The economic problems of terrorism in places we do not think of at all

The Islamic world is a mix of the First World and the Third World. The conflicts in this world amount to $100s of billions of dollars and a huge loss of life.

The UN needs to regulate Muslim countries to stop this. The ICC needs to investigate all of these leaders who allow this. I suspect a lot of the violence is on purpose on both sides of these wars. Much of it entangles innocent lives and children.

Human and Geographic Toll

  • Concentration: Over 90% of terrorist attacks and deaths occur inside active conflict zones, heavily concentrated in regions like the Central Sahel and South Asia.
  • Indirect Losses: Long-term reductions in regional per capita income, increased insurance premiums, and systemic market uncertainty. [1, 2, 3]

Global databases like the University of Maryland’s Global Terrorism Database (GTD) do not officially track or categorize terrorist attacks by the specific religion of the perpetrators. This is because many groups have political, nationalist, or secular motives mixed with religious identity, and the precise ideological affiliation remains unknown in a large share of global incidents. [1, 2, 3, 4]

However, specialized research organizations and think tanks track subsets of religious extremism—most notably Islamist extremism and far-right/Christian identity or nationalist extremism in Western nations. [5, 6]

Islamist Extremism (Global Estimates)

  • Data scope: Studies tracking militant Islamist or Salafi-jihadist groups (such as Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, and the Taliban) show a high concentration of global activity.
  • Recorded figures: Research by organizations like the Fondation pour l’innovation politique (Fondapol) reported roughly 66,872 Islamist-inspired terrorist attacks resulting in over 249,941 deaths worldwide between 1979 and April 2024.
  • Geographic distribution: Over 85% of these incidents occurred in Muslim-majority countries across the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa. [7, 10]

Religious Extremism in the United States

  • Data scope: Domestic data compiled by institutions like the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) look at domestic plots and attacks.
  • Recorded figures: Between 1994 and mid-2020, domestic violent far-right extremists (white supremacists, anti-government groups) accounted for the majority of attacks/plots (roughly 57% to 67%), while left-wing groups accounted for about 20% to 25%, and religious/jihadist extremists accounted for roughly 7% to 15%. However, single large-scale religious events like the September 11 attacks mean religious terrorism accounts for a higher total fatality count historically in the U.S. [5, 8]

Key Nuances in Data Collection

  • Motive vs. Religion: Experts emphasize that violent acts carried out by individuals or groups who claim a religious identity are often driven primarily by political grievances, territorial control, or poverty rather than theology alone.
  • Attribution Gaps: In roughly 50% of all global incidents logged in major tracking databases, the exact perpetrator group or explicit motivation cannot be definitively verified from available media or governmental reports. [2]

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1] https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/terrorism-immigration

[2] https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30883058

[3] https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/79814/ssoar-jlibertyintaff-2022-2-oyime_adejumo_et_al-Terrorism_and_Abrahamic_religious_tradition.pdf?sequence=1

[4] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178918300703

[5] https://www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_extremism

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism

[8] https://www.csis.org/analysis/war-comes-home-evolution-domestic-terrorism-united-states

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism

[10] https://www.csis.org/analysis/islam-and-patterns-terrorism-and-violent-extremism

1 Like

How the heck does the UN ‘Regulate’ a country? That’s funny. If there is a country ripe for ‘regulation’, it’s probably the good ol’ USA.

7 Likes

They don’t. There is no such thing.

Not really.

4 Likes

Tell the sovereign power what can not be done with their land. Simple. Decide for another country whatever the majority wants in the UN.

Many of the disputes are a result of borders drawn by France and the UK. The terrorism is killing a lot of Muslim children. Just recarve up the map. Decide who gets what. Tell them repeatedly how evil their government is. Focus only on the Muslim countries and get it done. Save lives. Create human rights. Etc…

But even before France and the UK drew the map the Arab Empire forced all sorts of brutality on people till this day.

Honestly it would not have any teeth, but we could find plenty of bigots to agree that those countries are wrong. We could constantly harp on them. I am sure plenty of people would agree.

There is plenty of precedents. All the UN votes against the Israelis are more than all the votes combined against all other nations. So it does go on. People believe the UN is some sort of upper stage place for resolutions.

The West Bank has had several sovereign powers. The largest share of the land is sovereign.

This actually has proven the main business of the UN.

Let’s save Muslim children. You are for that? 66k terrorist acts mostly in Muslim nations.

Of course - save us all would be good. I don’t see any country willing to be regulated. Who regulates the regulators?

It has no teeth.

But this satire should be a wake up call for a few people here who believe the UN.

Worse our dear leader thinks he can get it done. That is the scariest part of him.

At the same time shutting out oil and gas from the market is the right thing to do.