Elon Musk MUST be STOPPED!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/elon-musk-takes-aim-at-manned-fighter-jets-and-the-pentagon-s-costliest-weapons-program/ar-AA1uFvQB
Elon Musk takes aim at manned fighter jets and the Pentagon’s costliest weapons program

Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who is also co-head of the new Department of Government Efficiency that is advising President-elect Donald Trump, called out the F-35 stealth fighter on Sunday while endorsing drones over jets piloted by humans.

On his social media platform X, he reposted a video of synchronized drone swarms flying in elaborate formations and added, "Meanwhile, some idiots are still building manned fighter jets like the F-35.

the Defense Department estimates that the F-35 will cost $1.8 trillion, making it the Pentagon’s costliest weapons program.

Going down that path endangers Lockheed Martin’s rice bowl that contains its trillion dollar F-35 weapon system.

But Musk would in the fight of his life to end F 35.
LMT made sure to spread construction costs into as many Congressional districts as possible. Jobs & grease[$] is hard to defeat.

7 Likes

Now we are talking. Disrupting the war machine could be a really great move.

5 Likes

Until technology is developed that can shield a drone from electronic warfare, remotely piloted vehicles are unlikely to replace humans pilots.

I certainly don’t want our skies defended 100% by remote control.

6 Likes

When Musk first got kissy face with an openly, EV-hostile regime, there was the suggestion make here, that he stood to make so much loot off getting the inside track for his other interests, like XAI, on something like a defense contract, that the prospect of Tesla going to zero was trivial.

Steve

1 Like

The big money appears to be in R&D, not actually building anything. As soon as the 35 started volume production, I started hearing calls for the program to be curtailed, and development started on another plane.

Lockheed doesn’t make the avionics. They don’t care if it’s Raytheon, or Collins, or anyone else, making the avionics. They make the bucks “developing” the airframe, and “integrating” the systems. They would be just as happy integrating avionics that paid massive royalties to Musk for using his AI, as anything else. What would need massive AI? A pilotless aircraft. As Tim offered, several times, a lot of systems, and performance limitations, imposed on an aircraft, are there, only to keep that fragile human inside alive. Get rid of the human, and the performance envelope expands, a lot.

Trivia bit: USN carrier arresting gear is limited in the rate it decelerates the aircraft, so the pilot’s eyes don’t pop out of their sockets.

Steve

5 Likes

Faraday cage around the drone.

1 Like

And then your drone cannot talk to us. Or the other drones. USELESS!

3 Likes

Clearly, “development” needed. “Development” is where the money is. DoD will pay for “development” for decades, with nothing ever actually deployed.

Meanwhile, Proles using Tesla FSD are paying Musk to do the beta testing for his systems for him.

Steve

maybe they should consider the J35 instead: better priced, better performance and more functionalities…:sweat_smile:

how so? by injecting some Palantir or Anduril or one of the mafia’s descendants? That is what they want Elon to do? he is afterall one of them.

It sounds like you are just droning on. :joy:

Why does it need to talk to anything? Except itself, that is.

1 Like

2 Likes

Everyone is complaining about a far-better economy due to higher interest rates. LOL !!!

1 Like

That is what Musk’s AI is for: no need to talk to the person back in the US, driving the video game. The drone is self-contained, like it had a human pilot.

What if the AI makes a mistake? Humans make mistakes too.

1 Like

But I would think it needs to sense what is going on around it. Would a Faraday cage block the drone’s sensors?

DB2

What would they need a “Faraday cage” for? SR-71s operated for over 30 years, without one ever being shot down. They had both detection and jamming equipment on board. My interpretation of the above comments was the concern the control link between a pilotless aircraft, and the person driving it, from a ground station in the US, being disrupted. That is not an issue with an AI driven aircraft. It would be as self-contained as a manned aircraft.

Steve

2 Likes

Not 100% remote control but remote until they get in jamming range and then AI to lock on target and attack.

That was something Jerry suggested.
“Faraday cage around the drone.”

DB2