That is what I am finding with BYD. As others keep noting, BYD growth and profitability numbers are terrific. But one begins to see concerns upon closer looks.
I am a believer in the inevitable impact of age demographics, which says that economic growth in China and the EU will be in long-term decline. It doesn’t really matter what they do, a rapidly declining work force relative to a rapidly increasing dependent elder population is a big drag to any economy. Under such economic conditions where downturns are likely, the proportion of liabilities carried by Chinese and European companies become very important.
BYD as of Sep2024 has $500B USD in liabilities with a liquidity ratio of 0.7, a quick ratio of 0.47, and a cash ratio of 0.26. Ratios above 1.0, 1.0, 0.5, respectively are considered in the “healthy” range. This means that BYD would have difficulty covering its financial obligations in an economic downturn. As a comparison, Tesla has a liquidity ratio of 1.7, a quick ratio of 1.3, and a cash ratio of 0.57.
This is why by some calculations, BYD currently has an Altman Z-score of 1.74, “indicating it is in Distress Zones. This implies bankruptcy possibility in the next two years.” BYDDF (BYD Co) Altman Z-Score.
In comparison, Tesla’s Altman Z calculation by the same analysts “Tesla has a Altman Z-Score of 17.56, indicating it is in Safe Zones. This implies the Altman Z-Score is strong.”
I don’t believe BYD is going bankrupt, but I do believe it is a much riskier long-term investment than Tesla, simply because of the liabilities to assets ratios. In the addition, Tesla appears to be about to introduce the first of its mass-market cars that Deutsche Bank calls the Model Q. If that is very successful and eats into BYD China marketshare, BYD might be living in very interesting times.
The surprise introduction of the mass market Tesla makes sense if the goal is to avoid Osborne-ing 2024 Model 3/Y sales. https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a63138882/tesla-model-q-more-affordable-car-2025-report/