Time for questions is more than underwhelming. Greg is terrible. Ajit sharp and direct. Charlie hilarious
Warren seems to ramble a bit. But hell @ 91 dude is sharp as a tack.
1 Like
I wouldn’t characterize Greg as terrible from the limited time he spoke. I do think he came across as more guarded than Jain, and not wanting to convey too much information for some reason. The default to corporate mumbo-jumbo was definitely disappointing on the first answer, but he did a bit better on the cyber answer, but still no real specifics.
2 Likes
" but he did a bit better on the cyber answer, but still no real specifics."
The cyber answer was still soft as well. Not as bad as the first stumble but it didn’t inspire confidence. I take no pleasure in pointing out his weakness. Contrasted against Ajit - the weakness is stark.
3 Likes