I have not subscribed long enough to Bert’s service or read enough of his posts yet to completely understand his methodology, but one common theme that I think I may have picked up on is his ability to evaluate companies taking into consideration valuation (ie. EV/S) while looking at valuation through the lens of growth. (Not strictly, but one of many hard and soft metrics that he uses). It seems to me that he often expresses an opinion on EV/S as it pertains to a “growth cohort”, such as 20%, 30%, 40% growers. I think he may be implying that high growth companies have to be evaluated differently; similar to points I believe some others have made above in this thread.
I am certainly guilty of investing in many companies discussed on this board that would never make the cut for my portfolio if I subjected them to a “valuation filter”. I believe that winners win. I won’t be right all the time, but it has worked for me. YTD I am up 37.4%. I suffered dearly during the heat of the rotation, but at the end of the day, I believe the market is efficient and recognizes quality and duly rewards smart growth.