https://insideevs.com/news/747374/ev-range-loss-cold-heat-pump-data/
- EVs with a heat pump retain 83% of their real-world range in freezing temperatures on average.
- Meanwhile, EVs without a heat pump lose roughly 25% of their real-world range on average.
- Having a heat pump isn’t everything, though; some EVs without one can still deliver over 80% of their real-world range in the cold.
it would be nice to know how different EVs perform in the cold. And here’s where Recurrent’s latest study comes in handy. It analyzed data from over 18,000 battery-powered cars in the United States and came up with a nice chart showing how 20 of the most popular EVs in the country are affected by freezing temps.
General Motors-made Chevrolet Equinox EV and Cadillac Lyriq. Both come with heat pumps, but their cold-weather performance is well below the competition. Recurrent said it got in touch with GM after triple-checking its data and that it will update the study after it hears back
Meanwhile, the Volkswagen ID.4 without a heat pump performed the worst of the group, losing 37% of its real-world range in the cold. The ID.4 is not available with a heat pump in the U.S., but it was offered as an option for a limited time to Canadian customers before being discontinued.
So do your research or your EV owning experience may be not so good.
Now the Norwegians did a test on how far can a 100% go.
They wanted to see the difference between the advertised range and the real-world range.
The winner, in terms of how little range it lost compared to the official figure, was the Polestar 3.
Next was the BYD Tang, a Chinese-made seven-seater SUV
Tesla had a single entry, the facelifted Model 3. It finished in 21st place out of 24 cars with a 24% difference between the WLTP range rating and the real-world mileage. The only cars that were worse were the Peugeot E-5008, the Voyah Dream and the Peugeot E-3008.
Besides the disappointing result in the range test, the Tesla Model 3 had quite an unusual issue–its onboard trip meter was way off and essentially lied about the distance covered. Motor.no noted that the Tesla Model 3 and the Polestar 3 conked out roughly at the same time, with just 800 feet or so between them. As a reminder, all cars started from the same spot.
That said, the Polestar’s trip meter indicated it had traveled 330 miles–a figure confirmed on Google Maps–while the Tesla reported an extra 10 miles. In other words, the Model 3’s driver would think they covered more miles on a full charge than they actually did.
A feature not a bug!
There is a chart at the link on how the contestants did.