. The valuation discussion isn’t taboo, it’s just hard to standardize with a company who’s error bars on the growth expectations are often of the same magnitude or larger than the entire growth results for most companies.

Trying to do a 10 year evaluation with 100% growth and a taper of 6%? -20%? additional growth? It’s tough sledding. There are enough levers to pull that posts on valuation have literally filled up the board, risking the loss of company specific info, metrics, exploration and summary thoughts.

As a result, building a DCF or other valuation method would be welcomed on those other boards and would like spur on some excellent thoughts. I hope to see the discussion and join in when you do.

(I missed your original posts on Sauls, apparently)

1 Like

There are two basic types of investors: value investors and growth investors.

There seems to be a third type growing in number out there. Those to whom neither value nor growth matter, let’s call them meme investors*. Someone might say that they are like momentum investors, but that isn’t really true, because momentum investors also look for downward momentum, this new group doesn’t.

  • A meme investor informally gets together with other meme investors and choose a particular stock (or other instrument, like NFTs, etc), seemingly randomly (not growth, not value, not anything) and then all pile in driving the price higher. Sometimes they even have their own “language” around what they do, with acronyms for “holding forever” and similar.
2 Likes