A brief update on my positions and thoughts

Wow 19 responses so far and they are ALL on EV/S ratios. I really hit a nerve.

Not a single person commented on me changing my mind and buying back into Mongo (too obvious, I guess),

or adding to Square (ditto, perhaps),

or my reducing my Alteryx a bit for the cash for those purchases,

or eliminating Gardant Health (maybe another mistake on my part).

But how about adding a tiny bit to my already huge Twilio position?

Or adding a little to Elastic when others were selling out?

It must be that emotional attachment to having something like EV/S that makes people feel that they are connected to “value” that brought out all those responses. But I’m just guessing there.

Best,

Saul

22 Likes

Saul,
I did note the adds of SQ and MDB and dumping GH.
Honestly, first thing I thought was “how come he didn’t add more to TTD?” TTD always seems to be the stock that people doubt, and then the ER hits and they love it again, and then over the next 3 months doubt creeps back in. Hopefully their ER later this month is another good one.

On EV/S, I did a “math” experiment on NPI, looking at a strong high-growth company example of Splunk. I then compared it to AYX and TTD. Basically the idea was, is it realistic that a company will keep a 23 P/S ratio for 6 more years, in the case of AYX. Since Splunk is set to announce full year 2018 calendar revenues of $1.7b, they are pretty mature and have had success that AYX and TTD should aspire to replicate.

If, and a messy IF I realize, Splunk has a fair P/S at 12, and if AYX and TTD follow similar revenue growth numbers and eventually reach $1.7b and are awarded at that time a trailing P/S of 12 (like Splunk) what does that stock growth look like?

Using market caps of today, and extrapolating them out to 19b (same as Splunk) and gradually tapering off their P/S to finish at 12, I found:

If we started today, with $25,000 in AYX, it would grow to $115,000 in 6 years time, or 28.96% CAGR.
If we started today, with $25,000 in TTD, it would grow to $75,000 in 4 years time, or 31.61% CAGR.

In order for AYX to go from 23 trailing P/S to 12, over 6 years, let’s look at it gradually:

start of:
2019 23, on 200m, mkt cap 4.1b
2020 21, on 300m, mkt cap 6.3b
2021 19, on 450m, mkt cap 9.5b
2022 17, on 675m, mkt cap 11.4b
2023 15, on 950m, mkt cap 14.2b
2024 13, on 1.2b, mkt cap 15.6b
2025 12, on 1.6b, mkt cap 19.2b

Do we really think it will be so nice and gradual. Or will it plummet, say next year. All it will take is for the stock to go sideways for most of one year for a huge drop in P/S.

2019 23, on 200m, mkt cap 4.1b
2020 18, on 300m, mkt cap 5.6b, about a 36% stock price gain (lower than the growth rate, duh.)
2021 16, on 450m, mkt cap 7.2b
2022 14, on 675m, mkt cap 9.4b
2023 13, on 950m, mkt cap 12.3b
2024 13, on 1.2b, mkt cap 15.6b
2025 12, on 1.6b, mkt cap 19.2b

I guess the point of all the above is to say that valuation does matter in the sense that AYX or TWLO or TTD, at the start of 2018, were able to grow their stock price appreciation well-above their revenue growth rate, due to multiple expansion. At some point, the market won’t justify that continuing.

So at the start of 2019, where we find ourselves today with AYX, TWLO, and TTD (just as examples) can we expect the same kind of share performance this year as we saw in 2019? Unlikely, unless revenue growth dramatically accelerates past the already market-leading 50%+y/y growth they already have.

So I would contend, that over next 4-6 years, from this current level, AYX, TWLO, and TTD would almost likely have to see their share price appreciation match or go lower than their revenue growth rate, as companies typically get lower P/S ratios as they mature.

SHOP was an outlier here, as they had that unique 70%+ y/y growth for an extended period.

This isn’t to say AYX or TTD or TWLO won’t continue to be market-beating investments…rather just that I don’t think they will be as otherworldly as they were in 2018.

Dreamer

26 Likes

Not a single person commented on me changing my mind

I was busy rethinking selling my Elastic.
I had just finished telling my co-workers, “if Elastic looks so over valued, why is Saul adding to it?”

Thank you

John
Man who buys before dips

SQ is still down 19% for me but you have given me faith.

Saul,
How did you decide to add TO TWLO, and MDB? I know they are great companies. Many (and I include myself in that) would say these stocks have run up a fair bit and likely to pull back. Why not wait for a better entry point? I realize you never consider valuation. Have you always been like that or only recently with SAAS?

As to your moves, Saul, thank you for sharing (again). I don’t move around as often as you and some others here and I’m not as concentrated, but I greatly appreciate the information and analysis.

AKA, I never left Mongo, have a pretty sizable position in Square already, am sitting on Elastic until I figure out my own path with valuations, never bought Gardant, am riding Alteryx to the moon, and have considered adding to both Twilio and Trade Desk this week.

1 Like

I was only surprised that you added more to Twilio Saul, considering it was already +20% position for you. But then again, I just view it as a statement of just how confident you are in the company. (duh).

I figure with Guardant Health, even though it will be only 4 months or less now until FDA approval, you can always buy back in. Plus it was only a 2% or so holding for you I believe.

Glad to see you turned that speedboat around on MongoDB. :slight_smile:

Best,
Matt

2 Likes

And so mission critical software and services went without upgrades and support.

It is one thing to stop paying maintenance on software acquired under perpetual license and quite another thing for SaaS software. The perpetual software merely stops improving or being fixed, but the SaaS software is gone.

5 Likes

“how come he didn’t add more to TTD?” TTD always seems to be the stock that people doubt, and then the ER hits and they love it again, and then over the next 3 months doubt creeps back in.

Yep, Dreamer Dad, the doubt creeps back in. It’s an advertising stock after all, so doubt should creep back in. It’s, by definition almost, MUCH more risky than a SaaS company.
Best,
Saul

5 Likes

“if Elastic looks so over valued, why is Saul adding to it?”

Hi Money Slob, how could it not be over-valued growing revenue at over 70%. How many companies grow at a rate like that?

"SQ is still down 19% for me but you have given me faith.

Here’s for a little more faith …From my January summary: Its total revenue has grown year-over-year by 39%, 41%, 45%, 47%, 51%, 60%, and 68% in its last seven quarters. Instead of revenue growth returning to the mean, as they get larger their rate of revenue growth has increased each quarter, and accelerated. That 68% in Sept was up from 60% sequentially, and from 45% yoy. Extraordinary!

And read about their new products on their website.

Best,

Saul

15 Likes

Saul, Sure you noticed that Shop has been creeping back up there… you rethought MDB, SQ and Ntnx…and yet Shop could surprise us all…thoughts?

How did you decide to add TO TWLO, and MDB? I know they are great companies. Many… would say they have run up a fair bit and are likely to pull back. Why not wait for a better entry point?

Hi TexMex,
I added to Twilio because I think, as someone suggested on the board, that they will become the AWS of communications, a true powerhouse. I restarted MDB because I should be in it. I’m buying companies for a 300%-400% rise, at least (hopefully). That makes it a no-brainer. Get in for 300% or stay out and hope for a 3% or 5% drop? And maybe miss it completely.
Best,
Saul

21 Likes

I didn’t drop MDB when Saul dropped it. Unlike him, I do database driven applications for a living/hobby.

I don’t use MongoDB, nor do I have any other interest than just geeking out on it.
However, what kept me in it was the developers that answer and ask questions on StackOverflow.

As any developer knows, 95% of the time is spent on 5% of the problems.
Knowing how to ask a question on StackOverflow will bless you with solutions that would take a lot longer if you were to look for them elsewhere.

When opening up a question on StackOverflow, you must approach them with your head bowed, and peanuts in your hand, and not look in their eyes. If you look, they will jump on you and cyber-devour you. But, oh god, how many good solutions I’ve gotten from others on StackOverflow that suffered before me.

Anyway, I read they voted 100% for MongoDB being their favorite database.

That is why I stayed in MDB.

44 Likes

I simply have never made money on any stock that was not considered “overvalued”. Never, ever.

Of course there comes a point where enough is enough and it is a bubble. There is always an excess in the real world to anything. Even too many vitamins, too much love, etc. So don’t give me the exception to attack the rule.

If you think it is a bubble, by all means sell. That is my advice always. I will not ignore extreme valuations. To date, however, as Saul talked about, one would NEVER have invested in SHOP, EVER, if one did not invest in “overvalued” stocks.

One may very well invest in Talend (growth at reasonable value - as the phrase is so often used) but not Okta.

Each must follow their own ways, while still having the strength and flexibility to learn as we go.

Tinker

11 Likes

Anyway, I read they voted 100% for MongoDB being their favorite database.

Whoa!

Money, can you give us more details how this voting works and some context. I’d appreciate it. As this is clearly a very material number. Not so much as to whether to invest in Mongo, but as to how much confidence to give it, either to hold through thick and thin, or how much to allocate to it.

I did drop out of MDB for a few days, but immediately thereafter bought back in after ascertaining the innocuous nature of the threat from AWS. I’d prefer to never have to be concerned (naively) about such things again.

Thanks.

Tinker

3 Likes

Hmmm
I can’t remember and I could be crazy.
Still going to stay long.

This StackOverflow survey doesn’t say 100%, but it puts MongoDB way up.

https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2018/

3 Likes

Ok, these numbers are off that survey, but this guy makes the “Most Wanted” one more important.
MongoDB was most wanted.

https://www.mongodb.com/blog/post/stack-overflow-research-de…

3 Likes

I was only surprised that you added more to Twilio Saul, considering it was already +20% position for you. But then again, I just view it as a statement of just how confident you are in the company. (duh).

Hi Matt, That’s correct.

I figure with Guardant Health, even though it will be only 4 months or less now until FDA approval, you can always buy back in. Plus it was only a 2% or so holding for you I believe.

GH expects 3 major growth drivers for 360.
1)Pan-cancer FDA approval in 2019.
2)Pan-cancer medicare coverage (currently coverage is for non small cell lung cancer)
3)Results of their NILE study to demonstrate non-inferiority of guardant 360 in non small cell lung cancer. If they get favorable results this would mean those patients could have liquid biopsy tests instead of invasive lung biopsies/wedge resections.

Look at all the things that good go partly wrong. Only get approved for some cancers, the ones they’ve already worked with. Only get approved for come cancers on Medicare, and in some parts of the country, and not immediately. Nile study shows “almost” as good as invasive biopsies, etc etc.

Glad to see you turned that speedboat around on MongoDB. :slight_smile:

Yep, my specialty is U-turns. :grinning:

Saul

13 Likes

Ok, I think why I came up with 100% percent because my eyes crossed after hearing that the survey had 100,000 developers answer it.

1 Like

I didn’t drop MDB when Saul dropped it… I don’t use MongoDB, nor do I have any other interest than just geeking out on it. However, what kept me in it was the developers that answer and ask questions on StackOverflow… Anyway, I read they voted 100% for MongoDB being their favorite database. That is why I stayed in MDB.

Hi Moneyslob,

Gee, I wish you had posted that on the board BEFORE I got out, instead of now, when it’s all over.:grinning:
Saul

5 Likes

Easy mistake to make. Still powerful evidence. There is so much resistance against Mongo from not just competitors but also status quo developers who are skeptical :face_with_raised_eyebrow: about the new, to simply those emotionally attached against or for something else.

It is difficult to find objective validation other than quarterly reports and a survey like this w 100,000 surveys (which is huge. Forget statistical error or substantial bias errors) that also corresponds w the DB rankings.

I did ask what database can replace Mongo as a general purpose modern database and no one had an answer other than for niche uses, but nothing that can do all Mongo does. Sure Postgres and Mongo share some use cases, Cassandra is great w huge data sets, etc but neither can replace Mongo.
And Cassandra is actually losing favor, relatively speaking as it is falling in the DB rankings.

I’ll take a closer look at the details.

Thanks.

Tinker

9 Likes