Meant to reply earlier, but life and real work get’s in the way. My comment was largely rhetorical, I assumed you were referring to the market as a whole. I think the chord that your phrasing struck with me is that we are in the technical trader’s sanctuary and I was thinking technical definition. Sorry, my twisted neuroses.
I’m not aware of any real published definition of “leg down” in stocks except for IBD and Double Bottom pattern with “two legs down.” And we all have heard reference to or experienced a third leg down occurring at times. But my focus is, to call it a third leg down implies that it is part of the whole prior pattern.
The key aspect to me is IBD’s criteria referring to, in the case of a double bottom, that the second leg peak does not reach the height of the initial peak and the low of the second leg undercuts the initial leg low. The importance behind all of that is the shaking out of weak stock holders for the next phase of an uptrend. When I have heard them comment on a third leg during IBD Live, they have given me the impression that the same criteria of lower high and lower low is what they are looking for to define the potential reaction. I fully can accept and embrace that perspective.
But the interpretation is analogous to reading candles, price action matters in trying to interpret the group psychology of the process to help “predict” (guess) the next phase of action. But that is what technical analysis is all about, using changes in price action to help give you clues about what might happen to defend yourself from catastrophic moves. Actually, in this specific case, to give you a hint that it may NOT be as catastrophic. My point rests on the fact that the “high” for the potential third leg exceeds the second peak, breaking the pattern and the interpretation. As is the case in most technical analysis perspectives, this previous high now becomes a support level. You need to look at this current action with that in mind.
Even extending back 8 months or so ago.
Which comes to my belabored point. It’s not just a matter of semantics, reading patterns and candles influences what you expect as possible or more likely to occur based on the technical changes. While disappointed in more bluster, I wasn’t as concerned as you seemed. Could it drop and be another significant decline, you bet. But, it’s no longer part of a double/triple bottom pattern so needs to be interpreted on it’s own merits.
Sorry to ramble and split hairs.
Lakedog