Control Panel: DJIA 50,000 and job "deep freeze"

I remember when the DJIA close was announced daily over the radio. I remember hearing that the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) plunged 508 points to 1,738.74—a staggering 22.6% drop—the largest single- day percentage decline in Wall Street history - on October 19, 1987, while driving for work.

It would have been unthinkable that the DJIA would ever reach 50,000. But it did on Friday.

Here are the stocks in the DJIA.

The DJIA focuses on the industrial side of the economy. It includes IBM, Microsoft, Apple, Intel and Cisco but not Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Nvidia, Netflix or Meta (Facebook). The tech companies whose stock prices have exploded over the past few years are largely NASDAQ stocks. They are included in the S&P 500 index but most are left off of the DJIA.

It’s only recently that the performance of the SPX outperformed the DJIA. But this stunning chart shows how the market has concentrated investment into the NASDAQ 100, especially since 2020.

Here is the NASDAQ 100.

The rise of AI is threatening many tech companies. Investors are moving capital out of these “AI-threatened” tech stocks and into “AI-resistant” sectors like homebuilders, consumer staples (e.g., Dollar Tree, Mondelez), and heavy machinery, which AI cannot physically replace.

Meanwhile, in the real economy, the pace of hiring has slowed.
https://www.wsj.com/economy/jobs/this-is-why-its-so-hard-to-find-a-job-right-now-f18bd1c0?mod=hp_lead_pos11

This Is Why It’s So Hard to Find a Job Right Now

A ‘deep freeze’ has enveloped the U.S. labor market. A whole bunch of factors are at play.

By Justin Lahart, The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 8, 2026

The pace of hiring in America has dropped precipitously, and there isn’t a single reason why.

Instead, there are a lot of them.

Tariff policy…

High short-term interest rates are another pressure, particularly for smaller firms, which often rely on credit card borrowing to meet financing needs…

Workers aren’t leaving the jobs they have. … the bulk of hiring in any given month is replacing people who have left. …

As a result, employment has been growing at a glacial pace, with the economy adding the fewest jobs last year, outside of a recession, since 2003. …

There simply aren’t as many people to hire. …immigration crackdown…aging population…[end quote]

Still, the economy isn’t in a recession. Growth is still strong. The unemployment rate is still low although it’s gradually creeping up.

The Atlanta Fed’s Latest GDPNow Estimate for 2025:Q3 is 4.2%, a very strong prediction which is slightly below the past months’ but still higher than the “Blue Chip Economists” at about 1%.

Economic activity in the manufacturing sector expanded in January for the first time in 12 months, preceded by 26 straight months of contraction, say the nation’s supply executives in the latest ISM® Manufacturing PMI® Report. The Manufacturing PMI® registered 52.6 percent in January, a 4.7-percentage point increase compared to the seasonally adjusted reading of 47.9 percent in December. The overall economy continued in expansion for the 15th month. Backlogs and new export orders are rising.

https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-pmi-reports/pmi/january/

Economic activity in the services sector continued to expand in January, say the nation’s purchasing and supply executives in the latest ISM® Services PMI® Report. The services sector is roughly 80% of GDP. The Prices index has exceeded 60 percent for 14 straight months.

https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-pmi-reports/services/january/

The Control Panel shows the rotation of market speculators from NASDAQ to industrials. The NAZ100 bullish percent has dropped below 40%, not as precipitous as April 2025 but still more than noise.

The strongest factors impacting the markets are the growing awareness of the vulnerability of the AI bubble (due to immense capital expenditures but uncertain bottom line profits from end users) and the nomination of Kevin Warsh to replace Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

David Bahnsen wrote an insightful Dividend Cafe about Kevin Warsh.

…> huge snip<…
My belief is that Warsh will attempt to do two things at once: increase shorter-maturity Treasury holdings on the balance sheet to meet the banking system’s liquidity needs, while reducing longer-dated bonds on the balance sheet. …

Productivity can and does grow incomes without sparking inflation. Warsh is, in my estimation, one committed to price stability (as all central bankers should be), yet does not make the mistake of confusing productive growth with a threat to the price level…

I believe Warsh’s vision is for the Fed to play a smaller role in financial market liquidity and to use deregulation to enable the private sector to do more of this itself. Less stringent capital requirements for banks allow their balance sheets to grow even as the Fed’s balance sheet shrinks. It is a deregulation and sensible capital-reserve tool that can facilitate greater bank lending (assets to banks) without spiking systemic risk, while allowing the Fed to reduce its balance sheet without undermining liquidity… [end quote]

I’m highly skeptical of removing regulations with the belief (hope) that a deregulated system will avoid running the car into the ditch and then calling for a public bailout.

Kevin Warsh is a believer in deregulation. He is a believer that the Fed should not enable deficit spending by Congress by buying Treasury debt (inflating the Fed’s already bloated assets which he wants to reduce). As if Congress is capable of reducing deficit spending. He is a believer that growth that comes from increased productivity is not inflationary (I agree with that). So he thinks that cutting interest rates won’t be inflationary assuming that productivity will increase.

In fact, Labor Productivity is increasing.

There was some flight-so-safety buying last week as the markets backed away from risk. Treasury prices and USD rose. Gold and silver dropped – it’s not clear whether this is a permanently popped bubble that will deflate or whether it’s temporary. The Fear & Greed Index edged downward to low Neutral. Oil continued to rise. Bitcoin continued to fall.

The Chicago Fed’s National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI), which provides a comprehensive weekly update on U.S. financial conditions in money markets, debt and equity markets, and the traditional and “shadow” banking systems, shows that financial conditions are still very loose. Margin debt is still climbing above record levels, supporting the market.

The CAPE is still expanding in its historic bubble.

All trends are intact despite noise.

The METAR for next week is partly cloudy. There will be some shifts in the weather but I don’t see a trend change.

Wendy

10 Likes

Ha. That’s a laugh. I find a half dozen “industrial” stocks in the DJIA. Boeing, Caterpillar, Sherwin Williams, 3M, Chevron, IBM, maybe a couple others.

But Coca-Cola? McDonald’s? Walt Disney? Nike? Apple? Visa? Proctor & Gamble? Microsoft?

The Industrial age has passed by, and (belatedly) the owners of the DJIA realized they were losing out on all those licensing fees the index funds were paying, so they juiced the listings to make it a hotter index. Nothing wrong with that, except the name is no longer reflective of what it purports to be: the industrial underpinning of the economy.

Here’s what the original DJIA stocks were:

  • American Cotton Oil Company
  • American Sugar Company
  • American Tobacco Company
  • Chicago Gas Company
  • Distilling & Cattle Feeding Company
  • General Electric
  • Laclede Gas Company
  • National Lead Company
  • North American Utility Company
  • Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company
  • U.S. Leather Company (preferred)
  • U.S. Rubber Company

Added some years later were more industrial stocks:

Goodrich
GE
Texaco
Baldwin Locomotives
US Cordage
Pacific Mail Steamship
Standard Rope and Twine
US Rubber
Standard Oil

Consumer goods were slowly added, starting in 1928 with Sears Roebuck, and later with Woolworth’s and Proctor & Gamble in the 30’s. But it remained largely industrial for another 50 years until they were afraid of brand diminution, when they decided to get in the game with a wholesale revision of the philosophy, which was to reflect “the economy” instead of “the industrial economy”. At that point things like Disney and Morgan got added, and the word “industrial” became meaningless.

Thank you for coming to my Ted talk.

7 Likes

Yep. I sold everything and went to fixed income for the next 2 years. I’m at least 25% poorer today as a result.

Learned my lesson – it’s been “Stocks for the Long Run” and Long-term Buy & Hold ever since.

intercst

3 Likes

“Industry” hasn’t been the underpinning of the economy for more than 40 years. It’s all crony capitalism and skim, scam & fraud today.

We probably need an index that reflects the “best” of that activity.

intercst

5 Likes

So banking and insurance, for starters. Can’t forget defense companies. Maybe corporate suckups: Meta, Tesla, Paramount, etc??

—Peter

1 Like

Since 2008 Industrial production has been n the doldrums:

The Federal Reserve’s monthly index of industrial production and the related capacity indexes and capacity utilization rates cover manufacturing, mining, and electric and gas utilities. The industrial sector, together with construction, accounts for the bulk of the variation in national output over the course of the business cycle. The industrial detail provided by these measures helps illuminate structural developments in the economy. The industrial production (IP) index measures the real output of all relevant establishments located in the United States, regardless of their ownership, but not those located in U.S. territories. For more information, see the explanatory notes issued by the Board of Governors. For recent updates, see the announcements issued by the Board of Governors.

1 Like

Comparing the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) to an inflation index (typically the Consumer Price Index or CPI) highlights the difference between nominal investment returns and real purchasing power. While the DJIA often rises, inflation erodes the value of those gains over time, meaning the “real” value of the Dow is lower than its nominal, headline number.

IBM was industry decades ago. Today it’s a has been. So is the DJIA

The Captain

The way the DJIA index is calculated is almost barbaric. For example, since it is not market cap weighted when a stock in the index splits (which usually happens after a lot of growth and high stock price) the weighting is decreased. If the Dow were calculated like the S&P500 is it would be much, much higher.

DB2

1 Like

That’s a good start. {{ LOL }}

intercst