There were actually two plans:
1: make SS a disability only plan, so that able bodied geezers, regardless of age, would be forced back into the workforce. The downside of this is a lot of those crusty old geezers vote, and would not like being forced back to daily endurance of the bellowings of a “JC”.
2: make SS applicants jump through hoops, like providing extensive documentation of their identity and eligibility to receive SS benefits. This has the advantage of the majority of geezers receiving full benefits, while a minority are cut off entirely. The majority would be fine with that, as it would not hurt them, and everyone excluded would be proclaimed “frauds”.
When I applied for SS, I mosied down to the SS office in Livonia, less then 10 miles from casa del Steve, with a couple pieces of documentation and sat for a brief interview. I didn’t know there was a way to do it over the phone, or maybe there wasn’t, 9 years ago.
Seems the plan under consideration is option #2: total denial of benefits to those who can’t jump through hoops.
ripped from the headlines
The changes include requiring that people seeking benefits provide proof of identity over the internet for benefit claims made over the phone. If someone is “unable to utilize the internet ID proofing, customers will be required to visit a field office to provide in-person identity documentation.”
Introducing internet verification would be a significant hardship to the 40 percent of Social Security beneficiaries who depend on the phone service. If they can’t use the internet system, they would also have to visit a physical location. Diaz’s own memo estimates that 75,000 to 85,000 people would have to visit Social Security offices under the new policy.
And, of course, closing a lot of field offices, to throw up another barrier to claiming benefits is part of the plan.
So, “denial of benefits” is the plan. See? Earning that MBA, all those years ago, pays off again. I can shift into “JC” thinking mode in an eyeblink.
Steve