Inflation is beginning to moderate

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/05/11/business/inflation-c…

NYT

snippet

Inflation moderated on an annual basis for the first time in months in April, though the 8.3 percent annual Consumer Price Index increase remained uncomfortably rapid and a closely watched index that subtracts volatile food and fuel costs accelerated.

Inflation, which had climbed by 8.5 percent in the year through March, is beginning to moderate on an annual basis partly because gas prices cooled last month and partly because of a statistical quirk. Increases are now being measured against high price readings from last spring, when inflation started to take off, instead of depressed 2020 levels. The higher base makes annual increases look less severe.

1 Like

Cheerleaders will shake their pom-poms, but a decline of 0.2% is within the statistical noise. I will bet you a quarter (my maximum bet) that there was some heavy political pressure to change the reading to get the “INFLATION LOWER!!” headline, resisted by doughty accountant-bureaucrats at the BLS.

Some of us (maybe you, too?) use food and fuel, so the “closely watched index that subtracts volatile food and fuel costs,” which accelerated, will be the one that families actually feel most keenly. The political and elasticity impacts will be based on actual household inflation.

Wendy

3 Likes

Inflation, which had climbed by 8.5 percent in the year through March, is beginning to moderate on an annual basis partly because gas prices cooled last month and partly because of a statistical quirk. Increases are now being measured against high price readings from last spring, when inflation started to take off, instead of depressed 2020 levels. The higher base makes annual increases look less severe.

I don’t know why the NYT calls this a “statistical quirk”.

Back in my day, it used to be called mathematics.

The annual increases look less severe because the annual increases are less severe.

AW

12 Likes

We’ve got a big China problem regarding their zero-COVID policy, that is impacting the ability to get a lot of stuff from them. Supply chain issues world-wide are hurting us, and we have little ability to fix that. (Aside from dropping China import tariffs, which helps price but not supply). Demand was stoked by relief bills at a time when supply was not ramping up.

I also believe we are seeing companies raise prices faster than their costs, which is tantamount to American companies hurting Americans just to help their bottom line.

On the other hand, a prior president wanted to on-shore as much production as possible, and policies were put into place that did not appear to make any of that happen. If successful those would have been inflationary as well (one can argue that tariffs are inflationary).

I’m not sure there was any path forward over the last several years that did not lead us to here, inflation. If anything, I think that COVID, with the large demand drop it created, pushed the inevitable two years down the road. And I don’t agree with the consensus view that the economy is in ruins. There is as much good to say as bad, if not more. 2021 was a banner year for GDP growth, employment, wages, and not much of anything was made of it in the press.

2 Likes

I will bet you a quarter (my maximum bet) that there was some heavy political pressure to change the reading to get the “INFLATION LOWER!!” headline, resisted by doughty accountant-bureaucrats at the BLS.

I’ll take you up on that bet for a quarter (my minimum bet).

And, I will magnanimously donate my winnings to the charity of your choice.

:slight_smile:

AW

NYT… Inflation, which had climbed by 8.5 percent in the year through March, is beginning to moderate on an annual basis partly because gas prices cooled last month and partly because of a statistical quirk. Increases are now being measured against high price readings from last spring, when inflation started to take off, instead of depressed 2020 levels. The higher base makes annual increases look less severe.

Leap1,

I can’t deny what the New York Times suggests - namely that a higher base, by comparison, can make annual price increases look less severe. I am a sophisticated consumer capable of seeing the coming moderation of inflation because I know that “the cure for high prices is high prices.”
- Any College Economics Course 101

However, the official figures released by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics this morning appear anything but reassuring to any consumer making a trip to the grocery store or planning a vacation (official government release not subject to copyright):

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf

The food at home index rose 10.8 percent over the last 12 months, the largest 12-month increase since the period ending November 1980.

The index for meats, poultry, fish, and eggs increased 14.3 percent over the last year, the largest 12-month increase since the period ending May 1979.

The other major grocery store food group indexes also rose over the past year, with increases ranging from 7.8 percent (fruits and vegetables) to 11.0 percent (other food at home).

The index for food away from home rose 7.2 percent over the last year.

The index for full service meals rose 8.7 percent over the last 12 months, the largest 12-month increase since the inception of the index in 1997.

The index for limited service meals rose 7.0 percent over the last year…

The index for airline fares continued to rise sharply, increasing 18.6 percent in April, the largest 1-month increase since the inception of the series in 1963.
[Emphasis added because the figures seem scary to even a sophisticated consumer like me]

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf

Even worse, according to US Energy Information Administration figures as of May 9, gasoline and diesel fuel prices are all up from a week ago, with diesel fuel averaging around $6 dollars per gallon.

https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/

I don’t know where in the world you live or shop, but in the continental US, everything I buy, sell, eat, consume, or throw out is transported at some point in the supply, delivery, or disposal chain by farm equipment, vehicles, ships, or trains which burn diesel fuel.

All the “green energy initiatives” our global population can collectively approve, impose, or attempt to implement cannot eliminate the world’s reliance upon diesel fuel obtained from drilling and refining petroleum products.

Any government that ignores the emotional impact of high food, consumer goods, and gasoline prices - any government that refuses to acknowledge the negative impact of high diesel and jet fuel prices - is a government that is inherently unstable and subject to removal by the ballot box or by whatever means is at the disposal of the population.

The Russia-Ukraine wheat supply crisis alone is enough to create government instability in countries dependent upon Russian or Ukrainian wheat.

Russia’s policy of military aggression, when coupled with the US government’s policy of intentionally reducing the volume of US-produced and refined petroleum products, is guaranteed to create government instability in countries dependent upon fossil fuels for electricity, heating, or transport.

I sincerely hope that the Russia-Ukraine war ends soon and that policymakers reverse course soon on US-produced and refined petroleum products. If not, then the following well-known quote may become self-fulfilling in the US and in other countries whose masses are forced to purchase products dependent upon imported wheat or fuel.

“For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.”

Hosea 8:7 [public domain]

3 Likes

Some of us (maybe you, too?) use food and fuel, so the “closely watched index that subtracts volatile food and fuel costs,” which accelerated, will be the one that families actually feel most keenly. The political and elasticity impacts will be based on actual household inflation.

Wendy,

Somewhere in there you are saying household inflation includes gasoline. In March wtic was peaking at $123…now it is peaking at $106…you would lose your $0.25…and I do not feel the need to take your money. :wink:

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DCOILWTICO

Currently there is a premium on oil. Meaning the Russians are being shut out of selling oil in Europe. Global prices are acting on that. The premium is going to disappear quickly.

1 Like

All the “green energy initiatives” our global population can collectively approve, impose, or attempt to implement cannot eliminate the world’s reliance upon diesel fuel obtained from drilling and refining petroleum products.

So, continue wrecking the climate and our future just so we get cheap goods today? That’s not a solution either.

3 Likes

AW,

The NYT is referring to comparing prices in April 2020 and the rise in inflation into 2022 v comparing prices in 2019 or 2018 to 2022. If we all remember in 2018 wtic was high for most of the year. Of course the inflation is still bad 2019 to 2022, but the year over year numbers early 2021 to 2022 are made worse by the drop in prices in 2020 rising as we went forward in time.

1 Like

NP,

The problem with all your stats is they are year over year. The Times was discussing year over year in the context of month over month.

Again where was wtic in March v April? For starters.

Where is the USD now compared to prior months? Where are interest rates going as the USD appreciates because the USD appreciating drives down nominally what we will pay for anything.

Currently there is a premium on oil. Meaning the Russians are being shut out of selling oil in Europe. Global prices are acting on that. The premium is going to disappear quickly.

Leap, you have said that a number of times over the last few months. While there is a war premium, remember that WTI started the year off at $75 (and it was back at pre-coronacrash levels in January 2021). The price rose steadily during January and February of this year. Before the invasion it was already up to $92, so only part of the premium will go away.

DB2

7 Likes

DB2,

You were right earlier this year oil would get to $100. You were not expecting the war. You are wrong that I have said there is a premium month after month. I said there was a war premium in March. That premium quickly disappear. I said it in March a few times. I am now reiterating there is a shut off of Russian oil premium that will disappear quickly.

“So, continue wrecking the climate and our future just so we get cheap goods today? That’s not a solution either.”

Reducing the global population would help even more.

Mother nature will help us there if we don’t manage it on our own…

Poultry (chicken specifically) and eggs are currently at artificially high prices due to avian bird flu. We have been through this before. It will take 12-24 months for that specific category to be rebuilt and return to a normal market. Until then, a very wide range of food sold in the US will be more expensive because they include higher-cost chicken and/or eggs.

Turkey is also included but it is used far less than chicken in the food system. The only real times turkey is the main meal is for either Thanksgiving or Christmas. Far less demand the rest of the year.

<All the “green energy initiatives” our global population can collectively approve, impose, or attempt to implement cannot eliminate the world’s reliance upon diesel fuel obtained from drilling and refining petroleum products.>

So, continue wrecking the climate and our future just so we get cheap goods today? That’s not a solution either.

Bjurasz,

I’m not suggesting that diesel fuel is a solution. Rather, I’d just like to point out that cheap and universally affordable foodstuffs - things like milk, eggs, and bread made of wheat - are not the same thing as “cheap goods.” The production and distribution of affordable foodstuffs - our highest civilizational priority - requires fossil fuel now and in the foreseeable future.

No government can survive in a world - even in a dangerously warming world - if the people (including the unwashed masses) do not have cheap food and potable water available.

The Romans understood this two millennia ago, Egypt learned this during the Arab Spring riots, and many more governments will discover this over the next few years if the Russia/Ukraine conflict continues to drive up the cost of wheat and fuel.

Even America, which is completely food-secure and potentially energy-secure, is home to people who depend upon cheap food to feed themselves and their children. They do and will continue to blame the government in power if they cannot afford to keep bread on the table and gas in the car.

The green energy revolution must be implemented over sufficient time and with a genuine sensitivity to the impact of food price inflation upon the poor and middle classes if we can have any hope of reducing greenhouse gases sufficiently to mitigate global warming.

As the climate changes, due in part to greenhouse gases, people will adapt and will vote with their feet by moving to cooler longitudes. Long before that, however, they will vote in their voting booth to oust any government they perceive as standing between themselves and affordable food for their families.

As for solutions, I favor practical, feasible, and sustainable food production solutions. No solutions are sustainable if they cause a rending of the social fabric between consumers and governments. Practical, feasible, and politically sustainable food production requires that cheap fossil fuel is available for some portion of our energy needs - even though renewable energy deserves its place at the top of the energy hierarchy, along with carbon sequestration and mitigation practices.

Incidentally, in regard to real, dynamic, natural, and feasible solutions, I will never understand why mass re-forestation programs have not been implemented by every government across the world (similar to Israel’s forestation program). Trees are great for locking away carbon and manufacturing oxygen.

Now is the time for trees.

https://www.arborday.org/

Now is the time for carbon sequestration.

https://www.forestfoundation.org/what-we-do/increase-carbon-…

https://www.jpost.com/j-spot/the-future-of-trees-in-israel-6…

2 Likes

Global prices are acting on that. The premium is going to disappear quickly.

As DrBob2 points out, that’s only a part of the outlook. Too simplistic.

Sure there’s some “war premium” for the Ukraine invasion. I’ve seen estimates of $20-30 a barrel. And it’s driven natural gas prices up to unseen levels. But lessons learned about depending upon Russia aren’t going away. It’s going to take time to restructure energy supplies to Europe. Time and capital. And changes in government policies.

Folks seem to forget that major oil companies like XOM and CVX have based their forward plans on a $60 Brent crude outlook. With sensitivities of $50 and $75. And they’ve even shown they can cover capex and dividends at prices down to circa $40 a barrel. So their outlook remains very very good even without the war premium.

And oil producers are not chasing growth this time - they’re paying down debt and increasing dividends and buybacks. They aren’t focusing on growth. They’re focusing on shareholder returns.

In addition, as forecasted some years ago, excess capacity in the refining circuit due to the pandemic has been significantly reduced. At the same time, travel - now including aviation - is quickly recovering. The combination has driven refining margins back to high levels. The cycle remains intact. And cash flows are now high versus historic lows during the pandemic. Meanwhile, petrochemical profits remain good. They’ve retreated from a supply-demand crunch early in the pandemic recovery but are still at mid-cycle levels - and growing.

So cash flow is doing great even without the Ukraine war premium.

You gotta look at the whole picture.

And it’s going to take some years to change. You can’t recover those years of low capex quickly. Labor, supplies, timetables, and shareholders are all constraints.

7 Likes

texirish: So cash flow is doing great even without the Ukraine war premium.

You gotta look at the whole picture.

And it’s going to take some years to change. You can’t recover those years of low capex quickly. Labor, supplies, timetables, and shareholders are all constraints.

Yup, it takes longer and costs (the consumer) more.

OT - News from Afghanistan, the Taliban are acting like US politicians again. }};-@

Anymouse (because I can’t spell anonymous)

1 Like

I also believe we are seeing companies raise prices faster than their costs, which is tantamount to American companies hurting Americans just to help their bottom line.

You might “believe” it, but I don’t think the data shows it to be true. The last few months have seen PPI increase faster than CPI.

It could be that the reason profits are increasing is because the same profit margin on a higher price results in a higher profit. For example, if an oil company makes 10% on the gasoline they sell, they will make $0.20 per gallon at $2/gallon gas, but they will make $0.40 per gallon at $4/gallon gas. Profit margin hasn’t changed at all in this example.

6 Likes

I also believe we are seeing companies raise prices faster than their costs, which is tantamount to American companies hurting Americans just to help their bottom line.

Walmart has been pilloried for many things over the years. WMT announced earnings this morning: “lower than expected”, and the stock is being hammered. Could it be there is a kernel of ethics at WalMart, and they are not gouging their customers the way many companies are?

Steve

1 Like

Walmart has been pilloried for many things over the years. WMT announced earnings this morning: “lower than expected”, and the stock is being hammered. Could it be there is a kernel of ethics at WalMart, and they are not gouging their customers the way many companies are?

Nothing to do with “ethics”. Walmart’s business model pretty much from day 1 was to have among the lowest prices, and a reasonable profit margin. Last quarter they apparently kept prices too low for too long as their prices for goods and labor moved up. They are correcting that right now … I get most of my groceries delivered from WalMart regularly and I see the prices of nearly everything going up in recent weeks. For example, Sam’s Club 2 liter soda was 88 cents in Feb, and is now 96 cents.

2 Likes