Control Panel: Are we there yet, Mommy?

The stock and bond markets have both been hammered this year as the SPX plunged 17% (the NAZ much worse) and the entire Treasury yield curve shifted up.

So far, the Federal Reserve has only raised the fed funds rate by 0.5%. They sure got a bang for their buck! They have announced another 0.5% raise in each of June and July. Plus, they have announced that they will begin selling longer-term Treasuries and mortgage bonds beginning June 1. The mortgage rate jumped in response.

But they haven’t actually done these moves yet. And they said that they are planning to reach for a “neutral” fed funds rate which won’t stimulate the economy. That implies that the fed funds rate needs to be at least as high as the inflation rate because a negative real rate pays speculators to borrow money. The Fed also said that they will do whatever it takes to bring inflation down to their desired range of 2% even if it means that unemployment will rise.

The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, which is the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, is currently 6.3%. Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, Excluding Food and Energy (which the Fed likes because food and energy prices are volatile) is 4.9%. The inflation rate dropped 0.3% from March to April which caused some people to jump for joy. YIPPEE!! ( /sarcasm – this is hardly impressive.)

The Fed didn’t mention the asset markets because maintaining high asset prices is not part of the Fed’s mandate. They know perfectly well that asset prices will fall as a result of their actions to drain liquidity (Quantitative Tightening), just as asset prices rose as a result of their actions to increase liquidity (Quantitative Easing).

Last week was a pretty good week in the markets. Both stock and bond prices rose a little. Investors rejoiced. One our own METARs took the opportunity to gleefully stick out his tongue at John Hussman, a famous bear.
https://www.hussmanfunds.com/comment/mc220429/

The rise looked like noise to me. It doesn’t look like a trend change…yet. But lots of people are looking for a bottom.

Mommy, are we there yet?

It’s clear that the Fed wants to bring down inflation as painlessly as possible. They want a soft landing, not a recession. Will inflation recede by itself? What are the signs?

Consumer price inflation is caused by too many dollars in consumer pockets chasing too few goods and services. Fiscal stimulus that was sent to consumers in 2020 and 2021 was partially spent but a lot went into savings. (And a lot went into the stock market.) M1 is the money supply of cash and readily-spent checking accounts.

M1 peaked and declined a touch last month. Real Disposable Personal Income: Per Capita is about what it was at the end of 2019 after peaking in 2020 and 2021 due to fiscal stimulus. The personal savings rate declined to 4.4% as people spent from their savings accounts. Personal savings is now lower than 4Q2019. This shows that demand has peaked. It’s unlikely that consumers will suddenly get a large, unusual infusion of cash. Wages are up but so are prices and profits, so labor’s share of economic income is flat. These factors tend to dampen inflation.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/workers-share-of-economic-pie-i…

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M1SL
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVE
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A229RX0

The supply side is constrained. Retailers: Inventories to Sales Ratio is far below normal. And energy prices (oil and natgas) which feed into many products, transport and cooling in summer are still rising fast. These are highly inflationary.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/bottleneck-fuels-record-high-ga…

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/RETAILIRSA

A determined Fed trend change has the potential to cause a recession and/ or a financial panic. The decline in stock market values has been orderly, not a panic, as shown by a moderate VIX and low Financial Stress and moderately elevated yield spread. Air is being let out of a classic bubble. The bubble was caused by emergency liquidity which is now being withdrawn. The deflation of the bubble was predictable. It will not reinflate. The stock market will return to normal if the Fed returns to neutral.
https://www.multpl.com/shiller-pe
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/STLFSI3
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BAMLH0A3HYC

If the Fed actually does stick to its guns and reach a neutral rate the stock and bond markets will continue to decline. Trillions of dollars of value will evaporate from these markets. (Including the bond assets held by the Fed itself.)

Last week, the Fear & Greed Index was in Extreme Fear, but not abject terror. The trade was risk-on as stocks and junk bonds rose faster than the 10YT. The USD weakened, causing gold to strengthen a touch. The “mungofitch ratio” of copper to gold was stable.

The “mungofich 99-day rule” triggered as the SPX has not seen a new high in over 99 trading days. This has historically presaged a more serious fall in the stock market.

The percent of SP100 stocks above their 200 day moving average was over 35% after falling from 75% at the start of 2022. This is weak but still moderate and not a panic level.

How should we look at these moderately poor but not terrible indicators? VIX, Financial Stress, Fear & Greed Index, junk bond spreads, stock market internals? Is this a glass half-full (the markets have stabilized and will rise from here)? Or is it a glass half-empty (the markets have a long way to fall, whether or not they panic along the way)?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-stock-investors-are-watchi…

Jeff and intercst would say it doesn’t matter. The only days that matter are when you buy and when you sell stocks. Bear markets in between have no impact…unless you bought high at a level that won’t be seen again for a long time, maybe not until after you need to sell.

Will the markets destabilize next week when the Fed carries through on its stated plans because interest rates will rise? Or will it stabilize because the traders will be reassured that the Fed’s word can be trusted and has already been baked in? I think the latter is more likely. But the markets will be very sensitive to economic signals.

The METAR for next week is partly sunny, perhaps with a few intermittent showers. But this is not a trend change. As the Fed continues to tighten, asset prices will continue to fall the way that autumn naturally cools into winter. If we are lucky, we will avoid stagflation, but it’s too soon to tell.

Wendy

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?VTI,$SP…

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?$IRX,$U…

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.html?$SPX,$U…

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/yieldcurve.php

https://www.cnn.com/markets/fear-and-greed

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US

https://www.bea.gov/data/personal-consumption-expenditures-p…

https://www.bea.gov/data/personal-consumption-expenditures-p…

18 Likes

<We’ve got 40 years of catch up to do on poverty wage job creation. >

The Federal Reserve has stated that they intend to bring down inflation even if unemployment rises. That’s a pretty definite statement that unemployment WILL rise. Once unemployment is higher (and presumably inflation is lower since that’s the objective) the pressure to raise wages will ease off.

Your post is wishful thinking and so political that I’m debating FAing it. There’s no data there, just polemics.

Wendy

3 Likes

That’s a pretty definite statement that unemployment WILL rise. Once unemployment is higher (and presumably inflation is lower since that’s the objective) the pressure to raise wages will ease off.

Yup. As offered before, rising unemployment will enable wage and benefit rollbacks, and the rollbacks are expected to reel in inflation, by 1: reducing costs for the “JCs” and 2: reducing demand. Whether reducing costs for the “JCs” will “trickle down” to reduced retail prices, is another matter. I remember economists, for decades, talking about the difficulty of “pushing on a string”.

Steve

1 Like

<<That’s a pretty definite statement that unemployment WILL rise. Once unemployment is higher (and presumably inflation is lower since that’s the objective) the pressure to raise wages will ease off.>>

Yup. As offered before, rising unemployment will enable wage and benefit rollbacks, and the rollbacks are expected to reel in inflation, by 1: reducing costs for the “JCs” and 2: reducing demand. Whether reducing costs for the “JCs” will “trickle down” to reduced retail prices, is another matter. I remember economists, for decades, talking about the difficulty of “pushing on a string”.

How do you square that with Bank of America’s recent adoption of $22/hr minimum wage? (North Carolina proudly maintains the state minimum at $7.25.) Clearly CEOs are feeling the heat on wages and job creation.

We’ll know in about 6 months whether you and Wendy are right. I wonder what Corporate America’s view is on a Hungary-style far rightward shift with Dickensian social policy? Is that good or bad for business going forward?

I’m already pricing out apartments in Barcelona just in case an evacuation is indicated.

intercst

2 Likes

The demand regardless of wealth in the US economy is too great right now. Odds are a mild recession.

It is the major financials that will take the surprise, not so surprising, hit out of China. As counter parties to many of China’s instruments the proverbial is going to be hitting the fan.

The market can go steeply down while the economy is not actually bad.

As offered before, rising unemployment will enable wage and benefit rollbacks, and the rollbacks are expected to reel in inflation

Yet corporations do not appear to be hurt by the inflation.
https://www.yahoo.com/now/critics-corporate-greed-making-inf…
The net profit margin of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies in the first quarter has been running at 12.3%, based on estimates and earnings reported so far, according to FactSet. That’s down from a peak of 13.1% in the second quarter of last year but well above the pre-COVID-19 level of about 11%.

“Profit margins should be coming down,” says Owens of Groundwork Collaborative, who testified at a Senate Budget Committee hearing on corporate profiteering and inflation early this month. Instead, she noted, “they’re actually growing.”

https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-pocket-largest-pro…
Companies are pocketing their fattest profits in more than 70 years, even as they complain about inflation

3 Likes

How do you square that with Bank of America’s recent adoption of $22/hr minimum wage?

Those wage increases can be taken away a lot faster than the time the company took to implement them. I have had “JCs” cut my pay often enough to know.

Steve

<<How do you square that with Bank of America’s recent adoption of $22/hr minimum wage?>>

Those wage increases can be taken away a lot faster than the time the company took to implement them. I have had “JCs” cut my pay often enough to know.

Sure that works when labor has no other alternatives. Not so much when there are 11.5 million jobs currently open and job creators are having trouble even getting someone to show up for an interview.

It’s a different world today.

intercst

as the SPX plunged 17% (the NAZ much worse)

Funny they never say in bull markets, “SPX rose 17% (the NAZ much better).”

And after 50 years the winner is…
NAZ vs. SPX
https://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/advchart/frames/frames.asp…

The Captain
like long term

6 Likes

That’s a pretty definite statement that unemployment WILL rise.

Just wait until Tesla unleashes Optimus, the humanoid Tesla bot. It’s rumored that Tesla will unveil a prototype at AI Day 2 later this year. Musk has said that the Tesla bot will be a bigger business than BEV cars and will be powered by the same general AI being developed for self driving. In parallel Tesla is working on Dojo, their newest supercomputer specifically designed to train AI neural networks.

People used to think of Apple as a computer company and now as a consumer electronics company but the secret sauce is the Apple Human Interface which they developed starting in the early 1980s based on work done at Xerox PARC, one of the leading development labs of the time along with Bell Labs and IBM’s research center.

Tesla’s secret sauce is AI. It is already being used not just in FSD software but in the Giga factories to monitor production quality. Tesla’s General Artificial Intelligence (GAI) will be the brains of the Tesla bot.

Why bring up Tesla? The Fed is working on unemployment. Tesla is working on unemployment. If I had to choose based on the impact on the economy I’d bet on Tesla over the Fed that creates nothing but phony money and lots of hot air. The Fed is not even listed on the stock market!

The Captain

Tesla’s AI Day 2: Expectations & Wishlist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wCUuvUftz4

5 Likes

Tesla’s secret sauce is AI. It is already being used not just in FSD software but in the Giga factories to monitor production quality.

Perhaps that’s why fit & finish and build quality falls short of Toyota.

intercst

6 Likes

People used to think of Apple as a computer company and now as a consumer electronics company but the secret sauce is the Apple Human Interface which they developed starting in the early 1980s based on work done at Xerox PARC, one of the leading development labs of the time along with Bell Labs and IBM’s research center.

Bell Labs developed lots of wonderful hardware but possibly their greatest contribution to technology was UNIX, the operating system that runs most of modern computers including Mac. It’s an interesting story. When Bell Labs wanted to transition to digital exchanges, in effect computers, there was no appropriate operating system for the job. So they decided to write UNIX. But there was no great programming language to write an operating system so they first created C. It’s called C because it’s an improvement over an older language called B. They were very creative people! :wink:

People see the hardware, the gadgets, but it’s the software that runs the world! Software is the brains of the wonderful machines.

The Captain
was lucky to land his first job as a programmer at the IBM Service Bureau in Caracas. It was the start of a wonderful journey.

6 Likes

Yet corporations do not appear to be hurt by the inflation.

Which is a good reason to invest in stocks, not in bonds.

Common Stocks as Long Term Investments
by Edgar Lawrence Smith (Author)

Edgar Lawrence Smith, (1882 - 1971) was an economist, investment manager and author of the influential book “Common Stocks as Long Term Investments”, which promoted the then-surprising idea that stocks excel bonds in long-term yield.

“I tried to write a pamphlet on why bonds were the best form of long term investment. But supporting evidence for this thesis could not be found.” This discovery led to the 1924 publication of “Common Stocks as Long Term Investments.”

https://www.amazon.com/Common-Stocks-Long-Term-Investments/d…

1924! Almost a century of wisdom!

The Captain

5 Likes

Just wait until Tesla unleashes Optimus, the humanoid Tesla bot

And wait. And wait. And wait. Just like full self driving. This is an example of why I no longer want a Tesla and feel their only advantage now is the SuperCharger network. Musk over-promises and fails to deliver, time and time again. And now he is scatter-brained. Where is his focus?

5 Likes

And wait. And wait. And wait. Just like full self driving. This is an example of why I no longer want a Tesla and feel their only advantage now is the SuperCharger network. Musk over-promises and fails to deliver, time and time again. And now he is scatter-brained. Where is his focus?

This is kind of true. You do indeed have to wait for your Tesla. I waited almost exactly 3 months from order to delivery. And today the wait is even longer for most popular variants, I’ve heard of waits up to 9 months at this point. But that’s not solely due to lack of focus, it’s also due to extraordinary demand. And there is extraordinary demand for almost ALL EVs today. For example, if you want a Ford F-150 Lightning, and I do want one*, you have to wait at least a year, probably closer to two. In fact, they won’t even let you order AT ALL right now! Same for many other EV models - Rivian, wait at least 9 months, probably closer to 18 months. Mustang Mach e wait is 6 to 8 months. VW id.3 is a year now. Kia EV6 is 10 months. If you look at the facts, the wait for Tesla is closer to the short side than the long side.

  • The ability to park a 130 kWh battery in my driveway and power my house for a week if power is knocked out is rather attractive. More attractive than a “puny” 11 kWh battery strapped to my garage wall!
1 Like

Musk over-promises and fails to deliver, time and time again. And now he is scatter-brained.

And there is extraordinary demand for almost ALL EVs today.

The Captain
thought it was all just a Musk Brain Fart (MBF) :innocent:

2 Likes