Just so people don’t get carried away, in real estate it’s about location, location, location. National sales figures don’t mean much. An investor will want to look at the local markets. For LGIH, look at the local market (down to the specific neighborhood or development) in which LGIH sells.
Hi Chris, I don’t get it. At every bit of good news for LGIH you have a negative counterpoint. But all the news has been good:
We’ve had it pointed out by the major wallboard company that Texas has been very busy selling houses in January (in spite of the oil bust),
We’ve learned that Texas had the 2nd highest job creations in 2015 (in spite of the oil bust),
We’ve learned that LGIH specifically had a 45% increase in closings last quarter (in spite of the oil bust),
And at higher prices,
And that their revenue was up 65% in the first nine months,
And that their earnings were up 77%,
And that they had record closings in January, up 51% from the year before,
Those are extraordinary percentages!
And they predicted closings up at least 20% for all of 2016,
And we know that they are at just ten times earnings,
And now we get confirmatory evidence from Bloomberg that national housing sales were up to almost record post-Recession levels in January, and growing, and your response is another warning?
About location? Seriously?
I have to admit that I am no expert on the housing market at all, but this doesn’t sound like location is a problem for them, or that we need to inspect the exact neighborhoods where they have their developments.
That doesn’t mean they can’t stumble in the future, even stumble badly, but things sure look awfully good for them at present, and at an incredibly cheap price.
JMO .
Best,
Saul