Cleaning up the cruise industry

Seeing the world as a passenger aboard a cruise ship currently represents only 2 percent of the global tourism industry. But cruising is growing in popularity, and to meet demand and compete for patrons, cruise ship lines are building larger, more luxurious ships that offer endless prepared food, air-conditioned cabins; huge swimming pools, and other amenities that require a lot of energy to produce.

Today, more than 300 ships transverse the globe every day, and the number of passengers is forecast to reach almost 40 million by 2027. With so many people traveling through the oceans and seas, disembarking to crowded shorelines, and tripling their personal carbon footprint while on the trip, it’s no wonder that environmentalists are worried

According to Popular Science, each floating hotel can burn up to 250 tons of fuel a day. Because of the nature of the ship—providing fuel-intense passenger “comforts”—they are the worst in an industry that already accounts for 2.9 percent of global carbon dioxide emissions. The largest cruise ship to date personifies the situation. The Royal Caribbean’s Icon of the Seas, launched in January, features 20 decks, six water slides, and the largest swimming pool at sea. With a length of nearly 2,000 feet, it weighs 250,800 GTs and can accommodate up to 7,600 passengers.

But while the mainstream may be moving to bigger as better, some investors are looking to bring a totally green perspective to cruising. The Hurtigruten Group, for example, is working with its partners on a net-zero ship called SeaZero. This 443-foot-long ship for 600 guests and crew uses solar, AI, and 60 MWh batteries that display their charge levels on the external sides of the ship.

Still, many within the cruising industry are responding to increased criticism and are embracing sustainability tactics. Almost every cruise line is investing in some green initiatives, Colleen McDaniel, editor-in-chief of Cruise Critic, told CNN. And the industry’s trade group, Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), has members committed to netzero carbon emissions by 2050.

In its latest report, “Environmental Technologies and Practice, CLIA Global Oceangoing Cruise Lines,” CLIA reported that of the 44 new ships that members have been investing in since 2019, 25 will be liquified natural gas (LNG)-powered and seven will be either methanol-ready on delivery or methanol capable. “LNG has virtually zero sulfur emissions and particulate emissions, reduces NOx emissions by approximately 85 percent, and achieves up to a 20 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions,” CLIA reported.

Cruise lines are also studying alternative fuel sources looking to run on renewable fuels, including biofuels and synthetic carbon fuels. Currently, four ships use renewable biofuel as an energy source. And an additional four new builds are expected to be configured for renewable biofuels, CLIA reported. Finally, 24 ships are trialing biofuel and two looking at synthetic carbon fuel.

3 Likes

No. Here’s how you do it:

3 Likes

That is an entirely different class of ocean vacation when compared to typical cruise ships. Even small ship river cruises are quite different than typical cruise ships.

Yeah I know. We did a short cruise from Seattle to Alaska on a monster. We did a small boat cruise up the Nile which would have been great if we hadn’t all gotten sick. I got to go first!

Prolly not going to do the schooner thing but I thought it interesting enough to share in view of the topic.

4 Likes

Ship propulsion is only part of it. You need a ton of electricity to power the casinos, and kitchens, and shows, that suck money out of the passenger’s pockets.

Steve

1 Like

I took my Dad on a two week sailing trip off the coast of Maine, on the schooner American Eagle. What a great trip! It was our last great adventure before he slipped into dementia and off to the great beyond.

3 Likes

I’m glad I got all my cruising done in 2008-2012 when the Bush mortgage meltdown left people afraid to spend and everything got really cheap.

They’re no longer letting the big cruise ships into Antarctica, Venice, Italy, or some of the Norwegian fjords.

Eventually it will be limited to Florida and Texas – yee haw {{ LOL }}

intercst

1 Like

I have no interest in crusing, but that sounds lovely. I can imagine myself watching the sailors set and trim the sails all day long, but I can also imagine myself at the rails puking my guts out all day long.

Speaking of cleaning up the maritime atmosphere…

Abrupt reduction in shipping emission as an inadvertent geoengineering termination shock produces substantial radiative warming
Yuan et al.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01442-3
Abstract:
The warming effect of anthropogenic greenhouse gases has been partially balanced by the cooling effect of anthropogenic aerosols. In 2020, fuel regulations abruptly reduced the emission of sulfur dioxide from international shipping by about 80% and created an inadvertent geoengineering termination shock with global impact. Here we estimate the regulation leads to a radiative forcing of Wm−2 averaged over the global ocean. The amount of radiative forcing could lead to a doubling (or more) of the warming rate in the 2020s compared with the rate since 1980 with strong spatiotemporal heterogeneity. The warming effect is consistent with the recent observed strong warming in 2023 and expected to make the 2020 s anomalously warm. The forcing is equivalent in magnitude to 80% of the measured increase in planetary heat uptake since 2020. The radiative forcing also has strong hemispheric contrast, which has important implications for precipitation pattern changes. Our result suggests marine cloud brightening may be a viable geoengineering method in temporarily cooling the climate that has its unique challenges due to inherent spatiotemporal heterogeneity.

DB2

1 Like

Nothing new here. We already know that sulfer dioxide reduces radiative warming. But we surely do not want coal burning.

I didn’t know they still had coal-burning ships.

DB2

Elected leaders in Alameda, Calif., voted early on Wednesday to stop scientists from testing a device that might one day be used to artificially cool the planet, overruling city staff members who had found the experiment posed no danger.

Despite assurances from experts that the experiment was safe for humans and the environment, residents in the small city of 76,000 voiced the kinds of fears that swirl around the idea of intervening with natural systems to temporarily ease global warming.

The test involved spraying tiny sea-salt particles across the flight deck of a decommissioned aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Hornet, docked in Alameda in San Francisco Bay. Versions of that device could eventually be used to spray the material skyward, making clouds brighter so that they reflect more sunlight away from Earth. Scientists say that could help to cool the planet and to fight the effects of global warming.

1 Like