Beware of ChatGPT!

I have started to use ChatGPT regularly. It’s really powerful. I asked it to find me a dishwasher without a filter in the bottom that had good ratings for reliability and it sorted through dozens of models to find a Maytag.

I asked ChatGPT this question today:
What will a $1,000 I-series Savings bond bought in September 2001 be worth at maturity if inflation is 2%?

The answer:
To estimate the value of a $1,000 I-series Savings Bond bought in September 2001 at maturity with an average inflation rate of 2%, let’s break it down:


:receipt: Key Facts about I Bonds:

  1. I Bonds earn interest monthly, compounded semiannually.
  2. The interest rate is a combination of:
  • A fixed rate (set at purchase and never changes).
  • A variable rate (adjusted every 6 months based on inflation).
  1. Maturity: I Bonds earn interest for up to 30 years.
  2. Tax: You only pay federal taxes on interest when you cash out.

:bullseye: Goal:

Estimate the value of the bond at maturity in 2031 (30 years from 2001), assuming:

  • $1,000 face value
  • 2% annual inflation
  • Fixed rate is 3.00% (which is the actual fixed rate for I Bonds issued in September 2001)

:abacus: Formula:

The I Bond’s annual composite rate is calculated as:

Composite Rate=Fixed Rate+(2×Inflation Rate)+(Fixed Rate×Inflation Rate)\text{Composite Rate} = \text{Fixed Rate} + (2 \times \text{Inflation Rate}) + (\text{Fixed Rate} \times \text{Inflation Rate})Composite Rate=Fixed Rate+(2×Inflation Rate)+(Fixed Rate×Inflation Rate)

With:

  • Fixed Rate = 3.00% (0.03)
  • Inflation Rate = 2.00% (0.02)

=0.03+(2×0.02)+(0.03×0.02)=0.03+0.04+0.0006=0.0706 or 7.06%= 0.03 + (2 \times 0.02) + (0.03 \times 0.02) \ = 0.03 + 0.04 + 0.0006 = 0.0706 \text{ or } 7.06%=0.03+(2×0.02)+(0.03×0.02)=0.03+0.04+0.0006=0.0706 or 7.06%

So, the bond would earn 7.06% annual interest compounded semiannually.

This seemed very high to me so I cross-checked with Treasury Direct.

I bonds earn a combined rate of interest

the interest on I bonds is a combination of

a fixed rate
a inflation rate

The fixed rate is an annual rate.

The inflation rate changes every 6 months.

We set the inflation rate every May 1 and November 1. We base the inflation rate on changes in the non-seasonally adjusted Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for all items, including food and energy.

The actual rate of interest for an I bond is calculated from the fixed rate and the inflation rate. The combined rate changes every 6 months. It can go up or down.

The composite rate for I bonds issued from November 2024 through April 2025 is 3.11%.

Here’s how we got that rate:

Fixed rate 1.20%
Semiannual (1/2 year) inflation rate 0.95%
Composite rate formula: [Fixed rate + (2 x semiannual inflation rate) + (fixed rate x semiannual inflation rate)] [0.0120 + (2 x 0.0095) + (0.0120 x .0095)]
Gives a composite rate of [0.0120 + 0.0190 + 0.0001140]
Adding the parts gives 0.031114
Rounding gives 0.0311
Turning the decimal number to a percentage gives a composite rate of 3.11%

[end quote]

The ChatGPT equation is wrong because it uses a whole year inflation rate in the equation instead of a semi-annual inflation rate. This gives an interest rate that is too high. Their calculations of interest and bond value were so much higher than mine that I was startled. That’s why I double-checked it.

Beware of ChatGPT. It’s very confident but the answer may be wrong.

I don’t know how to correct it. I would still like to see the calculations…as long as they are correct.

Wendy

8 Likes

I’d say beware of i-bonds. My 2%, 28-yr-old allocation to i-bonds is the poorest performer in my portfolio over the past 30 years.

The i-bonds have roughly tripled in price over a period where the long-term buy & hold investor in the S&P 500 has seen his money grow about 20-fold (with dividends reinvested)

Yikes!

intercst

5 Likes

I assume you’re using the free version, but in any case, did you ask a follow-up question indicating “this answer is incorrect since you used a whole year inflation rate in the equation instead of a semi-annual inflation rate. Please recalculate using the semi-annual inflation rate.”

This kind of follow-up has often yielded me better (or maybe correct in your case) results.

Pete

6 Likes

Twin lizard to our POTUS?

3 Likes

I know quite a few people like that - often wrong, but never in doubt :wink:

It happened to me as well. I asked it which year in the 16th century was the shortest. It didn’t consider the switch between calendar systems in 1582. But when I responded pointing that out, it came back with ‚Yes you are correct!‘ and retraced the initial output, even pointing out differences by country. It may work in your case too.

4 Likes

I second this suggestion. If you tell it where its error is, it will fix it (usually).
But the point remains…at least for now it is a good assistant for things like this, not a replacement of an actual expert. Yet.

Mike

1 Like

One description that stuck with me is that these LLM AIs are very good at being fairly mediocre at white collar jobs. They can be useful in preparing a first draft of a writing or analysis, but they’re not anywhere near competent enough that you can trust them to prepare a final product.

And they might not be for quite some time…

3 Likes

I have yet to read an AI generated text of any substance that I would accept as written. AI’s, imitating the great mob of illiterates it has as its mentor, writes in cliches, mistaken notions, and botches.

4 Likes

Oh, it’s sometimes WAY worse than just low quality. Sometimes it’s just plain old fake, made up information.

3 Likes