Last year, J&J fobbed it’s talc liabilities off on a spin-off that was set up to fail. Their strategy uses a Texas state law, even though neither J&J, nor the spin-off, is domiciled in Texas.
I forgot, until this morning, to check on the progress of J&J’s clear abuse of the bankruptcy law.
J&J won in court.
February 25, 2022
Johnson & Johnson wins a key court battle in baby powder case
A federal judge has allowed a company spun off by Johnson & Johnson to proceed with a controversial bankruptcy, despite complaints from thousands of people who say they were harmed by the consumer product giant’s baby powder and who could now be denied a chance to sue.
“The Court is aware that its decision today will be met with much angst and concern,” Kaplan wrote in his decision. “The Court remains steadfast in its belief that justice will best be served by expeditiously providing critical compensation through a court-supervised, fair, and less costly settlement trust arrangement.”
https://www.npr.org/2022/02/25/1083061992/johnson-johnson-wi…
Some weeks ago, 3M announced it will spin off a subsidiary, which will probably be stuck with it’s ear plug liability, with the sole purpose of stiffing claimants.
As the J&J case is in Federal court, I’m reasonably confident this SCOTUS would never, ever, “burden” any “JCs” with liability.
Steve