AMD price increases

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-raising-epyc-cpu-prici…

AMD is purportedly raising prices of its EPYC data center processors for some customers by 10% to 30%, a new reality in the face of chip shortages that have resulted in reduced visibility for future shipments. We reached out to AMD for comment on the matter, but the company declined due to its policy of not commenting on customer pricing. The report also cites a potential delay for Intel’s next-gen Sapphire Rapids chips into Q3 2022, meaning Intel could miss the re-revised timeline it announced last year.

The excerpt comes from a report by Mizuho Securities’ Managing Director Jordan Klein that cites Dolly Wu, the VP and GM of Datacenter/Cloud at Inspur Systems (the world’s second-largest server vendor).

The report says that AMD has increased pricing by 10 to 30%, but the impact varies by customer, with large cloud customers given less of an upcharge. The report claims that without any guidance of when more CPUs could arrive, AMD’s customers are simply accepting the higher prices.

Advertisement

AMD

(Image credit: Mizuho)
AMD’s Milan holds the peak performance, and perhaps more importantly, performance-per-watt crown in the data center. Milan’s higher core counts also offer superior performance density, thus allowing data centers to cram in more performance per server and further lower their operating costs, all of which is obviously attractive enough to justify the price increases.

AMD’s price hikes aren’t surprising given ongoing shortages coupled with its reliance upon outside firms for both lithographic (wafer) and packaging (OSAT) capacity, with the latter being a particular pain point in the industry. Both of these factors could impact EPYC supply more acutely than AMD’s other types of chips due to EPYCs multi-chip design that scales up to nine die in a single package. Manufacturing costs have risen at nearly every link in the supply chain, and AMD’s price increases probably reflect the company passing that increased pricing on to its customers, as opposed to simply hiking prices to increase margin.

The report also says that Intel has ramped Ice Lake production and projects a possible 50% year-over-year increase in supply in 2022. In addition, in an attempt to retain market share, Intel isn’t raising prices for its Ice Lake processors. Both of those factors could help blunt AMD’s market share gains.

However, the report claims that Intel’s 7nm Sapphire Rapids’ full-scale volume launch will be delayed until ‘maybe’ Q3 2022 (Intel had previously projected the formal launch in Q2 2022). Furthermore, the firm doesn’t anticipate Sapphire Rapids will help Intel much, predicting that Intel will see further market share degradation due to ‘materially higher’ BOM pricing for Sapphire Rapids.

1 Like

Interesting tidbit that Sapphire Rapids appears to be delayed until Q3. We will see what Intel says at earnings.
Alan

AMD has held the performance crown for a while by most (but not all) metrics. They have been supply constrained but chose not to raise prices to gain market share.

I view this as good news, possibly backed up by great news, or possible backed up by not so good news. A 10% or more revenue increase for EPYCs with no significant cost increase is good news. If AMD is doing this because they are sure they will hold the performance crown for a while, that would be great. If this is because AMD cannot rapidly increase their supply of EPYC chips, that’s not so good.

Overall, this has to be good news for AMD’s revenues and margins.

2 Likes

I view this as good news, possibly backed up by great news, or possible backed up by not so good news. A 10% or more revenue increase for EPYCs with no significant cost increase is good news. If AMD is doing this because they are sure they will hold the performance crown for a while, that would be great. If this is because AMD cannot rapidly increase their supply of EPYC chips, that’s not so good.

I wonder if this is a bit of a misunderstanding by the trade press. A am sure that AMD’s EPYC prices have gone up–as AMD moved from Rome to Milan to Milan x. In effect, Milan X is a sort of half-generation between Milan and Genoa.

The part numbers don’t always match up, but this page https://wccftech.com/amd-epyc-milan-x-server-cpus-listed-pre… has “preliminary” Milan X prices. Surprise! They are higher than the non-3d cache Milan parts which are otherwise identical. When this page was first published, there were no MSRP prices for Milan X chips–but you could pay retail. :wink: I suspect that the current news is about those MSRP numbers, and AMD is charging prices that reflect what these chips can do compared to regular Milan chips. (AMD will want to price things so that if you don’t need the extra cache, you are unlikely to pay for it.)

1 Like