# Who is working at DOGE **URL:** \ **Category:** Macro Economic Trends and Risks\ **Created:** [February 4, 2025, 11:18pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/who-is-working-at-doge/113087 "2025-02-04T23:18:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 4\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![buynholdisdead](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/buynholdisdead/32/12874_2.png) [@buynholdisdead](https://discussion.fool.com/u/buynholdisdead)\ **Post date:** [February 4, 2025, 11:18pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/who-is-working-at-doge/113087/1 "2025-02-04T23:18:27Z")
The youngest in the team is 19-year-old Edward Coristine, who is still attending college. Along with Coristine, fellow engineers are 21-year-old Akash Bobba, 22-year-old Ethan Shaotran, 23-year-old Luke Farritor, 24-year-old Gautier Cole Killian and the oldest of the bunch is 25-year-old Gavin Kliger, reported Daily Mail. > **[These 6 baby-faced DOGE engineers form the crack team of Elon Musk; here's...](https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/these-6-baby-faced-doge-engineers-form-the-crack-team-of-elon-musk-heres-how-they-are-slashing-government-costs/articleshow/117925295.cms?from=mdr)** > > Elon Musks latest venture DOGE has a fresh, tech-driven twist. Hes tapped a group of six young engineers, some still in college, to shake up the government and make it more efficient. ---
**Author:** ![Leap1](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/leap1/32/72176_2.png) [@Leap1](https://discussion.fool.com/u/Leap1)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2025, 12:19am UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/who-is-working-at-doge/113087/2 "2025-02-05T00:19:42Z")
They are developing leverage plans. 1 Shocking action 2 Back room deal 3 Everyone looks bad but the two divorced guys in charge do not mind looking like crap 4 Our rights, money, freedoms, etc are under siege 5 People are beginning to turn each other in 6 Justice, FBI, and Military are controlled. You do not want to see how controlled but you will. ---
**Author:** ![Neuromancer](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/neuromancer/32/4361_2.png) [@Neuromancer](https://discussion.fool.com/u/Neuromancer)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2025, 8:09pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/who-is-working-at-doge/113087/3 "2025-02-05T20:09:21Z")
Should we assign them a security detail? If not, why not? ---
**Author:** ![jerryab2](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/motleyfoolfree/user_avatar/discussion.fool.com/jerryab2/32/3274_2.png) [@jerryab2](https://discussion.fool.com/u/jerryab2)\ **Post date:** [February 5, 2025, 9:43pm UTC](https://discussion.fool.com/t/who-is-working-at-doge/113087/4 "2025-02-05T21:43:33Z")
The most damage will be done to themselves by themselves when they try to _prove_ anything they claim. They simply have no usable data. Then they become professionally “incompetent” and get fired for cause.