Musk Pay Package Vote & Karma

Somewhere on this there is a long thread about the shareholder vote on whether Musk’s previous approved pay package is excessive or not.
I have perused this thread previously and it seemed to me that it boiled down to 1)yes, Musk’s previous approved pay package is excessive 2)a deal is a deal.

I just ran across this news story.

Multiple reports and testimonies have painted
CEO Elon Musk as a tough taskmaster and an exacting leader. A Wall Street Journal report on Friday discussed the events that led up to the departure of one of the key deputies of the billionaire in 2021.

Jerome Guillen, who was with Tesla for about a decade and rose in the ranks to become the leader overseeing the company’s car division, quit in June 2021.

While he was with Tesla, the French auto industry executive was rewarded with equity grants, and by the end of 2020, his unvested equity in Tesla was valued at about $600 million, the Journal said, citing data from an Equilar Inc. analysis. As cracks appeared in the relationship between Musk and Guillen, the former asked him to forfeit some of his unvested equity, WSJ said, citing people familiar with the matter. Shortly after this, the executive quit.

Although what happened in the interim hasn’t been disclosed publicly, the Tesla CEO was worried that some employees are making more money from the company than their contributions merited, the report said.

Tesla executives are compensated predominantly with stock awards. Several controversies at the company over the years have their roots traced back to employee stock options

About 40 former Tesla employees had once sued the company for wrongfully disallowing them to vest stock options.

In Guillen’s case, he joined Tesla in 2010 from the then-Daimler AG, which is now part of Mercedes-Benz Group AG. He reportedly made important contributions when Tesla was struggling with the production of the Model 3 vehicle in 2018. In recognition of his role amid the crisis, he was promoted to president, overseeing the automotive division.

The relationship between Musk and Guillen soured, especially amid COVID-19, when the Fremont factory went into lockdown. The billionaire was unhappy with the speed at which Tesla was prepping to restart production, the report said. By the spring of 2021, Guillen was demoted to overseeing efforts to produce a semitrailer truck and was asked to forfeit his unvested equity. He reportedly refused to do so and then quit.

It seems that Musk wished to renege on the stock options granted to Guillen. But Guillen quit and walked off with them. There must not have been any clawback provision regarding Tesla shares.

Now Tesla shareholders are attempting to do to Musk what he tried with Guillen. Karma. Ha.
I suppose the shareholder vote will be determined on the value of future AI & robotic products and keeping Musk happy.


Shareholders WILL approve Elon’s package and there is nothing the haters can do.

1 Like

They can get a Delaware judge…

The Captain


The people with the real payday are the lawyers who brought the Musk pay package lawsuit, and are now haggling over a $5.6 Billion fee. {{ LOL }}

A 10% contingency fee is at the low end of what lawyers typically charge, but I guess the pay package lawsuit was considered a slam dunk in the Delaware Court of Chancery.

Tesla objects to $5.6 billion payout for lawyers who voided Musk’s pay (


1 Like