AFOP thoughts

AFOP reported yesterday and guided flat revenue for next quarter. So TTM adj EPS is $1.33 so the P/E is currently 9.9. Next quarter, we can expect $0.35 or 3% y/y adj EPS growth.

I read the earnings call transcript today. Below are some important things and what I think:

  1. Sales below guidance due to lower than expected sales of their largest customer. This is a US customer in the datacom segment so I’m guessing it’s either Google or Apple. This customer represents about 35% of AFOP’s business (down from about 42% in the previous quarter, but part of this decline is just be that they ordered less this quarter). The good news is that the CEO (of AFOP) said that orders from this customer have resumed and that AFOP does not think that they lost any business to a competitor.

  2. Sales in datacom and telecom are strong and look good going forward. Yet the company is guiding flat y/y sales. These 2 points seem to contradict each other. If you read the transcript, you will probably get the sense that management thinks that the business is strong and growth prospects are unchanged.

  3. We seem to still be in the midst of the telecom upgrade cycle. I predicted and still predict that this upgrade cycle will slow sales into the telecom market in 2016. I was planning on getting out of the stock about a year from now.

  4. CEO has said and continues to say that datacom is not cyclical like telecom and that we can expect growth for an extended period. Datacom/telecom revenue split for AFOP was 60/40. The prior two quarters it was 70/30. So in 2016, 30% of their sales may start to dramatically decline.

  5. Stock is cheap (if growth resumes). Hopefully, growth in sales and EPS will resume in the Dec14 and Mar15 quarters. If so, then the stock should go back up. I will likely exit my position next Summer. For now, I see no reason to sell but 3 flat quarters are keeping me from adding to my 3.5% position.

Chris

Chris

14 Likes

Thanks Chris for the sober analysis amid this largely overdone selloff. While the quarter was not great compared to last quarter’s blowout, it was still solid. However, I was expecting at least 25% growth over the same quarter last year. If they can consistently grow in the high teens for the next couple years though, we will still do well.

Someone posted a bearish article on Seeking Alpha today, mainly concerning their dependence on one large customer:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/2351165?source=ipadportfolio…

1 Like

this kred and aeye are disappointing

specially when u buy at the top

this kred and aeye are disappointing… specially when u buy at the top

I know others don’t agree, but I still think a good chunk of the AEYE run-up was due to demand from readers of the board – probably coupled with momentum traders. This is a tiny company and, as we’ve all filled out our initial positions, there’s been less demand for shares and so the price has fallen. Anyway, that’s my view of things. :wink:

Earnings come out in a couple weeks, and then we’ll likely see the price driven more by the business (at least for a while), but I think this will be a very volatile stock and investors should really have their eye on the future of the business rather than any weekly swings resulting from short-term ebb and flow of demand for shares.

KRED may be something similar, but its business also looks weak to me. Comps against 2013 (when the company was capital constrained) look good, but against 2012 do not so far. They have signed a number of interesting distribution agreements, but at the end of the day their success will be determined by growth in actual consumer demand for their products – and, IMHO, I don’t see that yet in their numbers.

Neil
Long AEYE

3 Likes

3) We seem to still be in the midst of the telecom upgrade cycle. I predicted and still predict that this upgrade cycle will slow sales into the telecom market in 2016. I was planning on getting out of the stock about a year from now.

I disagree with this statement. I do not know how anyone can see that far into the future. This upgrade cycle is not like the last few upgrade cycle but is more in line with the Analog to Digital cyle only bigger in my opinion. All the business’s, small, medium, and large are going to fiber. The copper plant is obsolete and fiber is being ran into the business’s where Fiber Optical Terminals(FOT’s) have to be placed. The Broadband companies have to place Fot’s in their Central Offices, and at the customer’s site. The customer should place a FOT next to the BroadBand customer and another one in their Suite. I have seen 3 Data centers open up just in my area this year. Also I have been talking to one of the long haul techs and he said they just installed a 15 terrabit leg from Denver to Chicago in the last 6 months. They also are starting to install a 3 terrabit leg from Las Vegas to Los Angeles and they expect that to grow to 15 terrabit.

Infinera says that they expect the Metro area to start off in the middle of 2015. This will be a bigger market than the long haul. The local Metro is now going to fiber and trying to replace copper. This will take time because not only is it expensive but its labor intensive. All of this will take Afop’s products but they will have to win the market. To say that this will slow in 2016 is only a guess and I think needs to be tempered. Anything can happen and I want to see that growth starting to slow before I make any predictions. As for right now the growth is only exploding.

Andy

2 Likes

this kred and aeye are disappointing… specially when u buy at the top

I think most people here bought these stocks thinking they MIGHT have a future (in years) and not for short term quick gains (in weeks or months) IMO.

If you want to make a short term profit and also want it to be meaningful, you will need to buy 10s of thousands of shares. That is way to risky for me. OTOH, if you buy, say, 3 thousand share for short term gain, then whatever you may gain is not worth the lost sleep. IMO, these stocks are not likely to go up too much short term as it takes time for the business to grow.

KRED is more capital intensive (manufacturing, distribution and etc) whereas AEYE is more scalable but I am less comfortable with its executive team.

Just a thought.

-M

5 Likes

Infinera says that they expect the Metro area to start off in the middle of 2015. This will be a bigger market than the long haul. The local Metro is now going to fiber and trying to replace copper. This will take time because not only is it expensive but its labor intensive. All of this will take Afop’s products but they will have to win the market. To say that this will slow in 2016 is only a guess and I think needs to be tempered. Anything can happen and I want to see that growth starting to slow before I make any predictions. As for right now the growth is only exploding

Andy, thanks for your opinion. Mine was based on past upgrade cycles. Regardless, we should see business among suppliers (in aggregate) pick in 2015. If AFOP sales continue to be flat after next quarter while competitors’ business expands then we have a problem.

Regarding your opinion of metro (as opposed to long haul) buildout, how big do you think this opportunity is and how long do you think the build out will continue? And what are the risks associated? And do AFOP’s current product mix address this opportunity? Thanks.

Chris

1 Like

Currently, Google has launched the service in just two cities and the company has announced plans to roll out the service in another 34 cities. As a percentage of the total revenue, Alliance Fiber has probably one of the highest exposures to this rollout among networking equipment vendors. After the favorable response that the service has received in Kansas and Provo, there is little doubt about the predictability of the Google’s fiber optic expansion plans, so the current weakness seems more Alliance specific.

But per this poster,
physmech:

AFOP is involved with Google’s data centers (datacom) and not their Google Fiber (telecom).

Another physmech:
Here are my revised non-(Google?) underlying quarter-over-quarter revenue growth figures. From the conference call, COO Hubbard said their “main customer” was “low 40’s in the first quarter, mid 30’s in the second quarter”. So:

1Q14 non-Google revenue: $24.8M x 0.575 = $14.26M (using Google @42.5%)
2Q14 non-Google revenue: $24.2M x 0.650 = $15.73M (using Google @35%)

$15.73M / $14.26M = 1.103 (10.3% growth rate, QoQ)

So google is back to buying for their data centers, “other” business expansion continues at 10% so I see this as a nice entry point to write some 12.5 Strike for an almost 3% return/month for 2.7 months. Push comes to shove and I’ll own AFOP in September for $11.80/share.

What do you think, Gaucho? SInce I completely sold all my AFOP a ways back, I have no position and getting in here seems like a good bet
M

this kred and aeye are disappointing

Hi Rizz,

Well…I agree.

I own both and in decent quantities (for the size of the companies) but I think it is too early to worry about their future. Sure, they are risks and let’s hope they work some magic. The wheel hasn’t stopped turning and the ball hasn’t selected a number nor color yet.

KRED is working hard on distribution contracts so hopefully in time, those expansions will become sales increases.

AEYE…we just need more info to understand where they are headed.

I’m a hold and watching carefully for now.
Mykie

Mine was based on past upgrade cycles. Regardless, we should see business among suppliers (in aggregate) pick in 2015. If AFOP sales continue to be flat after next quarter while competitors’ business expands then we have a problem.

I agree Chris if Afop can not grow in this market then they will have a big problem. They need to get out there and take market share. I am going to evaluate them at the end of the year.

Regarding your opinion of metro (as opposed to long haul) buildout, how big do you think this opportunity is and how long do you think the build out will continue? And what are the risks associated? And do AFOP’s current product mix address this opportunity? Thanks.

This is what Tom Fallon stated on Infinera’s last conference call. I trust what he has to say because I have always seen his statements as conservative and muted. That could be one of the reasons Infinera just can’t take off.

On that note, I would like to make a few comments on this rapidly growing data center interconnect market and also the Metro market. We see the datacenter interconnect market segmented into long-haul and Metro. We see the very high capacity Metro portion of this data center interconnect market which we were calling Metro cloud as distinctly different from a more traditional Metro aggregation market driven by telcos and cable operators. We believe that large scale a 100 gig in the Metro will happen first in the Metro cloud market starting in earnest in early 2015. And that 100 gig in the Metro aggregation market will become interesting in late 2015 or early 2016, a view shared by many industry analysts.

Second, the migration of high capacity requirements into the Metro provides a new opportunity for us to use differentiated PIC technology to bring customers the experience they have grown the count on in the core. The overall Metro market is estimated to be over $7 billion by 2018 with the main growth driver being 100-gig according to Dell’Oro. This high-capacity 100-gig segment, which we plan on addressing, represents a significant opportunity for expansion. Third, the emerging high-capacity metro and long-haul cloud market is an opportunity we believe will be best served with high-capacity PIC-based solutions. While this category is currently tracked as part of the overall DWDM market, we believe that this market will grow extremely quickly and may add to the overall TAM of the DWDM market.

Chris I believe, don’t hold me to this, that they said the long haul portion was around 5 billion. I work at the Metro level and we just started putting in 100 gig pipes. That is only going to grow. I am sure if Infinera gets a Metro product that we will have it in our network. Here is a little more color from that last Infinera CC.

Simona Jankowski - Goldman Sachs
Sure, sure. Appreciate that. And just one last question on the timing of the Metro opportunity which I think before you had kind of talked about the real volume in the industry which is typically what you look to intercept happening more towards the end of 2015, but now you kind of broke that opportunity up into two parts kind of the aggregation piece and the cloud piece and it sounds like the cloud piece you think will be taking off in early ’15, so is that a little bit of change in the timing of when you think you will be intercepting that opportunity?

Tom Fallon - Chief Executive Officer
We are going to try to always intercept opportunities as the opportunity becomes interesting which is with volume. And you can anticipate we are going go hard after both the cloud interconnect market and the more long-haul market or aggregation market. And Simona, I am in hold off on giving any more details because I am excited about people coming to visit us in September to get a deep drive on what we are doing.

And this.

any impact, it’s just – it may impact the timing and size of future deals.

Alex Henderson - Needham
Okay. Going back to the metro side of it for a second, Sienna made the comment that 20% of their sales of coherent went into the metro last quarter. Would you characterize the market currently as straight cloud interconnect within that context of the granularity that you gave earlier? It seems like the coherent market is seeing some move into metro, but it’s not clear from what’s been said whether you would – which category that would fit into?

Brad Feller - Chief Financial Officer
Yes, there as Dave Welch - we have started before we do supply some of our products in the high capacity metro or even metro regional markets. The application of that is high-capacity aggregation rings and/or high-capacity datacenter connections to that. That is – if you look at the historical numbers of the growth rate and total unit volume that we expect out of the Metro market it is insignificant to the opportunity that’s out there. So currently we supply with the exclusion of China we supply – are the largest supplier of 100 gig technologies out there. And we expect to the Metro market to turn on as Tom indicated from volume perspective from the data center connections start turning on more so in ‘15. And the aggregation rings late ’15, beginning of ‘16. You will see applications within that, prior to those dates but from a volume perspective I don’t think they will really be that accelerating until those timeframes.

Tom Fallon - Chief Executive Officer
One of the things I’m asking I think about Alex is we certainly understand that today, there are some 100 gig coherent being deployed in the Metro. I pick the word interesting for the volume of it carefully. If you look back on the long-haul market, the initial 100 big coherent entered the market in 2010, the market became interesting 2012, 2013 timeframe. That’s when the bulk of the decisions were made, that’s when the bulk of the dollars started to ramp, it’s when market share was earned. And it’s the path we followed with the DTN-X and I think has served us quite well. So when we say that 100 gig in the Metro because interesting in 2015 late ’15, ‘16, you should kind of map into that kind of model.

Thanks to seekingalpha I was able to get these from Infinera’s last CC.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/2335955-infineras-infn-ceo-t…

Chris,
I think it is helpful to read Infinera’s CC because they do give some great insight to what is going on. At the Metro end we are already running 1 gig into people’s homes on fiber so we are ahead of much of the country, not counting Verizon. But this is the wave of the future and all everything needs to be changed out from copper to fiber. This is going to take awhile and some copper plant may not ever get changed out but I was talking to a technician for a small telco company in Utah and he said his companies ten year plan was to have every customer on fiber by the end of 10 years. This makes me think that all broadband suppliers will be going this route.

When you and Saul first started talking about AFOP I was not interested because it really is a commodity player with some big companies. But when I started looking at the numbers how could you argue with that.But I agree that if they can not keep growing then they are losing market share and I will be out.

Regarding your opinion of metro (as opposed to long haul) buildout, how big do you think this opportunity is and how long do you think the build out will continue?

Chris I think Fallon is very conservative so when he said the Metro was 7 billion I am thinking it is twice that. There is alot of data kept at the Metro level especially with all of the companies like Netflix and Amazon Prime. Companies are storing those video’s at the Metro level. As far as the buildout, I am not sure, but at the Metro level it is just at the very beginning stages. I would say at the Transport stage we are at the beginning of the middle stage.

And what are the risks associated?

I see the biggest risk is that other companies start taking Afop’s market from them, They make what I would consider the nuts and bolts of the Fiber optic world. Not the real high tech portion but a necessary part of it. Another risk is that they do not keep bringing more products to the market place. There are alot of avenues of growth they can take because they do have the capabilities to expand. They could be making FOT’s and competing with Corning and SFP’s(small form pluggable’s) to compete with Champion to name a few. Also they are already into the fiber jumper or patch cord’s which alone can help them grow. Those are used extensively in the industry.

And do AFOP’s current product mix address this opportunity

Personally I think their product mix will work out good for data centers and broadband central offices. But they have the ability to grow from there into the enterprise network. I would like to see them branch out even though the Data center growth right now is impressive.

I hope this helps some Chris. This is my view point and I just started looking at Afop so I may not have a real clear picture of them yet. I have opened a position on them though.

Andy
Long Afop

4 Likes

I hope this helps some Chris. This is my view point and I just started looking at Afop so I may not have a real clear picture of them yet. I have opened a position on them though.

Thanks, Andy. This was extremely helpful. I’d love to hear your additional thoughts after you’ve had a chance to look at AFOP more.

Chris

Myke,

Where is Saul?
Do u know?
Hope his health is OK.

R

Fantastic post Andy. Thank you for your professional insight and that of INFN.

Eric

I know others don’t agree, but I still think a good chunk of the AEYE run-up was due to demand from readers of the board – probably coupled with momentum traders. This is a tiny company and, as we’ve all filled out our initial positions, there’s been less demand for shares and so the price has fallen. Anyway, that’s my view of things. :wink:

Hi Neil,
I still think it was the pre announcement. The price had run up 70% right after the announcement and then settled back a little, before I even heard anything about it. The volume was at least a million and a half shares at least for days in a row. This board couldn’t do that. Besides we’re not the only ones who have heard of this company. All their customers and clients and everyone who works for these clients, for instance. Also, once they pre-announced the information became public knowledge and not insider trading and the principals could call all their friends and relatives and say “Hey, we’re tripling earnings and we’re going to be profitable”. Just thinking out loud.

Saul

For FAQ’s and Knowledgebase
please go to Post #2319

3 Likes

Since this is a thread for AFOP thoughts, I’m feeling more ambivalent about my AFOP position because of the flat three quarters (although I’m sure that they are underestimating next quarter this time, having learned their lesson last quarter), and because this is not a company that does something special, just a company that makes a commodity product well, and has been riding a wave (which, as has been pointed out, it may continue to do). But the price is way down, so there’s my ambivalence talking.

Saul

For FAQ’s and Knowledgebase
please go to Post #2319

2 Likes

SYNA ER this afternoon, should find out about this lost cutomer.

1 Like

I’m feeling more ambivalent about my AFOP position because of the flat three quarters (although I’m sure that they are underestimating next quarter this time, having learned their lesson last quarter), and because this is not a company that does something special, just a company that makes a commodity product well, and has been riding a wave (which, as has been pointed out, it may continue to do). But the price is way down, so there’s my ambivalence talking.

Saul,

When you say ambivalent, does that mean you are looking for other options for that portion of your portfolio, or just that you are not adding though they are down? What are your thoughts on PFIE also? I am surprised they are still falling. It seemed like their ER was pretty good. I’m asking because I have some money right now and was thinking they might be good since their price is down. I don’t know though, I am also looking at BOFI. I have a good portion of SYNA and UBNT already. CELG I don’t know enough about. AEYE seems a little small for me to look at right now.

Thanks for always sharing your ideas.
tdonb

When you say ambivalent, does that mean you are looking for other options for that portion of your portfolio

Hi, tdonb, I guess I’d be looking for alternatives that I was not ambivalent about.

Saul