I personally don’t care for either but the “battle” is still worth a read.
Funnilly enough, I saw this last night. He’s a NINE- percenter! (9%)
The take-away:
But “Shark Tank” tough guy Kevin O’Leary says to hold on — you can retire with just $500,000 — a big difference from the $5 million he suggested last August…
O’Leary’s logic is that you can make about 5% in fixed income with little risk, but if you only have $500,000, that amounts to $25,000 per year. If you are willing to ride the volatility, you can invest in equities, providing up to a 9% return or about $45,000 annually.
Sure, in 2024 but you could not do that in 2019 - and you likely won’t be able to do that in 2027.
And even if you could, that 5% does not adjust for inflation.
One wonders how otherwise smart and success investors can become so detached from reality.
It’s astounding. It’s like they never heard of inflation and volatility. All the studies that result in safe withdrawal rates specifically take both those into account. I mean, it’s like some of these people truly believe that there can never again be a string of bad years in a row!
Hmmm…? Maybe I’d ask: So, when did you have your last “bad year”? Maybe that explains it?
That’s the difference between being an arithmetic-based financial planner (i.e. 4%) and a “personal finance entertainer”.
intercst