CFP outlines the additional tax and health costs of working past age 60.
He doesn’t mention it, but if you’re a max-FICA wage earner from your mid to late 20’s, you’ll reach the 2nd bend point of the AIME calculation by age 45 or so. There you’ll get 77% of the maximum monthly Social Security check, while paying about 1/2 the lifetime FICA taxes.
Not sure I buy all of his reasoning. The social connection, the routine, the sense of purpose/identity, etc… can all be beneficial to mental and physical health for working beyond age 60. The brain challenge can be well worth it as well.
I don’t know. I’ve been retired for 30+ years. Quit my job as an engineer in the oil & gas industry way back in 1994 at age 38 once I’d accumulated enough capital to live off the 4% rule. I wake up every day and just do whatever happens to 100% interest me at the time. I’m pretty sure the decision has greatly improved my longevity.
Back when I was working, I usually had 5 or 6 things I’d rather be doing than sitting in an office (even if two of them was to “get more sleep” and “watch more TV”.)
I’d have difficulty completing a time sheet to account for the past 30 years, other than to say it’s been completely awesome.
I agree that it is good for a person to remain engaged in something. Keep the mind busy. But it doesn’t necessarily have to be work. It could be travel (which ticks most of the points mentioned, e.g. social connections, physical/mental, etc). Volunteering for something important to you.
Stress and unhappiness work against physical, and especially mental, health.
Taylor’s focus in the video on “life in your 60’s” being filled with “grandchildren, travel, and hiking in state parks” as his premise or theme of why one would not want to work too long because you might have regrets later on just seemed odd to us. We travel, hike, bike, ski, socialize, etc.. in our 60’s. (have no grandchildren as of yet) all while being employed - at least for the first half of our 60’s.
Agree that financially, the additional accumulation doesn’t move the needle much. On the other hand, filling the gap years that includes health insurance, not relying on the portfolio, still enjoying work, getting plenty of travel/hiking/biking/socializing in while working in our early to mid 60’s doesn’t seem to be something we are going to have regrets over a few years from now when we look back on it all.
There are plenty of articles, books, opinions, blogs, etc. out there that focus on the opposite side of the discussion that Taylor is presenting.
I think the issue is that for the vast majority of Americans who get a small finite amount of time away from work (that they don’t necessarily get to determine when it happens), doing any of the above can only come in snippets and not as a major lifestyle. Many of those activities are limited based on geographic location so it can be difficult to do them while still being employed full time.
I think of my inlaws, retired teachers, who now travel 4-5x as much as they did when they were employed and most of that travel is now during times where it simply was not possible to travel (school year).
I am married to a teacher so I face the same travel restrictions. We would love to go whale watching (and dive with whale sharks) but we cannot travel during the time of the year when either are most likely to be seen.
Admit that our careers (opera singer and later college professor while wife was on the academic calendar) involved plenty of time off for at least 30+ years (summers, semester breaks, spring breaks, etc.), so our life was very front end loaded with travel. Plus my singing career involved a lot of travel, both domestic and international. We still average about two large trips per year (one international, one domestic), but the travel bug is certainly no longer our “itch” any more. I admit it sure is for others.
Although Taylor’s video was somewhat compelling, it’s very individual based on a lot of factors. Hence my posts and response to it.
Sure - 1% to 2% of the workforce has jobs they’d do for free. The rest of us are working because we have to, and when we accumulate enough, we’re quitting.
Ran into a guy at Lowes that was 66 and still working. Just had a child. I told him congratulations and really was amazed how young he was. More power to him.
I guess we will all have to wait and see if Bellichick - at age 73 and starting a new job coaching at UNC - follows suit with his 24 year old “girlfriend”.