Saul posed this question:
which of our stocks will get through this the best, and WHY?
OKTA: embedded deep in their customers with something the customers can’t live without. Secure sign in for all their employees, vendors, customers. The evidence that they are here to stay is that typical contracts with their enterprise customers are something on the order of 4 years! Who would sign up for 4 years if they thought there was a chance that they would switch. OKTA now has built in connections with something like 7000 apps/services; this takes time and money to replicate and is a reason why OKTA is dominating its space. OKTA is CFFO positive and improving that. They have $1.4B in cash. This means that they are basically self sustaining now and even if they fo FCF negative they have enough cash to ride things out. I currently have have 12.9% of my portfolio in OKTA.
AYX: huge ROI for customers. average contract length is 2 years. Automates business processes and workflows means saved money. Listen to the CFO interview from the week after the last earnings. AYX has become the standard for many workflows. It’s not going to be removed. Here’s another thing that I think will protect AYX: aren’t the number of people who know how to use AYX in short supply? Assuming they are then it is competitive for companies to get them so they won’t want to lay them off as it would be difficult to find a replacement when things return to normal. And assuming that they don’t lay them off the company may as well keep them productive and working on projects. And AYX is basically FCF positive now with a cash balance of $975M so they can easily survive even an extended difficult time. I have 40.8% in AYX but I expect I will be reducing it since it’s too high of an allocation.
Here is a post of mine of mine from about 6 months ago:
https://discussion.fool.com/chris-what-multiple-would-you-pay-fo…
Assuming their recent FCF target/guidance of 30-35% in 4 years and 50% CAGR on TTM revenue for 4 years, I would think that the company would be worth a 40-50x multiple on FCF at that time. So 4 years from now, I think AYX should be worth about $23B in the middle of 2023 with about 80M shares outstanding. Therefore, the share price would be about $290 which would give you a CAGR of 27% from here. I’m not worried about AYX long term.
Now, 6 months have gone by and we have received 2 more earnings reports in which revenue growth was 65% (in Q3 2019) and 75% (in Q4 2019). The company has also made continued progress in increasing its FCF. The stock price has dropped from $110 to $103 in spite of the better than expected results of the past 2 quarters. So now we are 3.5 years away (instead of 4 years) from the middle of 2023 with a lower stock price today and a higher than expected growth rate. So to calculate a new CAGR, I’ll use $103 today, 3.5 years away, and all the same assumptions as above. So 282% return in 3.5 years would be 35% CAGR. Even if we lost a full year due to the pandemic, we would have a CAGR of 26% over a 4.5 year period. Personally, I think there could be a lot of upside to this estimate as AYX may continue to grow revenue faster than an average of 50% per year and it could be valued higher than 50x of FCF.
PAYC: the customers love them and they’re in HR software which is necessary even (and especially) when companies hire and downsize. The have enormous FCF margins (>35%) so they are completely self funded and just increased their share buyback 2 days ago (tells us they are very confident in their future even with what’s going on). I have a 7.4% position in this one.
ZM: will only do better in this environment and they are solidly FCF positive (and increasing fast) with $844M of cash. I have a 5.6% position in ZM.
I have about 2/3 of my portfolio in the above four and I don’t see any long-term danger with any of them even if the economy runs into some serious headwinds for a while.
We can analyze each of our stocks in this way.
Chris