U.S. Companies Are Still Slashing Jobs to Reverse Pandemic Hiring Boom
Many corporations binged on labor during the pandemic. Now, facing economic uncertainty and threats from AI, they are slimming down.
by Konrad Putzier and
Chip Cutter, The Wall Street Journal, 1/29/2026
…
Amazon said Wednesday that it would lay off an additional 16,000 corporate employees after laying off 14,000 workers in the fall. The combined cuts amount to around 10% of Amazon’s corporate workforce. On Tuesday, UPS said it expected to slash 30,000 jobs this year, on top of 48,000 job cuts last year, saying the company needed to “right-size.” Also on Tuesday, social-media company Pinterest said it planned to shrink its workforce by up to 15%…
By many measures, the U.S. economy still boasts a relatively healthy job market. The layoffs are heavily concentrated among a small number of big companies, and overall job losses are low by historical standards. The unemployment rate, while up from 2024, is well below prepandemic levels. …
Hiring has nevertheless slowed to a crawl. People who lose their job today often have a hard time finding a new one, and they stay out of work for longer. In December, the average length of unemployment was 24.4 weeks, according to Labor Department data. In December 2022, the figure was 19.4 weeks…
“In this current market, people need to realize what they’ve done might not be what they’re going to be doing forward,” he said. “They’ve got to constantly be evolving.” [end quote]
I think “constantly evolving” is a euphemism for “these jobs are gone and they aren’t coming back.”
In classic recessions, a rise in unemployment causes lower demand which feeds into lower sales, higher inventories and more layoffs. But eventually the economy recovers and the jobs return.
In a world of AI and automation the jobs may not return.
It’s very hard for average workers to “constantly evolve.” It’s hard for average people to acquire new skills, especially skills that are beyond the capacity of machines and which also pay well.
For the past couple of weeks I worked with ChatGPT to generate a legal document as part of my estate planning. This took hours of iterations to get just right. DH and I went to a lawyer yesterday to read it, confirm that it’s OK, and notarize it after we signed it. That lawyer visit took 3/4 hour (including discussions) and cost me $300. I have no doubt that the lawyer would have charged thousands for generating the document de novo.
My sister told me yesterday that her son (who has a Master’s degree in math education but no training in computer programming) edited and corrected a gaming program created by a friend…with the help of AI.
AI will pull the rug out from under many professionals at the same time that automation pulls the rug out from under the physical work force. This is happening today, in real time.
Wendy