Medicare pilot program to require prior approval

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/28/health/medicare-prior-approval-health-care.html

Medicare Will Require Prior Approval for Certain Procedures

A pilot program in six states will use a tactic employed by private insurers that has been heavily criticized for delaying and denying medical care.

By Reed Abelson and Teddy Rosenbluth, The New York Times, Aug. 28, 2025

Like millions of older adults, Frances L. Ayres faced a choice when picking health insurance: Pay more for traditional Medicare, or opt for a plan offered by a private insurer and risk drawn-out fights over coverage.

Private insurers often require a cumbersome review process that frequently results in the denial or delay of essential treatments that are readily covered by traditional Medicare. This practice, known as prior authorization, has drawn public scrutiny

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plans to begin a pilot program that would involve a similar review process for traditional Medicare, the federal insurance program for people 65 and older as well as for many younger people with disabilities. The pilot would start in six states next year…People enrolled in traditional Medicare who live in Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas and Washington State will be included in the experiment, which is expected to start in January and last for six years….

The federal government plans to hire private companies to use artificial intelligence to determine whether patients would be covered for some procedures, like certain spine surgeries or steroid injections. Similar algorithms used by insurers have been the subject of several high-profile lawsuits, which have asserted that the technology allowed the companies to swiftly deny large batches of claims and cut patients off from care in rehabilitation facilities.

The A.I. companies selected to oversee the program would have a strong financial incentive to deny claims. Medicare plans to pay them a share of the savings generated from rejections…. [end quote]

This is a flashing red light.

It’s clear that the pilot program will be declared a “success” and applied to the rest of the country. It’s equally obvious that giving for-profit companies a “veto” over care will transform Medicare into Medicare Advantage – but patients will pay more for Medicare and get fewer benefits. Obviously the few procedures that will require pre-approval will expand into many expensive procedures.

Using AI will couple the inaccuracies of AI with the financial incentives to deny treatment.

This is a problem of Macro significance because it affects millions of Medicare beneficiaries.

Wendy

14 Likes

The spin on this could generate gigawatts of energy if only it could be harnessed.

4 Likes

Likely depends on the administration in power six years from now.

It is entirely possible that the next admin could scrap the program entirely.

2 Likes

The secret is ‘there will be no new administration’; you need to be paying attention. He is now creating his SA!

JimA

4 Likes

Came across this video on insurance company approval of artificial legs for amputees.

Traditional Medicare sets no limit on what they’ll pay for an artificial leg, as long as it’s medically necessary to restore you to the level of activity you had before the amputation. If you were a jogger or runner, you might qualify for a $100,000 model with microprocessor control.

If you have United Healthcare, it’s a different story. (Peg leg if you’re lucky.)

intercst

7 Likes

Here’s the top comment from the article from a retired doctor,

" Reid Hartson

San Antonio,TX

11h ago

As a retired MD, I’ve watched these market forces erode medical care for decades. The simple truth is there is money available for patient care, but insurance companies siphon it off for executive bonuses and shareholder dividends while adding NOTHING to patient care. Sure they color these efforts as attempts to limit unneeded care, but its all about profit. The bottom line is that good patient care is incompatible with profit motives. Procedures and care should be based on medical evidence alone as well as patient preferences. Profit motives of hospitals, drug companies, and insurance companies have diverted patient care dollars and adversely affected outcomes for too long.

{{ snip }}

I’ve been saying this for the past 25 years.

At least 50% of what you pay for healthcare is “skim, scam and fraud”.

intercst

11 Likes

Here’s the full list of procedures being targeted

Here’s a full list of the procedures that will be included in the pilot program:

Electrical Nerve Stimulators

Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Urinary Incontinence

Phrenic Nerve Stimulator

Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Parkinson’s Disease

Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Induced Lesions of Nerve Tracts

Epidural Steroid Injections for Pain Management excluding facet joint injections

Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation (PVA) for Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF)

Cervical Fusion

Arthroscopic Lavage and Arthroscopic Debridement for the Osteoarthritic Knee

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Incontinence Control Devices

Diagnosis and Treatment of Impotence

Percutaneous Image-Guided Lumbar Decompression for Spinal Stenosis

Skin and Tissue Substitutes —only applicable to MAC jurisdictions and states that have an active LCD in place

{{snip}}

That last one is a complete fraud. NYTimes ran a story a while back.

free link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/10/health/skin-substitutes-medicare-costs.html?unlocked_article_code=1.hk8.X9dB.Ud-uY38tab3f&smid=url-share

intercst

4 Likes

That bit really got my attention. Slipping in privatization and a profit motive for screwing patients.

None of this is good.

9 Likes