Dividends Don't Matter........Do They?

On NEP.

What is a NEP?

NEP is NextEra Energy Partners:

Quick Peek:

NextEra Energy Partners, LP acquires, owns, and manages contracted clean energy projects in the United States. It owns a portfolio of contracted renewable generation assets consisting of wind, solar, and battery storage projects. The company owns contracted natural gas pipeline assets.

In short: its in cahoots with its parent company NEE in the Renewable Energy scam; although, in its recent ER it performed well. Here are comments on that from Income Method Guru Rida Morwa:

NextEra Energy Partners: Doing What They Said They Would Do

"The market remains skeptical, while NextEra Energy Partners keeps doing exactly what they said they would do. NEP’s share price fell off a cliff in late 2023 when management revoked prior guidance and reset growth expectations. Prior guidance was for NEP to grow its distributions at a pace of 12-15%. The revised guidance is for distribution growth to be 5-8%, with a target of 6% expected through 2026.

Clearly, a company with 12-15% growth should trade at a higher price than one with 6% growth. Yet the market has responded with a much more aggressive sell-off than that difference would justify. Clearly, the market is skeptical that NEP management will be able to hit the new lower target.

Yet NEP is hitting its target, with another distribution increase to $0.905/quarter. Management reaffirmed its target to increase that to $0.9325/quarter for the February 2025 distribution. "

We own NEP in the Income Port - and will continue to own NEP; as long as it keeps hitting its Distribution increase targets. NEP currently pays a 13.90% distribution quarterly and a YOC distribution of 18.40%.

Scouting Report by Mr Morwa:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4702044-i-am-buying-the-dip-for-this-14-percent-yield-nextera-energy-partners#source=section%3Asummary|section_asset%3Aall_analysis|first_level_url%3Asymbol|button%3ATitle|lock_status%3ANo|line%3A1

All the Best,

4 Likes

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund

MSDL

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund is a business development company. The fund chiefly invests in riskier bonds, issued by middle-market companies or by private equity firms looking to finance their acquisitions.

Added MSDL to the Income Portfolio with a 1/2 position.

The company pays a $2.00 annual dividend in quarterly installments and at purchase price represents a yield of 9.73%.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4702380-morgan-stanley-direct-lending-compelling-10-percent-defensive-yield-msdl-stock#source=section%3Asummary|section_asset%3Aall_analysis|first_level_url%3Asymbol|button%3ATitle|lock_status%3ANo|line%3A1

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4689576-morgan-stanley-direct-lending-another-strong-buy#source=section%3Asummary|section_asset%3Aall_analysis|first_level_url%3Asymbol|button%3ATitle|lock_status%3ANo|line%3A4

Note: For BDC investments I subscribe to BDCBuzz. Has done very well for the family.

All the Best,

1 Like

This question has nothing to do with Morgan Stanley or other securities you’ve mentioned in this thread. It’s a question I forgot to ask earlier, or maybe I thought of it later. I’m still curious about how you think about this dividend strategy. Were you or your wife running a version of this high yield portfolio in the period 2008-2009? If so, what was your experience? Again, no agenda with this question, just curious how others think about and manage things.

Thanks,
El Supremo

Hi El Supremo:

“I’m still curious about how you think about this dividend strategy.”

I wish I had discovered the Income Method and its thinker upper Rida Morwa much sooner. As I mentioned previously - it’s an income flywheel whereby distributions and dividends are rolled back into additional shares or new dividend investments. Let me give you an example: from July 1st through today the account has been paid 40 dividends. It’s cash in the bank if I wanted to/needed to use it. But I don’t. So I am in the process of rolling over 100% of it into those positions that are at price points that interest me. If I have dividends left over from that process - I then hold them until I find something new to add to the portfolio. It’s a simple process that has been pretty much repeated every month for going on many years now. The income increases each and every month by a percentage equal to the reinvestments underlying yields and/or the yields of new positions.

Not sure that is the answer to the question you asked. The real answer I suppose is that I actually don’t think much about it at all. Just when I have the cash to re-invest from the distributions/dividends or when something might be called - or - when I trim the hedges/shrubs that are overgrown a bit. Sort of tidying up the landscape as it were.

But I still don’t think thats the answer that you desire. For that, I would urge you to take a stroll through HDO where their philosophy is outlined in simple terms. Because, at the end of the day, I follow their philosophy pretty dang close to its core; which I admit, was very strange and awkward to me at first. Having said that - despite the same criticisms you find in this thread that are often voiced online - I am dealing with results. Not theory. And the results have been simply superb.

To answer your second question we established this account in its current iteration sometime in 2015 - that without going back and getting an established date. My wife has been its caretaker off and on and has recently asked me to take it over again. Now I think I have seen the data on the HDO performance you are asking about and will try to go back and find it. Although, remembering that I scare easily - it didn’t seem too awfully frightful when I looked at the chart of it.

All the Best,

Hi Ears:

Ok I’ve done some of the work for you. Here is a link that should help you understand why our income port is build around the HDO strategy.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4701386-revolutionize-your-retirement-one-step-at-a-time

Take it out for a test drive and see what you think. We like it so much that we decided to dedicate an entire ROTH to it and build it to roughly match the value of our Growth Port. I liken it to the old golf saw: Drive for Show (Growth): Putt for Dough (Income). It’s an escape hatch if needed; a Safe Room - a parachute and/or - a life raft if the boat sinks. And it just sits there continuously growing.

All the Best,
BDH Investing

1 Like

Hey Champ,

It may not come as a surprise that strategies like HDO have been around for a very long time. Every so often they get repackaged with a twist as something new. For example, back in 2010-2014 there was a guy on the old TMF boards who had a version of this strategy. In fact, he wrote a book about it: https://www.amazon.com/Retirement-Investing-Income-ONLY-retirement/dp/1501072137/

I find it so interesting how you think about this, particularly in how you view this approach as a Safe Room. If Ralph Block were here, he’d say there’s no free lunch and just what is it you have to give up in order to get your spectacular result?

Regards,
Ears

2 Likes

El Supremo:

Now this is a dilemma.

Ralph sounds like he was a good guy and I wish I had the privilege of his thoughts. Luckily - I do have the honor of your thoughts; which I value a great deal. So…without any hints of subtlety - but with direct distinction - could you tell me what you think investors in the Income Method are paying for this lunch you keep referring to? Can you speak to what Ralph was actually saying while directly applying it to this investing regimen? I mean - please do not be oblique; but rather, direct in your criticism so that we may get to the meat of the matter. I have had a great deal of capital involved in the Income Port for a long, long time - about 9 years of this particular investing style - so…if something evil this way comes…if something diabolical is lurking in the wings about to pounce - the boogey man of income investing is real - then please lets face it directly.

All this I say with a smile on my face and with absence of intended conflict. I value your thoughts and input - I just want to know…to understand what they actually are referring to or what they are alluding to. Once plainly stated, I then can do my best to reply - not with theory or vague and veiled suggestions of investing danger; but rather, with the results from actual experience for comparison purposes.

Alll the Best.
BDH Investing

4 Likes

El Supremo:

Ok - went back and looked for a chart that displayed performance results for the HDO folks for 2008-2009. There are none because HDO was founded a bit later. But here is - and what I think I originally saw on the issue - an article that goes over what would have happened to the HDO portfolio during that time frame - and a similar event - using their holdings when the article was written way back in 2022:

Now - truth be told, I just don’t see any horror story here; just the market doing what the market does, but admittedly, I tend to look at things a little differently and maybe I am missing something. Moreover - I would urge anyone and everyone to read this article. Especially my growth brethren cohort.

Here are a few quotes from the article that may provide leverage for discussion of differing opinions:

"While “Value” stocks like we hold in the HDO Model Portfolio are still outperforming year-to-date, they are down nearly 18%. This is an amount that a lot of people get concerned about. Yet in the stock market’s history, this is not an abnormal event. Bear markets come around from time to time, and through your investing career, you will see several of them.

For the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq, this is the deepest bear market since the Great Financial Crisis. For Value stocks, it isn’t as bad as COVID was.

Today, I want to focus on dividends. Share prices will do what they do. Will the market recover next week? I don’t know, and frankly, I don’t care. The market will recover eventually. Until it does, I’ll focus on growing my income and buying dividends while they are on sale. As far as I’m concerned, prices can stay low for the next few years.

I’ve seen many comments asking about dividends in relation to the share price. Questions like “what use is a dividend if the price is down X%?”. Today I want to answer that question in-depth and include some backtesting analysis of the Income Method using Portfolio Visualizer.

I preach about focusing on income. Today, I want to pursue more deeply why I am such an evangelist about income investing and why swings in market prices really don’t faze me at all."

"At HDO, a large part of our due diligence is determining whether a company is outearning its dividend. We aren’t interested in high yields from companies that don’t have the earnings to support them. We look for companies that are covering their dividend and can reasonably be expected to cover their dividend from earnings.

In other words, we are looking for dividends that stem from profits earned by the company.“Sometimes, there will be “black swan” events that can put a normally safe dividend at risk. COVID was an example of that, as numerous companies saw their revenue plummet almost overnight. During that period, many dividends that could have been considered solid in late 2019 were cut. Yet black swans are called black swans because they are very rare.”

"The instability of prices and the relative stability of dividends is why I created The Income Method. Prices are temporary, they come and go. Often the price changes before I can even place my buy order! How rational is it to base your performance on something that changes every second that the market is open? "

"Forget “beating the market” – this isn’t a game for me. I’m not out to be like a star athlete, winning for the sake of winning. Whether someone out there makes more money than I do in the market does not impact my life. My goal isn’t to have “the most”. It is to have enough to support the lifestyle I choose to live. I can live perfectly fine knowing that I didn’t get the highest score in the market game. If I don’t have the cash I need to support the lifestyle I choose, now we are talking about something that impacts my quality of life.

When I think about it, there are a few facts to use as my base:

  • Prices change, and I can’t predict what they will be in the future with any significant precision.
  • My cash needs in retirement are not a single lump sum. I need recurring and preferably growing cash flow.
  • I can’t predict how long I will live with any significant precision.

I need cash flow, not some random sum of money. My goal is not to have $1 million, $5 million, or $10 million. Such a goal doesn’t even make sense because if I live to 75, the amount of money I need is very different than if I live to be 100.

Why would I set a goal at some random dollar amount? I don’t know how many dollars I will need. I don’t know if inflation will average 1%, 2%, or 5% over the next 30 years. I don’t know if I will live for 30 years. I could guess at these values, relying on historical averages and life expectancies. Maybe my guess will be close, but I don’t want my future to rely on a “guess”.

So instead of making my goal to have $X million in my portfolio, my goal is focused on my annual dividend stream. Even when the market is down, I can look at my income stream and see whether I am closer or further away from my goal. Often, I am closer to my goal even when share prices are down."

And now we get to the meat - an example of a HDO holding during the Great Financial Crisis and for Covid. Note: Plot Reveal Follows:

Consider one of HDO’s longest-held holdings, Ares Capital (ARCC). The top graph is the changes in price, with reinvestment of all dividends, and the bottom graph is the income. (Source: PortfolioVisualizer)

Note that the price declined over 80% during the Great Financial Crisis. It was relatively flat for many years and crashed 40% again during COVID. You likely panicked during those years if your goal was to get to a lump sum. In both cases, you lost about 5 years of progress in terms of portfolio value.

If your goal was income, from 2007 to 2009, your income increased 26%. Note that this increase occurred despite a 17% dividend cut in 2009. The reason for this is that reinvesting at lower prices drives future income upward.

In hindsight, there was no reason to panic about ARCC during the Great Financial Crisis, nor was there a reason to panic during COVID. In both cases, the price eventually fully recovered, but when ARCC went from $20 to under $5, many investors panicked. When it went from $19 to below $10 during COVID, they panicked again. After all, that was “6 years of dividends just to get even!”

Investors who focused on the income saw that being able to reinvest in ARCC at 30% yields was the bargain of a century. The price for ARCC has been all over the place, the income has steadily climbed.

By focusing on the income, investors got a clearer picture of how their investment was actually performing. By setting an income goal, as opposed to a value goal, investors can rely on a much more consistent measurement. Price varies wildly from year to year, while income doesn’t, even through very difficult times."

And now the final act:

After setting the table with all that - we get to the Bottom line: Man to Man combat - a sort of Grand Finale on performance results vs theory and ancillary opinion during the timeline in question. But you’ll have to read it - posting it here as a quote just won’t have the same impact as reading it. But if you want to save time - well, as Patton once said, “We’re gonna grab them by the nose and kick them in the a**”. Or…alternatively, as that great philosopher Shakira put it:

Evidently - neither hips nor performance results lie.

Lastly, If you do read this article - and I realize you are a busy man and your time is limited; but if you do/can take the time to read it - then perhaps we can get past the cryptic lunch thingy comment and focus on specifics within the strategy that you find quarrel with. That would be wonderfully valuable, respectfully appreciated, and overwhelmingly worth the price of admission to this subject.

All the Best,
BDH Investing

3 Likes

Hi Champ,

First, I have no agenda with my questions other than curiosity. No intent to criticize. In fact, I don’t have answers to the questions I asked you. Think of them as dumb questions from the slowest kid in class.

That said, here’s an observation. Ralph was a REIT insider but invested in other fixed income as well. When he said there’s no free lunch in investing, I think what he meant was you always have to give up something to get something in return. Given that investing is about managing risk, if you’re getting a spectacular yield then perhaps what you’re giving up has something to do with risk. That’s why I was so interested in your Safe Harbor view.

If you read Bruce Miller’s book published in 2014, he says all the same things as Rida Morwa. Both of them are passionate about income investing. Sounds like you are too. Bruce was more of a DIY guy when it came to due diligence, but it looks like you’ve wisely decided to outsource your due diligence to Rida Morwa and are in good hands.

I’ll admit a bias against people who like Bruce and Rida who seem to have all the answers and proclaim there actually is a free lunch. That’s probably what prompted me to ask my questions.

P.S., your 9 years comment made me think of Peter Lynch who once said that long-term investing these days is three weeks from next Wednesday. I’ll admit to another bias in that I think of investing as asymmetric, meaning what happened yesterday has little bearing on what will happen tomorrow.

Regards,
Ears

2 Likes

Hi Ears:

I thought it an honest and honorable conversation - a swapping of ideas, with someone I respect and always enjoy hearing from. In the end, as I mentioned way, way back at the top of this thread - in this particular tug-a-war, thrust and parry of ideas between Growth and Income investors seldom is either side much assuaged less convinced by the other. For me Its not unlike standing on a glacier that is splitting with a foot firmly on either side: I am a Growth investor first and foremost. Income investing interrupts that but years ago I made it an absolute necessity. Why?

The Income port was created for that exact reason - my wife left with ease of living when the good Lord decides he has had quite enough of me. And Safe Harbor? Why… Her first order of the day is: Immediately sell the Growth Port. Because - the Income port has grown to be several times greater than what is annually needed and again -Safe Harbor - being the status that if half the company’s in the port…fully half… went belly up, eliminated their dividends she would not be impacted one single bit. Not a single hair on her head would be economically distressed. Not even if the remainder cut their dividends in half. Well almost - not counting savings accounts, real estate and insurance benefits. All part of a family plan thunk up and through and built piece by piece over decades of work.

Having achieved that goal over almost a decade of compounding, I cannot imagine anything short of the total collapse of our system where such an event occur. And that is the life raft - the parachute I reasoned - for her. Nothing more - nothing less.

Personally I couldn’t care less about income investing: it’s boring, bland repetitious and totally without appeal. But it is the one reason - the sea wall against the storm, the dike against the dam breaching - holding back the flood which allows me to be as nonchalant and reckless in my Growth port as I am.

Simple as that.

All the Best,
BDH Investing

2 Likes

Champ-
I’ve enjoyed these posts regarding income investing and appreciate you taking the time and effort to publicly discuss your methods, resources, and philosophy. As we have previously discussed, My portfolio structure consists of ~85% income and ~15% growth, with my wife’s titled assets more conservatively positioned. I’m still actively trading the growth sleeve and managing the income sleeve in a manner similar to HDO, but plan to step back as I age in years and attention span.

Interestingly, I did read Bruce Miller’s book which led me to a DIY income portfolio. Instead of Rida, I use The REIT Forum and Diversified Income Streams (BDC Buzz contributes there ans well and Alpha Gen, who specialized in CEFs) for analysis, but my approach is definitely income oriented. I’ve read Ken Fischer’s stuff about liquidating for income and that doesn’t interest me that much.

On the growth side, I mainly use you, Dreamer, and Saul’s to generate ideas. While you were on sabbatical I had less DD than when you are active.

Thanks for this thread as I feel comaraderie.

Best, 5

5 Likes

I just want to remind everyone Nvda pays a dividend, don’t buy it for the growth, but it for the payout.

“I just want to remind everyone Nvda pays a dividend, don’t buy it for the growth, but it for the payout.”

Sigh - So right…and if only Luckin Coffee and Upstart had payed a dividend I might have been saved!

All the Best,

2 Likes

I will say this Champ Ralph Block’s book on Reits is very good. I am on the same wave length as you on dividends but My wife? Well, she loves dividends.

1 Like

The things we do for love!

Recently - one dinner a week or so ago, the All-Too-Lovely casually mentioned that she wanted me to create a “A wonderful Topiary along the east side of the driveway”. adding…“wouldn’t that just be lovely”. Why yes…truly lovely and give me a day or so and I’ll come up with a plan and perhaps a rendering for you. Subsequent to dinner I went straight to my office and looked up Topiary online…called my retired landscape General and told him we were putting in a Topiary. I wasn’t much assured when he asked: Whats a Topiary?

Now this is always how these things happen. A few years ago her and some of her club cronies decided we needed a Butterfly garden with a fountain and fancy benches to view them from. Done. Then a year or so later it was: Don’t you think it would be quite pleasant to have a bird house village? Said so casually which always means a lot of work for me.

So anyway…me and the general came up with what I thought was just a dandy Topiary plan - and so I presented it to her. She took a quick glance and asked where the animals were. What animals I stupidly asked ? Turns out she wants a Topiary comprised of a “relaxing walking path” decorated with large animals in some sort of flowing design. Got it - so back to the drawing board.

Turns out you can purchase large topiary forms of animals: so far I have found elephants, elk, dogs, cows, horses, bears, dolphins, giraffes and one giant dinosaur. ( The dogs peeing on the lawn is my favorite but I don’t think it has much of a chance.). And these things are relatively full size and really expensive and take some time to fully flesh out with I suppose English Ivy or something…maybe Mississippi Kudzu.

Note: I tried to talk her into just penning up some goats, maybe geese or swans or some ponies around the path but she acted like she had been gut shot so I dropped that idea.

The things we do for love.

All the Best,

4 Likes

That’s an example of “no free lunch” but one could get lucky and think he is smart…

Luckin Coffee had huge option premium, and I used to write large # of puts, scoring all those premium. Luckily before it went down, I saw the short seller report, and closed my position. I was picking pennies in front of road roller and escaped.

But I learned a lesson on that one without paying the price.

Some are lucky… me not so much. My wife loves jewelry preferably diamonds…

1 Like

My wife hates jewelry but loves ocean front property. I am thinking you win.

1 Like

As a curious observer of the world of investing, I’ve found this discussion fascinating. It stands conventional wisdom on its head.

Not that long ago, Warren Buffett advised investors not to reach for yield. He didn’t mince words, saying it was “really stupid”. He said “if you need to get 3% and can only get 1%, the answer is…you should always adapt your consumption to your income. People say 'Well, I saved all my life and I can only get 1%, what do I do? You learn to live on 1%, unfortunately. You don’t go and listen to some salesman come and tell you 'I’ve got you some magic way to get you 5%.”

I think Ralph Block was saying much the same thing with his no free lunch comment, but in a different way. That to get a higher yield means you take on more risk.

The 9-year track record of the Income port suggests that advice is no longer relevant. You can get high yield. You can do so with minimal effort. And with complete safety.

Thanks, Champ, for generously sharing your experience.

Ears

2 Likes

Hi Kingran:

In my investing history I have made a lot of really dumb decisions and have the various scars and psychological trauma from them. It didn’t take me too awfully long - maybe 8-10 years, to arrive at two related conclusions:

  1. I was not smart relative to investing.

  2. Finding and following people that were smart at investing was my only path to investing survival.

Ever since and forever more - I have tried very hard to remember the first conclusion and follow the second as closely as possible.

All the Best,

4 Likes