I appreciated some discussion in a recent video, by Tom, about the beta of stocks and how this is also considered when making picks for the various portfolios or best buys. I understand a portfolio with a beta of 1 approximates the volatility of the market; while less than 1 is less volatile and over 1 is more volatile. Is there a guideline for different levels of portfolio volatility above 1? Such as: 1+ - 1.49 is a little more volatile, 1.5+ - 1.99 is aggressive, 2+ is considered very aggressive . . . 3+ “don’t you need your money?”?
As I’ve used several MF services over time, I’d like a somewhat objective measurement that could give me a useful reference as to the current and developing volatility of my portfolio.
Thanks, in advance, for your thoughts and shared experience; and Fool On!
Jan