Bernanke tells Powell to raise rates

Benjamin Bernanke was Chairman of the Federal Reserve during and after the 2008 financial crisis. Under his watch, the Fed cut the Fed funds rate, invented Quantitative Easing and loosened monetary policy as never before, preventing the collapse of the financial markets. The Fed pumps money into the banks and the banks didn’t lend much to consumers during the Great Recession. Congress did not increase fiscal stimulus so consumer price inflation remained low.

Mr. Bernanke has written an article that compares and contrasts the inflation of the 1970s with today’s inflation. He describes how Federal Reserve chairmen caved to political pressure to keep monetary policy loose. Bernanke tactfully didn’t mention that Fed Chair Jerome Powell himself caved to political pressure to reverse the Fed’s program of raising the ultra-low fed funds rate in 2018.

Today, Bernanke is telling Powell to raise rates in order to establish and maintain the Fed’s credibility as an inflation fighter.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/14/opinion/inflation-stagfla…

**Inflation Isn’t Going to Bring Back the 1970s**
**By Ben S. Bernanke, The New York Times, June 14, 2022**

**....<huge snip describing Fed policy in the 1970s with high inflation and 4 recessions>...**

**Are we in danger of repeating that experience?**

**The short answer: almost certainly not....**

**Besides the Fed’s greater independence, a key difference from the ’60s and ’70s is that the Fed’s views on both the sources of inflation and its own responsibility to control the pace of price increases have changed markedly. ...**

**The Fed today recognizes that it must take the leading role in controlling inflation, and it has the tools and sufficient political independence to do so. After a delay caused by a misdiagnosis of the economy in 2021, the Fed has accordingly turned to tightening monetary policy, ending its pandemic-era bond purchases, announcing plans to shrink its securities holdings and raising short-term interest rates....**

**None of this implies that the Fed’s job will be easy. The degree to which the central bank will have to tighten monetary policy to control our currently high inflation, and the associated risk of an economic slowdown or recession, depends on several factors: how quickly the supply-side problems (high oil prices, supply-chain snarls) subside, how aggregate spending reacts to the tighter financial conditions engineered by the Fed and whether the Fed retains its credibility as an inflation fighter even if inflation takes a while to subside.... The Fed’s credibility will help ensure that the Great Inflation will not be repeated, and Mr. Powell and his colleagues will put a high priority on keeping that credibility intact.** [end quote]

In plain English, Bernanke is telling Powell, “The Fed’s credibility is the most important thing. If the Fed loses its cred, inflation will worsen. Raise rates and hang on. Inflation will take a long time to subside but you must not waver.”

In plain English, Bernanke is telling investors, “Taming inflation will be a marathon, not a sprint. Prepare for higher interest rates that will last a long time.”

Wendy

7 Likes

Somehow i dont put much stock in recommendations from Ben Bernanke.

He did engineer the greatest economic meltdown since the Great Depression.

A real expert on use of recession to counter excesses in the economy.

Not what we need.

1 Like

<Somehow i dont put much stock in recommendations from Ben Bernanke.

He did engineer the greatest economic meltdown since the Great Depression.>

While I agree with you, the two subsequent Fed Chairs, Janet Yellen and Jerome Powell, continued his policies. I think that Bernanke’s opinion will have a lot of weight with Powell.

Wendy

Somehow i dont put much stock in recommendations from Ben Bernanke.

He did engineer the greatest economic meltdown since the Great Depression.

Actually, Bernanke saved us from a depression in 2008-2012. He pleaded with Congress to provide more fiscal stimulus to the economy (the most cost efficient way to prop up the economy.) But when Congress failed, he was forced to use the blunt instrument of interest rate cuts, followed by quantitative easing – basically “trickle-down” through the banks, with little getting to those who needed it.

Bernanke did his MIT PhD dissertation on the policy failures during the Great Depression. We were lucky to have someone heading the Federal Reserve at the time wise enough to avoid Herbert Hoover’s failures.

intercst

18 Likes

I agree fully with what intercst wrote.

Through political polarization, stupidity, and corruption the USA Congress has lost sane consistent counter-cyclical fiscal policymaking Monetary policymaking is a far more blunt and slow operating instrument.

Its as if we were trying to chew with our lower jaw paralyzed.

david fb

8 Likes

Bernanke’s counter cyclical economics is not working.

The inflation bout the globe has is lead by demand particularly in the US were taxes on the very top earners are too low. Bernanke thought he was warding off something like Truman’s top tax bracket rate of 90%. We do not to go anything near that extreme. But we must cut off inflation through taxation.

1 Like

I’d much rather get advice from Alan Greenspan. He was much better for investors.

Bernanke probably could have achieved his goals with a 5% cut in the economy. He chose a 20% cut to punish the banks (as recommended by talking heads). Wow, did he succeed. In spades. But with lots of pain. Not what we need now!!!

Greenspan/Clinton et al handed off loose lending policies without oversight to Bernanke.

The idea of all that lending was to paper over a great depression. It was only a great depression if you were out of luck.

1 Like

<Bernanke probably could have achieved his goals with a 5% cut in the economy. He chose a 20% cut to punish the banks (as recommended by talking heads).>

I don’t understand what you mean by this. Please share the data that you are basing this comment on.

Ben Bernanke served as the 14th chair of the Federal Reserve from 2006 to 2014. By the time that Bernanke became chair, the housing bubble was already well underway. The Fed had not regulated bank lenders who were securitizing sub-prime mortgages and CDOs. The Fed did not have the authority to regulate non-bank mortgage lenders.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CSUSHPINSA

The bubble was largely caused by the extremely low fed funds rate which was put in place by Fed Chair Alan Greenspan. There was no reason to keep the fed funds rate at 1% after the end of the mild 2001 recession that was coincided the bursting of the tech stock bubble. After 2004, the Greenspan Fed raised the fed funds rate to 5.25%, which was the historical norm of about 2% over the inflation rate. The increase from 1% to 5.25% between May 2004 and September 2006 popped the housing bubble and caused huge losses in debt products. By July 2007 the economy was slowing, unemployment was rising and a recession was starting. By this time, Bernanke was Fed chair and rapidly cut the fed funds rate.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FEDFUNDS

I agree with you that Bernanke could probably have done more in 2006 but by that time the crisis was already baked in the cake. After the 2008 financial crisis, Bernanke pulled out all the stops to provide liquidity and prevent collapse of major financial firms that could have crashed the whole system. Bernanke did NOT punish the banks. Rather, he provided massive loans (Quantitative Easing) which the Fed had never done before.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/benbernanke.asp

The very long “Great Recession” was exacerbated by the failure of Congress to provide fiscal support. The monetary support from the Fed saved the banks, but the banks did not loan much to consumers. That wasn’t Bernanke’s fault.

Wendy

9 Likes

The no doc loans were out there and that had to be resolved. Sold in traunches and rated aaa by rating agencies on the theory that a real estate downturn wss likely to be regional.

Theres a famous CNBC video where Jim Cramer and the girl in the giraff dress beg for an interest rate cut. That is what Alan Greenspan would have done. They were right. Much turmoil could have been avoided.

In plain English, Bernanke is telling investors, “Taming inflation will be a marathon, not a sprint. Prepare for higher interest rates that will last a long time.”

The market (the aggregate of all people who trade bonds out there) don’t seem to agree. Recently I’ve noticed that all TIPS are now positive yield. So you can roughly see what expected inflation is by subtracting the yields of each maturity.

         Treasury  TIPS    Expected inflation
 5 year: 3.286     0.467   2.82%
10 year: 3.195     0.627   2.57%
30 year: 3.243     0.827   2.42%

So “the market” expects average inflation for 5 years to be 2.82%, and then expect it to abate a bit for the next 5 years to result in a 10 year average of 2.57%, and then over 30 years to average 2.42% (obviously 30 years is a LONG time, so those numbers can and will move around a lot over time).

2.82% average of 5 years is VERY LOW, I don’t even see how it is possible. We may be about to see 20% over 3 years (8 + 7 + 5). Doesn’t that mean that they are expecting deflation to get to that 2.82% 5 year average? Or am I looking at this the wrong way? (wouldn’t be the first time!)

But if this is a proper way of looking at it, is there any reasonable trade that can be done to make money from this disparity? Like short 5-year treasuries to buy 5-year TIPS? Or maybe some sort of complex futures combination trade?

3 Likes

Bernanke probably could have achieved his goals with a 5% cut in the economy. He chose a 20% cut to punish the banks (as recommended by talking heads). Wow, did he succeed. In spades. But with lots of pain. Not what we need now!!!

The peak to trough GDP drop in the 2009 recession was 4.3%. What exactly are you referring to here with the 20% figure?

https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/great-recession…

2 Likes

Bernanke probably could have achieved his goals with a 5% cut in the economy. He chose a 20% cut to punish the banks (as recommended by talking heads). Wow, did he succeed. In spades. But with lots of pain. Not what we need now!!!

Down with financial dictatorship! We need BOIDS!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqtqltqcQhw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbUPfMXXQIY

Boids

https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q…

The Captain

1 Like