My portfolio at the end of October

My portfolio at the end of October

Here’s the summary of my positions at the end of October. This time I’m posting it actually on the last weekend of the month. The summary this month is again longer with more detail with more discussion than I used to have.

I’ll start off by saying that this has been a terrible month. And a terrible three months since the beginning of August, as we have been in the midst of a real correction. A number of my stocks have gotten pounded, really pounded into the ground, some for good reasons, some for less good reasons, and some for no reason at all. These pummeled stocks included all three of the top three positions that I entered the month with (SWKS, SKX, BOFI).

BOFI is down because of a short attack followed by a whistleblower lawsuit. We don’t know how authentic the reason is for the drop, but I’m out of it, as I’ve stated.
AMBA is down because of worries about GoPro and worries about being commoditized.
INFN for no particular reason.
SEDG because the price of oil is falling. And now because SCTY is slowing down.
SKX - truly for no good reason.
SNCR, there must be a reason but I haven’t even seen a short argument anywhere.
SWKS because it’s lumped as an “Apple supplier”.
CNC perhaps because people were worried about the integration of their merger. Also political worries.
ABMD it seems because their beat-and-raise wasn’t “enough” of a beat-and-raise.

But most of it is just because we are in a correction, so people are searching for reasons to sell, especially small cap stocks which have had a rise.

Note that all of these stocks above except SEDG and ABMD were recommended, and are still recommended, by at least one MF paid service.

Again, let me say that this was a tough month for our stocks. Really a tough month. We’ve been in a correction now for three months, and nothing a company reports is good enough. I started the month at up 33.1% and I’m now up 13.1%. I was down 15% during the month (113.1/133.3 = 0.85) due to a bunch of meltdowns, which I just mentioned above. However, after three months of this, I’m still up 13%, while the S&P is up 1%.

Please also note that I don’t ordinarily measure against the S&P, or any other index, but since I started this board I post my results against it since the MF uses it as their yardstick. There’s a reason that I don’t measure against indexes. My goal is to make money each year that my family and I will live off. That’s what counts for me. Measuring against the S&P is setting the bar very low, as it’s a mix of 500 good stocks, mediocre (average) stocks, and poor stocks, so averaging good, poor and mediocre, you’d expect a mediocre result as compared to selecting 10 or 20 good stocks.

I currently have thirteen positions total. I’ll try to tell you what I’ve done with each during the quarter. My biggest position, SWKS, was also my biggest position last month at 21%, at a price of $88, a PE of 18, and a rate of growth of earnings of 76%. Right now it’s at a position size of 21.9%, a price of $77, a PE of 16 (!), and still with a rate of growth of 76% as it hasn’t reported yet. Note the huge disconnect between the PE of 16 and the rate of growth of 76%! There has been NO company specific bad news.

What did I do in SWKS during the month? Well a couple of weeks ago it hit $75 intraday and I bought a bunch at $75.50. I just couldn’t resist in spite of my large position. The trouble was that it pushed my position size well over 23%, so I sold it back the same week at $80.25. No other trades during the month.

SKX was my second biggest position last month and is still my second biggest. Last month it was at a position size of 19.4%, at a price of $46.40 (split adjusted), a PE of $32, and a trailing rate of growth of 107%. Right now it’s at a position size of 17.4%, a price down to $31.20, a PE of 20, and a trailing rate of growth of 73%.

Why are they down from $46 to $31? Well, they announced revenue of $856 million, up from $674 million the year before, which was apparently interpreted as a disaster. Backlog was up 28%. Earnings were up 30%.

What did I do during the month? I bought a lot at $29.88, and a little bit more on three occasions at an average price of $31.70.

BOFI was my third biggest last month at 15.7%, and is now gone for reasons that have been extensively discussed.

INBK was my fourth biggest last month at 10.9%, and is now my third biggest at 12.8%. Last month it was at a price of $32.80, a PE of 21, and a trailing rate of growth of 123%. It reported a shocking earnings growth of only 82%, and its trailing earning growth has “fallen” to just 118%, so it sold off to $30.70 and a PE of 17.2 (!)

What did I do during the month? I bought some at about $31.40. I was willing to keep adding to INBK as I no longer felt over weighted in banks with BOFI gone. I had said for months that I especially had strong hopes for INBK but couldn’t take a bigger position in it because it’s such a small company with lack of liquidity, and that I already had a much larger position than was probably prudent for me. It indeed has continued to rise since then, and has grown on its own to become my third largest position in spite of my concerns.

My big three make up about 52% of my total portfolio. Although these are pretty high-conviction stocks, that’s a REAL lot in three stocks. They are in completely different fields: microchips, banking, and retail clothing. This wasn’t by design, but it spreads the risk. Their average trailing PE is roughly 18, which I’m very okay with. Their average rate of growth of trailing earnings is 89%, which is even better. This is not an inherently risky portfolio. After three months of getting pummeled, and a terrible last few weeks, I’m still up 13% year-to-date.

INFN has grown to be my fourth biggest position at 8.4%. Last month it was sixth at 6.2%, a price of $20.10, a PE of 35, and earnings growth of 142%. It has recently reported quarterly earnings up 100% and revenue up 34%, with a rate of growth of trailing earnings of 176%, so of course the share price has fallen to $19.75 on those terrible results, and the PE is down to 28.6.

What did I do in INFN during the month? I bought some at $18.00, and a little less at $18.60. (Yes, the price did get down close to $17.00, believe it or not).

AMBA is still my fifth biggest position at 7.6%. It was at 6.8% last month, with a price of 58.30 and a PE of 19.8, and a rate of growth of trailing earnings. It hasn’t yet announced but the share price has fallen to $49.50, which gives them a PE of roughly 16.8. I bought some at $57, but I feel that I now have enough because I’m not tech savvy enough to be able to judge their growth prospects going forward, in spite of all the recs and re-recs from various MF services.

LGIH is new this month, and is now my sixth biggest position at 6.9%. Its price is $28.00, its PE is 16.3, it is growing trailing earnings at 26%, but in the last two quarters quarterly earnings were up 50% or more. I took my position between $29.50 and $32.50. It has fallen in recent days because of disappointing national new-home sales (nothing company specific).

CASY is my seventh position at 6.2%. It was eighth at 4.8% last month, with a price of $106.40, a PE of 22 and earnings growth of 55%. They haven’t yet reported and the price, PE, and earnings growth are unchanged. I’ve been gradually adding to CASY between $103.50 and $108.50.

SNCR is eighth at 6.1%, a price of $35, a PE of 16 and a rate of earnings growth of 29%. It was 10th at 4.6% last month, at approximately the same price, and a PE of 17. It has reported earnings of 58 cents, up from 46 cents, and revenue of $151 million, up from $126 million. I added to my position this month.

Out of curiosity, I averaged my PE’s up to here and got 19.

SEDG is ninth at 5.6%, a price of $18.50 (which has fallen in half from $37 during the last month due to weakness in the price of oil, and then the weakness in SolarCity). Their trailing earnings, as close as I can figure them, are 66 cents, up from a loss the year before. Their PE is 28. I bought some on the way down at $22, but now will wait to see what happens.

ABMD is tenth at 4.3%, with a price of $73.60, a PE of 59, and a rate of growth of trailing earnings of 112%. They reported quarterly revenue up 47%, and GAAP earnings up 89%, but I’m waiting for their SEC filings to figure out what their real adjusted earnings were. I bought some at $69 intraday, when they fell hugely after that terrible quarterly report.

I’ll finish with AMZN, CNC, and AMAVF at 2.2%, 2.2%, and 1.2% positions. AMZN and AMAVF are new. I added to all three of these during the month. I sold off PAYC during the month, as it was very high PE, and I had various other stocks I wanted to buy.

What I do is “modified buy-and-hold”. Of my biggest three positions I’ve had SWKS and SKX over a year (about a year and four months and a year and five months), and INBK for just over a year. I had BOFI for about three years, before I sold it. I kept CELG and WAB for over two and a half years each. In no way is this “short-term trading”. When I buy a stock, it’s with the idea of holding it for as long as circumstances seem appropriate, NEVER with a price goal or the idea of trying to make a few points. If I try out a stock in a small position, and later decide it doesn’t fit and I sell it, I really don’t care whether I gain a dollar or lose one. I just sell out to put the money somewhere better.

Since I began in 1989, my entire portfolio has grown enormously. If you are new to the board and want to find out how I did it, and how you can do it yourself, I’d suggest you read posts #4 through #8 at the beginning of the board, and especially the Knowledgebase that Neil keeps for us (currently post #9939), which is a compilation of words of wisdom, and definitely worth reading if you haven’t yet.

Hope this has been helpful.

Saul

For Knowledgebase for this board
please go to Post #9939.

A link to the Knowledgebase is also at the top of the Announcements column
on the right side of every page on this board

73 Likes

I’ll start off by saying that this has been a terrible month.

**Stock Market Climbs 8% for October**
**Dow and S&P 500 notch best month in four years.**
http://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-climbs-8-for-oc…

I think it depends what you’re holding. Or if you’re holding. Yes, August was terrible for market investors - although even with the correction the market was up significantly over 2,3,4, and 5 years ago.

Again, let me say that this was a tough month for our stocks. Really a tough month. We’ve been in a correction now for three months

I know you don’t like to compare to indexes, but you have to compare to something, otherwise you’re handing out trophies just for showing up. So. The S&P has almost completely corrected “the correction.” Clearly some company stocks are doing well. Just as clearly some are not. (So what else is new?) It’s all about the companies you buy and the mood of the market. Durables did poorly in the 90’s when tech stocks were booming. Tech stocks did poorly in the aughts when durables were catching up. Nothing is forever. The market doesn’t have a memory, but sectors do tend to fall in and out of favor over long swings. Invest accordingly, I say.

24 Likes

Well, the Dow has recovered and S&P 500 and Nasdaq are getting there, but the NYSE and Russell 2000 are still down a fair bit … given that a fair number of TMF stocks are small …

http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/perf.php?$COMPQ,$NYA,$RUT,…

I currently have thirteen positions total. I’ll try to tell you what I’ve done with each during the quarter. My biggest position, SWKS, was also my biggest position last month at 21%, at a price of $88, a PE of 18, and a rate of growth of earnings of 76%. Right now it’s at a position size of 21.9%, a price of $77, a PE of 16 (!), and still with a rate of growth of 76% as it hasn’t reported yet. Note the huge disconnect between the PE of 16 and the rate of growth of 76%! There has been NO company specific bad news.

The “market” does not know what to do about Apple suppliers. NXPI got crushed, while Cirrus logic beat earnings and jumped 5% then fell.

http://news.investors.com/technology/102915-777927-cirrus-lo…
Revenue was in line with Cirrus Logic’s three-months-ago guidance for $290 million to $310 million. The company also reported 65 cents EPS — besting the consensus, which modeled 59 cents — but down 4% vs. a year earlier.

Cirrus, which provides two audio chips for the iPhone 6S series, is shopping the headset chip around to possible buyers, Rhode said. The noise-canceling function is based on software rather than form.
“Every potential customer we’ve shown it to, their one word is ‘Wow’,” he said.
For the current quarter, Cirrus Logic guided up to between $370 million and $400 million in revenue, which would be up 29% at the midpoint vs. the year-ago quarter.
(Sounds interesting, but not yet in one of our spreadsheets)

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2015/10/29/premiumcirr…

With so much of Cirrus’ revenue still coming from Apple, the success of the iPhone 6s is the most important factor for the company. Cirrus’ dependence on Apple has decreased over the past couple of years – during the second quarter of fiscal 2014, Apple accounted for 80% of revenue, far higher than today. As Cirrus’ products gain traction in mid-tier devices, this percentage could continue to decline going forward. However, if iPhone sales stumble at some point in the future, Cirrus remains heavily exposed.

http://www.thestreet.com/story/13344189/1/cirrus-logic-crus-…

Looking to the fiscal third quarter Cirrus Logic said it expects revenue between $370 and $400 million, compared to analysts’ estimates of $374.04 million for the quarter.

Cirrus Logic also announced that its board of directors authorized an additional $200 million for its buyback program, adding to the $32.5 million remaining from its previous authorization in November 2012

1 Like

and here are the pictures…

http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?TOP3R52P…

http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?Less6.5P…

Earnings remaining per yahoo:
SEDG 9/4
skws: 9/5
LGIH Nov 9-13est
AMBA Dec 2-7
CASY Dec 8-14

It highlights the huge gap down by Skechers. If they were to fill that it would be a nice trade.
I’m noticing here in Singapore Skechers is getting more prominent and is now sponsoring festivals over here (Sundown festival in Singapore which features Asian artists).
Ant

1 Like

and my fledgling portfolio.


Stock	Return	S&P	vs SP	of port
PAYCOM SOFTWARE	-5.84%	2.05%	-7.89%	19.89%
Skyworks Solutions	-12.19%	4.31%	-16.50%	17.32%
Dycom Industries, Inc.	-3.72%	3.26%	-6.98%	11.38%
Skechers	-2.04%	1.33%	-3.37%	9.33%
Ambarella	-29.55%	6.73%	-36.28%	9.24%
LGI HOMES INC	-7.28%	4.32%	-11.59%	8.38%
ABIOMED, Inc.	-10.22%	1.32%	-11.54%	8.26%
Infinera	8.81%	0.42%	8.40%	5.91%
Criteo	-5.46%	5.38%	-10.83%	5.69%
First Internet Bancorp	-4.95%	8.21%	-13.16%	4.59%
Casey's General Stores	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOLAREDGE TECH	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Synchronoss Technologies	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

oops, hit a wrong button and posted too soon, here with commentary

and my fledgling portfolio.


Stock	          Return S&P	vs SP	%port
PAYCOM SOFTWARE	 -5.84%	2.05%	-7.89%	19.89%
Skyworks Soluti	-12.19%	4.31%	-16.50%	17.32%
Dycom Industrie	-3.72%	3.26%	-6.98%	11.38%
Skechers	-2.04%	1.33%	-3.37%	9.33%
Ambarella	-29.55%	6.73%	-36.28%	9.24%
LGI HOMES INC	-7.28%	4.32%	-11.59%	8.38%
ABIOMED, Inc.	-10.22%	1.32%	-11.54%	8.26%
Infinera	8.81%	0.42%	8.40%	5.91%
Criteo	        -5.46%	5.38%	-10.83%	5.69%
First Internet	-4.95%	8.21%	-13.16%	4.59%
Casey's General	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SOLAREDGE TECH	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Synchronoss 	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

So, my 1YPEG portfolio is a small part of my overall portfolio and it may take me years to trust it fully and learn to implement on my own, so it will stay small for a while. I do own a good amount of INFN in my “other” portfolio that I obtained long ago at a good price. The shares here are new shares that 1YPEG has convinced me to add. CRTO had been on my watch list a while and I bought it with the support of 1YPEG data but did not sell it when Saul bailed. I am going to give it a little more rope. Dycom meets 1YPEG and I have presented it to the board, but no takers :wink: LGIH, I am happy to say, was a discovery from IBD that Saul ended up liking.

Note that INFN is the ONLY stock beating the S&P at this time and you know I have not been around long enough for good gains many of you have had. On the other hand I hope I am accumulating quality stocks during a downturn and patience will pay off.

I am using an SA scorecard to track my 1YPEG buys so I can be sure I am accurately judging my returns.

Pete

8 Likes

Please also note that I don’t ordinarily measure against the S&P, or any other index, but since I started this board I post my results against it since the MF uses it as their yardstick. There’s a reason that I don’t measure against indexes. My goal is to make money each year that my family and I will live off. That’s what counts for me. Measuring against the S&P is setting the bar very low, as it’s a mix of 500 good stocks, mediocre (average) stocks, and poor stocks, so averaging good, poor and mediocre, you’d expect a mediocre result as compared to selecting 10 or 20 good stocks.

I strongly disagree with this. While beating the S&P when it is down does not put food on the table, it is still a goal. While the S&P is a blend of good and terrible companies, they are priced as if they are good and terrible companies. I think, having read numerous posts here, that what you are actually doing is embracing risk, both from concentration and a company specific modes.

What I mean is this. The market will pay more for boring companies that will assuredly keep earning money far into the future than for companies that have a non-zero chance of going out of business. Use this as an example. Two companies A and B. Here are the profits per year with the probabilities of those profits:


Company Year mean profit  high possible  low possible dividend
A       1    .1           .2 (10%)       0 (10%)      0
A       2    .2           .4 (10%)       OOB (20%)    0
A       3    1            1.75 (20%)     OOB (30%)    0
A       4    2            4 (25%)        OOB (40%)    0

B       1    .30          .32 (10%)      .28 (10%)    .05
B       2    .31          .34 (10%)      .29 (10%)    .06
B       3    .32          .35 (10%)      .30  (10%)   .07
B       4    .33          .35 (10%)      .31 (10%)    .08

Both are growing (unless A goes out of business.)  If both companies executed flawlessly and hit all of the high possible numbers, A would be priced higher than B at the end of the period, but maybe not 11 times higher.  Your metrics would scream that A is a great company and B is a dog.  At some point, both will misstep and go out of business (pretty much every company eventually does), this will probably happen for A before to happens to B.  My contention is that the market might be pricing these two stocks correctly even if A looks incredibly cheap on a PEG basis; by purchasing A, you are getting 'paid' to take more risk.  Taking on risk is a great strategy until it isn't.  

I hope you have continued success.

Charles
1 Like

Charles, you might want to explore < pre > and < /pre > for bracketing tabular text so that the rest of your post will wrap in the usual way.

I’ll start off by saying that this has been a terrible month. And a terrible three months since the beginning of August, as we have been in the midst of a real correction.

That totally depends on how you have been investing and in what companies. All my various portfolios are either at all time highs or close to it within 1 or 2 percentage points. My aggressive trading account is up over 67% in 12 months, and other more conservative less traded (no options) accounts are all up 20%+ with the exception of one small IRA that was biotech concentrated and is up only 9% in that time period.

My only investment in Saul’s stock universe is BOFI and I got in it only recently after the big law-suit related drop via put options, hoping for a quick trading bounce that did not happen. Down a bit and will probably sell it and take the small losses.

Mehran

2 Likes

Not sure how I screwed this up the first time, I thought I used pre.
Please also note that I don’t ordinarily measure against the S&P, or any other index, but since I started this board I post my results against it since the MF uses it as their yardstick. There’s a reason that I don’t measure against indexes. My goal is to make money each year that my family and I will live off. That’s what counts for me. Measuring against the S&P is setting the bar very low, as it’s a mix of 500 good stocks, mediocre (average) stocks, and poor stocks, so averaging good, poor and mediocre, you’d expect a mediocre result as compared to selecting 10 or 20 good stocks.

I strongly disagree with this. While beating the S&P when it is down does not put food on the table, it is still a goal. While the S&P is a blend of good and terrible companies, they are priced as if they are good and terrible companies. I think, having read numerous posts here, that what you are actually doing is embracing risk, both from concentration and a company specific modes.

What I mean is this. The market will pay more for boring companies that will assuredly keep earning money far into the future than for companies that have a non-zero chance of going out of business. Use this as an example. Two companies A and B. Here are the profits per year with the probabilities of those profits:


Company Year mean profit  high possible  low possible dividend
A       1    .1           .2 (10%)       0 (10%)      0
A       2    .2           .4 (10%)       OOB (20%)    0
A       3    1            1.75 (20%)     OOB (30%)    0
A       4    2            4 (25%)        OOB (40%)    0

B       1    .30          .32 (10%)      .28 (10%)    .05
B       2    .31          .34 (10%)      .29 (10%)    .06
B       3    .32          .35 (10%)      .30  (10%)   .07
B       4    .33          .35 (10%)      .31 (10%)    .08

Both are growing (unless A goes out of business.) If both companies executed flawlessly and hit all of the high possible numbers, A would be priced higher than B at the end of the period, but maybe not 11 times higher. Your metrics would scream that A is a great company and B is a dog. At some point, both will misstep and go out of business (pretty much every company eventually does), this will probably happen for A before to happens to B. My contention is that the market might be pricing these two stocks correctly even if A looks incredibly cheap on a PEG basis; by purchasing A, you are getting ‘paid’ to take more risk. Taking on risk is a great strategy until it isn’t.

I hope you have continued success.

Charles

1 Like

I wrote this in my end of the month summary so it’s not new news:

I sold off PAYC during the month, as it was very high PE

PAYC just reported adjusted earnings of 8 cents, up from 5 cents. The reports trumpeted that it beat estimates by a penny, but 8 cents doesn’t cut it for a company selling at $39.00. On top of that the last three sequential quarters of adjusted earnings were 12 cents, 10 cents, and now 8 cents! And it’s not “seasonal”. Last year they made 3 cents, 4 cents, and 5 cents in the same three quarters. I’d be very cautious about this no matter how good the “story”.

I know that some people on the board really like PAYC, for some good reasons too, so this is just my opinion.

Saul

5 Likes

I sold off PAYC during the month, as it was very high PE

I agree with you Saul. I sold off Payc a couple of months ago because I was culling all my High P/E stocks but the problem was everything sold off. LOL

Andy

I think I identified the reason for the meltdown in SKX.
It is fears for growth slowdown (from 53% to 15%)
See my post 13746 and following threads.