Control Panel: Pricey stocks and "runnability"

“Runnability” is a new word for me but the concept certainly isn’t new for anyone who has studied the history of investing.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/17/business/dealbo…
What Has Changed Since Silicon Valley Bank Collapsed? Not Much.

Two years later, no major legislation or regulation has passed, and the basic problem that caused the crisis persists.

By Peter Coy, The New York Times, May 17, 2025


The financial system as a whole relies heavily on runnable liabilities — namely, sources of funding, such as uninsured deposits, that can be yanked away abruptly.

As long as banks are financially healthy, runnability is not a big problem. Regulators say the current risk is relatively low…But runnability becomes a source of vulnerability when insolvency threatens…

An interagency plan from 2023 to increase bank capital requirements starting this July 1, which bank lobbyists opposed, is being scaled back and postponed. Last month, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he wanted to “help get banks back into the business of lending” by reducing how much they needed to keep in liquid assets such as Treasuries. And this past week, The Financial Times reported that regulators were preparing to announce within months a reduction in the supplementary leverage ratio, a backstop safety measure adopted in 2014.

The financial system still relies heavily on runnable liabilities…Looking at the financial system as a whole, including nonbanks such as money market mutual funds, the Fed calculates that runnable liabilities equaled about 80 percent of gross domestic product at the end of 2024. That included commercial paper and the securitized lending known as repurchase agreements. …

A bank run occurs when depositors and other creditors of a bank start to worry that their money is unsafe or might become unsafe, and pull it out while they still can… [end quote]

The focus of the N.Y. Times article is the banking system. But all marketable investments are runnable. Pretty much every market crash in history has resulted from overenthusiastic speculators suddenly realizing they have run up prices too far, suddenly change direction like a school of fish and run in the opposite direction. (cf. “Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises,” by Robert Z. Aliber , Charles P. Kindleberger, et al.)

https://www.wsj.com/finance/stocks/stock-valuation…
Just How Expensive Are Stocks After All the Ups and Downs? We Check the Math.
A look at different methods for valuing stocks and what that might suggest going forward

By Sam Goldfarb, The Wall Street Journal, May 17, 2025

Key Points

  • Stocks appear expensive by typical measures such as price/earnings ratios.

  • Measures of relative valuation have helped predict the performance of stocks versus bonds.

  • Investors can compare stocks’ earnings yields with yields on U.S. Treasurys


P/E Ratios
When the whole S&P 500 is looked at, all three currently show investors paying a high price for every dollar of earnings compared with what they have paid in the past. [Comparing stock prices with a company’s past 12 months of corporate earnings, analysts’ expectations for its next 12 months of earnings or so-called cyclically adjusted earnings: the average annual earnings of the past 10 years, adjusted for inflation.]…

Earnings yield relative to Treasuries
Based on real cyclically adjusted earnings, the S&P 500’s earnings yield is currently around 2.8%, or 1.4 percentage points above the inflation-adjusted 10-year Treasury yield, according to data from the economist Robert Shiller. That gap, sometimes known as the excess CAPE yield, is well below its historical average, suggesting investors are so eager to buy stocks that they are willing to accept a smaller premium for the risk of losses…

As a reasonable guide to future returns, valuations are one tool that investors can use to build portfolios that match their risk tolerance and to make adjustments over time… [end quote]

The Control Panel shows a sharp trend uptick since the so-called “Freedom Day” announcement of high tariffs.

SPX has broken through the 20, 50 and 200-day MA although not yet reached to the February 2025 peak. VIX has plummeted and NASDAQ Bullish Percent is over 80%. Gold has dropped.

The Fear & Greed Index is in Greed. The trade is risk-on as shown by the rise in stock and junk bond prices relative to the 10 year U.S. Treasury.

Treasury yields have risen as their prices dropped. (Investors are shifting from bonds to stocks.) The Treasury yield curve rose over its entire duration over the past week. The 30 year Treasury hit 5% but dropped slightly. The 10YT Real Yield resembles the pre-Greenspan Fed years. Many traders have not seen such high real yields in their lifetimes and might expect interest rates to drop back to the negative real yields of the Covid time. But that’s not likely to happen, barring a financial crisis. As long as the Fed backs away from QE the market will control longer-term yields.

Higher Treasury yields place a high and growing interest burden on the federal deficit. That’s why Moody’s downgraded U.S. Treasury debt from AAA last week. In CBO’s projections, the federal budget deficit is $1.9 trillion this year, and federal debt rises to 118 percent of GDP in 2035. Economic growth slows and inflation declines over the next two years; both remain moderate after 2026. This is not including a recession that might be caused by higher tariffs. Recessions always increase government deficits due to higher unemployment insurance and lower tax revenues.

The options market bets that the Fed is not likely to cut the fed funds rate until September 2025 since the economy remains strong and inflation is above the Fed’s goal. Speculators have over-anticipated the Fed several times since 2022. Barring a recession and/or unexpected progress in lowering inflation the Fed will not cut the fed funds rate regardless of what the market expects. (Or how viciously President Trump insults Fed Chair Powell.)

The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the second quarter of 2025 was 2.4 percent on May 16. This is a nice, sustainable growth rate.

The Chicago Fed’s National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI), which provides a comprehensive weekly update on U.S. financial conditions in money markets, debt and equity markets, and the traditional and “shadow” banking systems, loosened in the week ending May 9. This has a more direct impact on business borrowing than Treasury yields. Financial conditions tightened around “Freedom Day” but have loosened since.

The political situation is unstable. Nobody knows what will happen to tariffs. Nobody knows how the economy will swing when consumers find bare shelves. It’s easy and fast to cut off imports but slow and difficult to start domestic production. Not to mention the increased prices → higher inflation.

The METAR for next week is sunny. All trends are moving toward higher stock prices and lower bond prices. But the METAR is a short-term forecast. The stock market is in a bubble. Banks are loaded with runnable deposits that could be pulled unexpectedly. [snap fingers] Runnability? It’s happened before.

Wendy

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.ht…

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.ht…

https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/candleglance.ht…

https://www.chicagofed.org/research/data/nfci/curr…

https://www.clevelandfed.org/indicators-and-data/i…

https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cm…

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REAINTRATREARAT…

15 Likes

Dear Wendy,

Sorry but the sky clouded over. There is now “strategic uncertainty”.

A line by any other name would smell as foul.

1 Like

How does one outrun runnability?

It’s kind of like playing musical chairs.
Wendy

Wondering when those two align again.

2 Likes

The risk of bank runs is baked into our fractional reserve system. The idea is that the central bank moves in to rescue banks subject of a bank run. Sometimes it doesn’t though (e.g. Lehman, Credit Suisse,…).

1 Like

It’s good to have friends in high places. We know there are, what, 19 banks that have “friends”. The other banks are left to fail, so the 19 privileged ones can take them over at bargain prices. iirc, that is what happened in 09: National City was in trouble, so PNC, which was not in trouble, but received bailout money anyway, used the bailout money to take National City over.

Steve

1 Like

To quote “Margin Call”: To make money in this industry you have to be smarter, first, or cheat.

The FDIC exists to protect depositors at member banks up to a specific amount. All these member banks are highly regulated by the Federal Reserve.

The FDIC then takes the failed bank into receivership and sells it to another bank.

The Federal Reserve only bails out banks if they deem that the failure would impact the entire financial system.

Lehman was a brokerage house, not a bank. It wasn’t eligible for bailout on any level.

Credit Suisse was not a member of the FDIC. While Credit Suisse did have a branch in New York, it did not accept retail deposits and the deposits held were not insured by the FDIC. Furthermore, Credit Suisse did not own a bank subsidiary in the United States and was not subject to the RRP requirements applicable to insured depository institutions. So it wasn’t eligible for bailout on several levels.

The bailout of Silicon Valley Bank was a different story.

Wendy

3 Likes

There is a small move toward alignment due to the Moody’s downgrade of Treasury AAA rating. But I don’t think that is enough to trigger a cascade.

I think it will come later this year due to tariffs.
Wendy

3 Likes

Hi Wendy,

Lehman was an investment bank.

Credit Suisse was not a member of the FDIC.

It was a Swiss bank. Switzerland also has a fractional reserve system, so in case of a bank run, the SNB could or should have bailed it (it didn’t for arguably good reasons - still, there is significant arbitrariness).

SB

OK…call it what you want but it wasn’t a savings bank controlled by the Federal Reserve’s rules. Lehman was 97% leveraged.

Wendy

3 Likes

Fannie and Freddie paper was not backed by the government. It said so in the prospectus. But even Jim Jubak, one of the more reasonable talking heads, was howling how the government had to make all that paper good, or, supposedly, no-one would buy Treasuries, which are explicitly backed by the government.

Guess it all depends on who would take a haircut, vs who would benefit, from a particular insolvency?

Steve

2 Likes

I thought it was outrageous that the government backed the Fannie and Freddie paper. And bailed out AIG. And so many other moves. But the purpose was to shore up the whole system. Who knows what would have happened to the housing market if Fannie and Freddie bonds went bust? It had nothing
Wendy to do with Treasuries.

As mentioned before, PennCentral railroad tried that “too big to fail” gambit when they went BK, to extort a bailout from Nixon. Nixon nationalized them instead. There was chatter about the US nationalizing the insolvent banks (as done in, was it Sweden?), but ideology was triumphant. Anything that had a whiff of socialism was immediately rejected, in favor of showering the favored with cash, whether they needed it or not.

Steve

1 Like

AIG wasn’t even a bank, it was highly leveraged and it owed important players. So it received a large bailout. (It profusely thanked taxpayers by paying out hundreds of millions of bonuses to deserving executives soon after). So much to rules.

That said, my original point was that risk of bank runs is inherent in countries running a fractional reserve system. Even well-run banks with sufficient capital can become victim of a bank run if confidence turns sour - that’s why, at least in principle, the central bank should be able to act as a backstop.

1 Like

Yes, being the lender of last resort was the original function of the Federal Reserve.

The question is, “What is sufficient capital?” The lower the capital the higher the risk.
Wendy

Interestingly enough, these 3 worked out pretty well for government. The taxpayers got paid back every penny used for their bailout plus interest in the end. That was not the case for the auto company bailout.

3 Likes