Another disappointing earnings results from UiPath, which sent its share price -8% afterhours. Although most of us here do not have a position, I thought I would summarize today’s results as I introduce it to the board [1].
ARR [2]: Reached $726M, which represents +60% YoY and +11.3% QoQ.This is a significant slowdown from Q2’FY21 and Q2’FY20 YoY growth of +87% and +159%, respectably.
Net-New ARR: $73.9M, a slight increase from last quarter’s $72M (+33% YoY).
Revenue: Topped $195M, which represents +40% YoY and +5.0% QoQ. Again, a dramatic slowdown from Q2’FY21 YoY growth of 81%.
Remaining Performance Obligations: Totaled $520M, representing +80% YoY and +12.1% QoQ.
Non-gaap Gross Margin: Shrunk from 88% last quarter, to 86%.
Non-gaap Adjusted FCF [3]: Improved moderately from -$24.6M this quarter last year, to -$20.1M.
Net Retention Rate: Hit 144%, a slight slowdown from 145% two quarters ago at the time of IPO.
Customer Count: Increased moderately (+7.0% QoQ, 36% YoY) from 8,500+ to 9,100. More importantly, customers with ARR > $100k increased more notably from 1,105 to 1,247 (+12.8% QoQ, +59% YoY); and those with ARR > $1M increased from 104 to 108 QoQ (+126% YoY). These customers are imperative for UiPath as they constitute ~75% and ~35% of revenue, respectably.
New Logos: Included the State of New Mexico, the New York Power Authority, and the University of Washington Medicine.
Despite being the clear market leader in process automation, it is clear that some of UiPath’s issues with its business model are becoming a bigger issue as they scale. Perhaps the clearest example is comparing its growth endurance, to a few other companies – and this is even using the ARR they tell us to look at! [5]
Docusign: 111%
Bill: 96%
Zoominfo: 91%
Snowflake: 87%
Crowdstrike: 80%
UiPath: 69%
In addition to their business model concerns, it seems like they are succeeding with expanding their very large customers, while having trouble growing their mid-tier customers and acquiring net new customers. There may be other issues at play, but based on these results it is clear that the business looks very different than it did a year ago.
-RMTZP
Please read this before posting https://discussion.fool.com/we-are-having-a-board-emergency-3492… and visit https://discussion.fool.com/for-board-newcomers-and-oldtimers-34… to maximize your learning of the board
[1] https://discussion.fool.com/uipath-path-34792441.aspx
[2] There was a continuous emphasis to focus on ARR as opposed to revenue growth, “as a reminder, given the variability introduced by ASC 606, we do not focus on the business on short-term revenue growth which can be lumpy quarter to quarter, and dislocated from ARR and the long-term growth and health of the business.”
[3] While at first glance it looks like FCF improved significantly, a closer look reveals that they reported “non-gaap adjusted FCF” compared to “non-gaap FCF” last quarter. It is difficult to compare since last quarter showed a three month period vs. six month period this quarter – but this caught my eye.
[4] https://discussion.fool.com/growth-retention-rate-34776232.aspx?..
[5] Using subscription revenue for comparables (product revenue for Snowflake).